Skip to main content

If you're serious about seeing a progressive agenda in this country, it isn't enough to help elect Barack Obama to the White House or even give the generic Democrats-- from solid progressives like Richard Durbin, Barbara Boxer and Sheldon Whitehouse to the nominal Democrats from deep inside the Republican wing of the Democratic Party like Ben Nelson, Tim Johnson and Mary Landrieu-- a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. It is at least as important to help elect progressive Democrats, rather than what many refer to as Vichy Democrats.

Sure, it'll be great to see the end of Mitch McConnell's disgraceful career, but his Democratic opponent, arch reactionary Bruce Lunsford, will immediately descend to the rank of worst Democrat in the Senate if he wins. He will be far more of a problem for progressives than Lieberman or-- for those who saw Bill Maher's Religuous-- Mark Pryor. On the other hand, outstanding progressives like Jeff Merkley, Rick Noriega, Andrew Rice, Mark Begich and Tom Allen are either winning or within striking distance of defeating atrocious rubber stamp Republican opponents.

For the last 10 days People For the American Way, through their Voters Alliance, has been raising money for progressive House candidates-- not for generic nominal Democrats from the Republican wing of the Democratic Party, but for proven progressives, the kinds of men and women who will provide real leadership for the Democratic Party of the future, people like Darcy Burner (WA-08), Alan Grayson (FL-08), Larry Kissell (NC-08), Dennis Shulman (NJ-05), Russ Warner (CA-26), Mark Schauer (MI-07), and Victoria Wulsin (OH-02), to name just a few.

People For the American Way, the DCCC and Jared Polis For Congress have all chipped in $7,000 in prize money for the candidate who gets the highest number of dollars and for 2 candidates who get the highest number of contributors (even if they're just one dollar donations). Take a look at the list of candidates at the PFAW ActBlue Page. You'll notice that the most money is looking like a contest between two outstanding progressives, Judy Feder (VA-10) and Gary Peters (MI-09), each of whom is over the $25,000 mark. But numbers of donors... anything can happen. Martin Heinrich (NM-01), Dennis Shulman (NJ-05), Vic Wulsin (OH-02) are all in contention to win that one as well. Online donors blew by the $100,000 mark early this morning.

It's fun to play and fun to watch and any of these candidates can win against Republicans who have kept the war in Iraq going, rubber stamped turning the U.S. Constitution into rubble, helped cause the financial meltdown and earned the enmity of their constituents and of the whole country. Voting closes at midnight tonight... Pacific Time. Hopefully you've been reading about corrupt, far right hypocrite Virgil Goode's earmark for a gay porn movie. His excellent progressive opponent, Tom Perriello, only has $436 in the kitty. Maybe this is a good opportunity to help him out. Right here.

Originally posted to downwithtyranny on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 10:53 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Yeah... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    downwithtyranny, Jiffylush

    ...making the Democrats an actually Progressive party is going to take as much time as destroying the repiglickans. Have patience.

    In the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.

    by MBNYC on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 11:00:42 AM PDT

  •  hmm (0+ / 0-)

    why don't you compare how progressive/liberal these Senators are compared to their states?  I'd think, according to this criterion, you'd be more like to go after Mikulski or Carper, who are actually more conservative than their states as a whole, instead of moderate progressive (Harkin and Conrad are my favorites) who manage to support the party 70% of the time and come from deep red states (ffs, Louisiana will probably go 15 points McCain - the fact that we have a dem there at all is good news.  And Landrieu isn't as odious as others.)

    Having said that, Allen and Merkely are in Blue/Blue-swing states, and you drastically overestimate Noriega and Rice's chances (as well as Allen's).  Not that I'm saying don't work; I've donated to Noriega myself (and I live in Idaho) but the guy just probably isn't going to win.  Add on top of that Begich had at best a 40-60 chance of taking out Stevens before his ethical problems.

    Fact is, these guys may not back every proposal we want, but they'll help us get to cloture - which in most cases is good enough.  There are other, safer, better targets to work on first.

  •  Rick Noriega could be the lamest progressive (0+ / 0-)

    this side of Singapore and I'd still hope he wins. John Cornyn is a disgrace to all claims made on behalf of our species, and ought to be studied by physicists to see how they fit that much wingnut into one person.

  •  I agree that we need more progressives in office, (0+ / 0-)

    but less republicans is something we can do right now.

    Then we can work against non-progressives in races in the future where we have an actual progressive who can run in opposition.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site