Skip to main content

Cross Posted from Huffington Post

The last 8 years of the Bush Administration taught us one certainty: There is always a backlash to extremity. Hence the historic election of Barack Obama as President of the United States.

Those who voted to elect George W. Bush in 2000, and most significantly in 2004, enabled him to push this country so radically to the right it made rebellion inevitable.

At Bush's behest, we ended up with a botched war in Afghanistan, an unnecessary war in Iraq, wrong sided tax-cuts, Katrina, warrantless spying on American citizens, a crippled economy, overwhelming job-loss, and over 10 trillion dollars of deficit.

Is that why the vast majority of Americans didn't vote for John McCain? Ya think?

Of course the minuscule remainder of unrepentant Bush supporters will never accept this reality. Rather than give Obama a chance to activate his positive visions of change, unity, and hope for America, these sore losers manipulate their own minds to create irrational scenarios they dread -- oh how they love to abuse themselves. I've heard the whining; "We're going to become a welfare country," "Obama is going to empower all the minorities," "There will be nothing left but section 8 housing and affirmative action," and "We're going to lose in Iraq." Talk about a circular firing squad.

This element isn't unique to the far-right. They're prevalent throughout the far-left as well.

Ralph Nader received 696,728 votes, Bob Barr with 510,177 votes, and Cynthia McKinney managed to garner 152,111 votes. These 3 nonviable candidates received over a million votes combined -- a total of 1.1%. I support Americans voting for 3rd party candidates, but it's so obvious those votes went right in the wastebasket. What is the sense in that?

The ultra-left is against any establishment candidate. They're absolutist and will not negotiate. They make no distinction between those who voted for Obama and those who voted for McCain. They unfairly view Democrats and Republicans to be complicit with many of the disasters created by the Bush Administration.

The best examples to cite are the A.N.S.W.E.R. coalition and The World Can't Wait organization. They marched on the Pentagon in March 2007 demanding the impeachment of George W. Bush and an immediate withdrawal of our troops from Iraq. Someone must have forgotten to tell them that the Department of Defense, our military's headquarters, doesn't hold impeachment hearings nor do they dictate our foreign policy.

Even worse, they accuse police officers who stop them from wreaking havoc on property of government agencies of holding membership in a modern day Gestapo or being direct proxies of Bush creating a police state -- total lunacy.

Every time they conduct an event they plan for maximum impact. If they don't achieve the desired outcome, they'll continuously up the ante. This causes them to appear even more extreme than they already are -- if that's even possible.

They contributed significantly to the decreased credibility of the anti-war movement by alienating the silent majority. What middle-of-the-road American wants to participate in an anti-war protest only to find themselves in an anti Semitic mob scene chanting "free Mumia," "overthrow the government," while wearing Che Guevara t-shirts and waving the Palestinian flag? Not me.

There are far right extremist groups to counter them such as the Free Republic and Move America Forward. They have no ability to look objectively outside the box. They pledge undying loyalty to George W. Bush and neoconservative ideology. If it were possible they would imprison or deport all those who disagree with them -- only they are allowed to be American and support the troops. I've personally been on the receiving end of their vileness. The Freepers (on many occasions) have called me and my fellow Iraq veterans who oppose the war cowards, phonies, and traitors. They even told us we should be sent to Guantanamo.

Eventually these types of groups (on both sides) will fade away into obscurity. They are socially destructive, politically irrelevant, and a speed bump to progress. Hopefully the recent election will hinder their circus act.

If there is any advice that I could give President-elect Obama and members of Congress (of both parties) it's this: Learn from the last 8 years of George W. Bush's failed presidency. His extreme right-wing policies caused the Republicans to self-destruct and emaciated the size of their party in both chambers of Congress.

Now that the Democrats have the White House and a sizeable majority of Congress they should not focus on pushing a leftist agenda (as their predecessors did on the right) that will certainly cause partisan political gridlock. Instead, they should work together with their collegues from the other side of the aisle to get things done for the American people -- it's to their benefit and ours.

Originally posted to JohnBruhns on Wed Nov 19, 2008 at 09:12 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  asdf (3+ / 0-)

    The ultra-left is against any establishment candidate. They're absolutist and will not negotiate. They make no distinction between those who voted for Obama and those who voted for McCain. They unfairly view Democrats and Republicans to be complicit with many of the disasters created by the Bush Administration.

    I have never met any of these people - roughly how many of these people exist?

    Is this the new reds under the beds?

  •  Thanks for comfirming my point (4+ / 0-)

    I had brought this up a couple times a week ago and got dismissed for saying so:

    The Democfratic Party, even in this new era of "national unity" has no place nor sees any role for the left and leftists in American political life.  We are to be deemed effectively non-citizens.  At least under Bush we had a role of organizing resistance across a range of issues where the Democrats were capitulating, such as torture, habeas corpus and warrantless wiretapping.  Under Democratic rule we would be demonized for continuing to fight for such democratic rights.

    Underlying this is a profound disrespect that the Democrats have for leftists as human beings.  Unlike, for example, the religious Right.  Democrats talk themselves red in the face waxing lyrical over the "respect we must all have for the deep and abiding values and principles of 'people of faith'".  However, we leftists, in the view of the average Democrat, have no "deep and abiding values and principles" that anyone is obligated to respect, or even to grant any consideration to. Given that this is the general, and quite openly and contemptuously expressed view of leftists as human beings, or rather sub-human beings, by Democrats, then over time Dems shouldn't be terribly surprised when leftists become increasingly disaffected.  Of course, they will be surprised, because in all their contempt for us as human beings, they'll assume we'll have as little respect for ourselves as they have for us, but they'll be wrong about that.

    This sig line is in foreclosure. For details on acquiring a credit default swap on this sig line, contact H. Paulson, Dept of the Treasury, c/o Goldman, Sachs

    by ActivistGuy on Wed Nov 19, 2008 at 09:21:19 AM PST

  •  Evidence? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Where is the evidence of this backlash?  The backlash against Republicans was because their ideas suck and hurt a lot of people, and eventually no amount of marketing could cover that up.

    FDR ran an "extremist" white house with radical changes to American governance.  His face is on the dime and his signature program, social security is still literally sacrosanct.

    LBJ ran an "extremist" white house which forced the south to let blacks vote and sit at the front of the bus, gave large sums to alleviate poverty and created socialized health care for the elderly.  LBJ has a poor reputation over Vietnam but medicaid and the civil rights acts untouchable cornerstones.

    The evidence suggests that the public (rightly IMO) responds to the results of policy, not to where it fits in on someone's arbitrary spectrum, nor to how much bickering and disharmony might have accompanied the policy when implemented in Washington.  No one cares if the minority party has hurt feelings.  Republicans talked about a "permanent majority" and spoke of Democrats as being "barn animals" who could be taught to tamely accept their role in the minority.  The voters didn't care.

    So, no, I reject your thesis:  Obama and the Democrats must boldly pursue the liberal agenda as far as the Democratic majority can support it.  Republicans will oppose anything more than incremental change.  Improve their lives and don't fear whether an idea can be called "extreme" because Republicans say it is "out of the mainstream."

    Help build the Progressive Governing Majority at Open Left

    by Scientician on Wed Nov 19, 2008 at 09:54:42 AM PST

  •  first of all (0+ / 0-)

    there is usually a backlash to "extremism", not "extremity". An extremity is an arm or leg.

    Also, don't be upset that these people are out there. They're powerless. If they had power, they wouldn't be blogging.

    Also, are we any better than Free Republic? This is not an objective site, and some of the stupidest shit I've ever heard is on this site. Sure, these people are on our side, but we are not necessarily looking outside the box either.

    Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have all the answers, but the Democrats have their heart in the right place.

    by thematt523 on Wed Nov 19, 2008 at 10:34:46 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site