Skip to main content

I am appalled.
I am disgusted.
I am saddened.
I am pissed off.

For the Senate Democrats to allow Joe Lieberman to retain his Chairmanship (and frankly, ALL committee positions and, in my opinion, even his membership in the Caucus) is an abomination.  This is the time to stop playing politics and do the right thing regardless of the consequences.  The Democratic Caucus has failed.

There are only 2 possibilities here:

  1.  The members are aware of their actions and willfully allowed Senator Lieberman to retain his post and are thus unfit for the positions they hold.  
  1.  The members are unaware of the their actions and are therefore negligent and unfit for the positions they hold.

Either way, I plan to assist in ousting these cowardly "representatives" during their next election bids.

If the Democrats can't even muster the courage to punish a turncoat like Lieberman - a no-brainer seeing as how even at 60 seats, Lieberman would be in an even stronger position to screw the Democrats - how can they be trusted to do anything right?  Not even a slap on the wrist?  This is an insult to us and a face-losing, abject failure for the Senate Democrats.

Didn't we just win an election to start doing things right for a change?  If the Senate Democrats are not doing the right thing, why should we allow them to remain our representatives? When will they learn?  

We're done with the old way and politics as usual, we want change NOW!  If you won't do it we'll elect people who will.

Originally posted to sinnyc on Tue Nov 18, 2008 at 09:18 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  It is clearly what Obama wanted... (0+ / 0-)

    In a 3 way negotation, if something in a negotation is a dealbreaker for you say holding a gavel and a third party that has tremendous power over the parties negotiating says, well I really am not going to take a position on the gavel but I will take a position on the Democratic caucus...which would be the first thing that you as the negotiator would give up on?

    This is basic negotiation tactics:

    A = Wants Gavel
    B = Wants to keep A in Caucus but no Gavel
    A = Won't stay in caucus without Gavel
    C = Tells A & B Wants A in caucus does not have an opinion about gavel.  C holds position of power over B

    What do you think B should/would do?

    This is not a big can slice and dice the words say some of them are unnamed aides quotes and other are direct quotes...but it is really quite simple...

    Obama/Biden'08 Winning Change for America and the Democratic Party

    by dvogel001 on Tue Nov 18, 2008 at 09:20:47 AM PST

    •  Well (0+ / 0-)

      You assume that there should have been a negotiation.  My position is that there was nothing to negotiate.  

      Dump Lieberman from all committees and offer him nothing but the option to stay in the caucus if he chooses.

      He votes mostly with the Dems anyway - if he were to stop doing that, he'd get voted out of office.  Hell, he is unlikely to get re-elected in '12 anyway.

      •  And if C had not said what he said... (0+ / 0-)

        that might well have happened...but it did not...I do not assume that there had to be negotiations, but the fact is that there were negotiations starting on Nov 5th...your opinion of whether there should have been is not relevant...

        Everything is negotiable in this world...

        Obama/Biden'08 Winning Change for America and the Democratic Party

        by dvogel001 on Tue Nov 18, 2008 at 09:33:00 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Again (0+ / 0-)

          Just because something is negotiable doesn't mean it should be negotiated.  Your argument is about the mechanics of the negotiation.  My argument is that, had the Dems done the right thing in the first place there would be no discussion of mechanics.  

          I would argue that my (and others) opinion that there should not have been negotiations  at all is actually exceedingly relevant - not to today's outcome obviously but to future dealings with Senate Dems.  

          As I wrote above, it is my opinion that this was an epic failure on their part.  It is my opinion that this will come back to haunt them.  It is my opinion that they should now be punished for failing to grow a pair and do the right thing.

          Anyway, it's moot now - they've pussed out and now we will just move on and try to apply pressure in other ways.

          •  Obama forced the negotiation... (0+ / 0-)

            by wanting Lieberman in the caucus...once that was seen as the objective of the President-Elect then there was a negotiation...until then you are correct, the Dems could have told Lieberman to take it or leave it...

            Obama/Biden'08 Winning Change for America and the Democratic Party

            by dvogel001 on Tue Nov 18, 2008 at 11:50:30 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

  •  You forgot...but not suprised! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Dreaming of Better Days

    Yes, the NSA can hear you.

    by Muggsy on Tue Nov 18, 2008 at 09:23:58 AM PST

  •  I'd like to see Lieberman suffer, but (0+ / 0-)

    it seems like there are bigger fish to fry right now to me.  One of the things Obama promised--repeatedly--was an end to "partisan rancor".

    I'm willing to give his approach a shot, and it looks like our leadership is doing the same.  

    And, perhaps it's worth remembering the LBJ quote (I heard from Sam Donaldson on Sunday), "It's better to have them inside the tent peeing out than outside the tent peeing in"

  •  'Is this what my money paid for?' (0+ / 0-)

    "Is this what my money paid for?"
    Line from the movie Dirty Dancing, delivered by Jerry Orbach playing the father character when he discovers that his daughter used his money to pay for a friend's illegal abortion.

    That's how I feel.

    Truth creates money. Lies destroy it. - Suze Orman

    by smartcookienyc on Tue Nov 18, 2008 at 10:08:37 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site