Daily Kos

Myanmar cyclone, Katrina, People in Glass Houses...w/Poll

Mon May 05, 2008 at 07:19:30 PM PDT

The. Chutzpah. Is. Unbelievable.: In a press conference yesterday, Laura Bush took the Myanmar junta to task for failing to prepare its citizens for the recent cyclone (est. death toll: 10,000) and for spurning foreign aid.

Asked whether she worried that US aid might not reach Myanmar's people, Laura Bush replied: "I'm worried that they won't even accept US aid."...

Gee--it's too bad the junta couldn't learn how to lead from Boy Bush's government:

In one exchange, State Department officials anguished over whether to tell Italy that its shipments of medicine, gauze, and other medical supplies spoiled in the elements for weeks after Katrina's landfall on August 29, 2005, and were destroyed....And while television sets worldwide showed images of New Orleans residents begging to be rescued from rooftops as floodwaters rose, U.S. officials turned down countless offers of allied troops and search-and-rescue teams. The most common responses: "sent letter of thanks" and "will keep offer on hand," the new documents show.

http://www2.nysun.com/article/53433?page_no=2

I didn't know Bush was a Myanmar expert. Accoring to the article, she has taken a leading role in shaping our policy toward that country. She is also in charge of handing out foreign aid dollars, though a little fuzzy about the scope of our potential largesse, or even about whether we could give everything we would LIKE to give:

Bush said:

Washington "stands prepared" to increase its assistance well beyond an initial emergency 250,000-dollar outlay by the US embassy in Yangon.

She declined to give a precise dollar figure, saying the junta first had to allow a US disaster assistance response team into Myanmar to assess the scope of the devastation from Tropical Cyclone Nargis' weekend rampage.

"I can't speak to how large that would be. But I feel assured that it would be substantial, if we can give it," she said, promising help to provide water, sanitation, food and shelter.

Bush made clear any assistance would go through the United Nations or international nongovernmental organizations -- and not directly to a regime under US sanctions for failing to embrace democratic reforms.

What's more appalling? That they predicate their aid on a US TEAM to assess damage (the UN and Red Cross are babies in this arena), something highly secretive Myanmar officials are sure to sign up for, or that they are concerned that giving humanitarian aid might make them look like wimps for violating sanctions?

But it's too painful. Think of Katrina. Does this sound familiar, anyone?  

"Although they were aware of the threat, Burma's state-run media failed to issue a timely warning to citizens in the storm's path," Bush said in her unusual appearance at the White House briefing room podium.

Not only did our government not prepare its citizens--it sometimes stopped them from ESCAPING New Orleans (our heroic sheriff on the bridge, protecting the white suburbs) and refused or wasted aid from others:

Allies offered $854 million in cash and oil that was to be sold for cash. But only $40 million has been used so far for disaster victims or reconstruction, according to U.S. officials and contractors. Most of the aid went uncollected, including $400 million worth of oil. Some offers were withdrawn or redirected to private groups such as the Red Cross. The rest has been delayed by red tape and bureaucratic limits on how it can be spent.

In addition, valuable supplies and services — such as cell-phone systems, medicine, and cruise ships — were delayed or declined because the government could not handle them. In some cases, supplies were wasted.

Mighty America didn't need help. Heckuva-Job Brownie was in charge--and Bush was goofing around at state fairs, posing with a guitar. [Can this man really be the still-current president of the United States?]

While rescuers were still trying to reach people stranded by the floods, perhaps the only consensus among local, state and federal officials was that the system had failed.

Some federal officials said uncertainty over who was in charge had contributed to delays in providing aid and imposing order, and officials in Louisiana complained that Washington disaster officials had blocked some aid efforts.

Local and state resources were so weakened, said Michael Chertoff, the homeland security secretary, that in the future federal authorities need to take "more of an upfront role earlier on, when we have these truly ultracatastrophes."

But furious state and local officials insisted that the real problem was that the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which Mr. Chertoff's department oversees, failed to deliver urgently needed help and, through incomprehensible red tape, even thwarted others' efforts to help.

"We wanted soldiers, helicopters, food and water," said Denise Bottcher, press secretary for Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco of Louisiana. "They wanted to negotiate an organizational chart."

http://www.nytimes.com/...

Even aid FROM GOOD OLE GOP STALWARTS was returned:

Far from deferring to state or local officials, FEMA asserted its authority and made things worse, Mr. Broussard complained on "Meet the Press."

When Wal-Mart sent three trailer trucks loaded with water, FEMA officials turned them away, he said. Agency workers prevented the Coast Guard from delivering 1,000 gallons of diesel fuel, and on Saturday they cut the parish's emergency communications line, leading the sheriff to restore it and post armed guards to protect it from FEMA, Mr. Broussard said.

I'll close with this nugget from Wikipedia:

At least 1,836 people lost their lives in Hurricane Katrina and in the subsequent floods, making it the deadliest U.S. hurricane since the 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane. The storm is estimated to have been responsible for $81.2 billion (2005 U.S. dollars) in damage, making it the costliest natural disaster in U.S. history. The catastrophic failure of the flood protection in New Orleans prompted immediate review of the Army Corps of Engineers, which has, by congressional mandate, sole responsibility for design and construction of the flood protection and levee systems. There was also widespread criticism of the federal, state and local governments' reaction to the storm, which resulted in an investigation by the U.S. Congress, and the resignation of Federal Emergency Management Agency director Michael D. Brown. Conversely, the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service were widely commended for accurate forecasts and abundant lead time.[3]

The US Government knew in plenty of time that a catastrophe was headed our way. They did nothing. There was no plan in place for evacuation. The Federal Government's "relief" efforts were laughable. And they spurned search and rescue missions from foreign countries that could have saved lives.

I'm so glad Laura Bush is on task against that nasty junta RIGHT NOW!...though not sure why:

The source of [Laura Bush's] concerns was unclear. The head of a UN office that coordinates humanitarian aid said the junta had shown their willingess to accept such aid.

Poll

Why are these idiot criminals still ruling the most powerful nation on earth?

75%39 votes
5%3 votes
19%10 votes

| 52 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Iran, Myanmar, Burma, cyclone, Laura Bush, George Bush, Katrina, hurricane, foreign aid (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 24 comments

  •  Tips (21+ / 0-)

    Please rec so someone more adept than I can remind Americans just WHY the GOP and mainstreamers like Senator Clinton can't be trusted.

    •  Okay ... (0+ / 0-)

      I was with you on this until you put onus on Hillary Clinton for this.   With whatever problems you have with her, do you really think that Hillary would have the incompetence of George the W in August/Sept 05?

      •  No, not at all... (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        A Siegel

        It was just a weird thought that occurred to me given that it looks once again as if we're about to bomb Iran and she's been doing some saber rattling on that front.

        I don't equate Bush and Clinton. I also don't think Clinto will be our next Pres.  I think she's an extremely intelligent capable person who's gone off the deep end in recent months. She could've been VP or Secretary of just about anything, but not anymore. A real disappointment.  I don't think Obama is the Second Coming, but her campaign  and her recent pandering have been over the top. IMHO.

    •  Let's not forget Bush's other political agenda (0+ / 0-)

      Where others see human suffering, George Bush sees a way to harm political opponents.
      For Katrina, it was Louisiana's governor, a Democrat (of course):

      Documents Highlight Bush-Blanco Standoff
      By Spencer S. Hsu, Joby Warrick and Rob Stein
      Washington Post Staff Writers
      Monday, December 5, 2005; Page A10

      By Spencer S. Hsu, Joby Warrick and Rob Stein
      Washington Post Staff Writers
      Monday, December 5, 2005; Page A10

      Shortly after noon on Aug. 31, Louisiana Sen. David Vitter (R) delivered a message that stunned aides to Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D), who were frantically managing the catastrophe that began two days earlier when Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast.

      White House senior adviser Karl Rove wanted it conveyed that he understood that Blanco was requesting that President Bush federalize the evacuation of New Orleans. The governor should explore legal options to impose martial law "or as close as we can get," Vitter quoted Rove as saying, according to handwritten notes by Terry Ryder, Blanco's executive counsel.

      Thus began what one aide called a "full-court press" to compel the first-term governor to yield control of her state National Guard -- a legal, political and personal campaign by White House staff that failed three days later when Blanco rejected the administration's terms, 10 minutes before Bush was to announce them in a Rose Garden news conference, the governor's aides said.

      Versus now:

      Bush Urges Myanmar to Accept U.S. Disaster Teams
      By REUTERS
      Published: May 6, 2008
      Filed at 11:57 a.m. ET
      WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush made a rare personal appeal to Myanmar's junta on Tuesday to accept U.S. disaster teams that have been blocked and said Washington was ready to help more after a devastating cyclone.

      Addressing a government he has long tried to isolate, Bush said: "Our message is to the military rulers. Let the United States come and help you, help the people."

      I can't think why Bush is treating the Myanmar/Burmese military junta the same way he treated a Democratic governor - Bush LIKES military dictatorships. Still, the parallels are there: if Bush doesn't like you, he'll try and use natural disasters to destabilize your government.  It worked in Louisiana:

      Republican Leads Race for Louisiana Governor
      by Melanie Peeples
      Morning Edition, October 12, 2007 · Bobby Jindal, a Republican congressman from Louisiana, leads candidates in the state's gubernatorial race. Residents next week select who replaces Gov. Kathleen Blanco. She received widespread criticism for her role during Hurricane Katrina, which helped sink her polling numbers.

  •  Pots ? Kettles ? Anyone ? /nt (8+ / 0-)

    Let's get some Democracy for America

    by murphy on Mon May 05, 2008 at 07:25:05 PM PDT

  •  I'm curious: Why Laura Bush? (7+ / 0-)

    With all the talk of dynasties lately, I couldn't help but wonder if the WH might be trying to get her some official face time that she could use to claim executive experience for a run in 2012.  Paranoia setting in, I think. . . .

  •  Bush doesnt care about..... (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Avila, MmeVoltaire, Paddy999

    brown people. Kanye was right, but he should have broadened it to the Mrs as well.

    Reduce ♻ Reuse ♻ Recycle ♻

    by nolabelle on Mon May 05, 2008 at 07:40:02 PM PDT

  •  That was my first thought as well (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    MmeVoltaire, mango, Deep Harm, ArtSchmart

    Country run by dictator maintaining power through thuggery and secrecy. Disaster occurs. Refuses to accept outside help. People suffer because aid doesn't get there.

    Nah, could never happen here...

  •  Impeachment wouldn't have had political... (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    MmeVoltaire, Hedwig, ArtSchmart

    ...consequences.  Best case, Bush and Cheney get removed.

    Mid case, all the shit Bush and Cheney did gets laid out clearly for a national audience, and every Republican shill who votes not to convict after the impeachment trial would have to embrace shredding the Constitution (for starters).

    Worst case, Dems suffer the calamity that befell the Republicans after trying to impeach Clinton for his antics with Monica, which was -- what, 8 more years of Congressional majorities?  What did they lose, 4 House seats in the 2000 election?  While Bush effectively hammered Gore as co-presiding over a culture of corruption ("look -- things got so bad, Congress tried to impeach!")

    Four House seats.  That was the potential downside of pursuing justice against W.

    Pelosi's seat in one of the more exclusive circles of hell will be within spitting distance of W's...

    For the record, we still have more than enough petroleum to trigger runaway greenhouse effects before the stuff runs out for good.

    by Minerva on Mon May 05, 2008 at 07:48:30 PM PDT

  •  Actually the differences between the Myanmar... (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    MmeVoltaire, Hedwig, ArtSchmart

    ...junta and the Bush Administration in terms of competence and/or core ideology (loyalty above all else) are not that great -- go figure they see similar results in a natural disaster situation...

    For the record, we still have more than enough petroleum to trigger runaway greenhouse effects before the stuff runs out for good.

    by Minerva on Mon May 05, 2008 at 07:50:55 PM PDT

  •  What's most appalling (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    hazey, MmeVoltaire, mango, ArtSchmart

    is that the White House, through Mrs. Bush, made several comments certain to antagonize the Myanmar government, and announced that President Bush would award a medal to a Myanmar activist on Tuesday.  These comments, criticizing Myanmar to the world, came just as the UN and international relief organizations reported being on the verge of convincing suspicious Myanmar officials to accept foreign aid. Potentially, the insults could cause Myanmar to shut down discussions, leaving many thousands of disaster survivors without food, water and electricity. (See Disaster Accountability Project blog.)

    Mrs. Bush's comments included the following, per the Washington Post

    In response to the regime's continued repression, President Bush has instructed the U.S. Treasury Department to freeze assets of Burmese state-owned companies that are held in U.S. banks. This adds to actions last year to expand U.S. sanctions against Burma's regime and to tighten sanctions against its top leaders.

    The response to the cyclone is just the most recent example of the junta's failure to meet its people's basic needs. The regime has dismantled systems of agriculture, education and health care. This once wealthy nation now has the lowest per capita GDP in Southeast Asia.

    A short time ago, Canadian officials offered financial aid to Myanmar with no strings attached. Apparently, Canadians still honor a tradition once celebrated in this country where people do not criticize or threaten folks who are grieving after a tragedy.

    •  Deep Harm, you're so right on (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Deep Harm

      the Canadians are so often the power of example...

      this is a STUPID time to be thinking about sanctions and the like

    •  That's what got to me, too. (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      MmeVoltaire, Deep Harm

      The rhetoric was terribly provocative, at a time when Myanmar (no matter what one thinks of its leadership) is suffering greatly from a natural disaster.  Screw the politics; it was time to set that aside publicly while we figured out ways to help that would not antagonize the junta.  What do we do?  Antagonize the junta.

      I mean, were they trying to dirty the waters, since the parallels to Katrina were so obvious?

  •  I'm so glad someone wrote this. (5+ / 0-)

    I read the article and to think, the Bush administration was criticizing some other government on how it responded to a hurricane.  I was speechless.

    •  Relativism (0+ / 0-)

      Look at the laws.  The federal government had their hands tied during Katrina.  Rescue and evacuation is under state and local jurisdiction.  They failed.  When Bush did send in aid, Blanco rejected it when she wouldn't let him federalize the troops (therefore Bush had no authority).  Blanco lost her job over her mismanagement. How Nagin got to keep it still baffles me.

      Bush has authority in international and interstate affairs.  He has money and he can send in troops (something he can't do without state permission in the US).  Your relativism is harming his ability to act by undermining the United State's capabilities in international disasters and recovery, which is awesome.

  •  Local vs Federal (0+ / 0-)

    You seem to be mistaking local authorities with federal authorities.  State disaster plans are considered local and state issues.  In fact, when Bush did get involved, it was the state that rejected aid and troops to help.  In many ways, Blanco was acting like Burma's generals today.

Permalink | 24 comments