Skip to main content

Did you know that Senator Dianne Goldman Berman Feinstein is 75 years old? At least that's what Wikipedia says. Only her hairdresser knows for sure. She was born on June 22, 1933. Earlier that year, the Nazis started burning books and the US went off the gold standard.

DiFi (and I absolutely love this moniker for her) has been making news the last couple of days, complaining about no one coming on bended knee to inform her about Panetta, and now opining that Burris should be seated in the Senate.

What are we to make of this septuagenarian's newfound feistiness?

SF Weekly has a good post about the Feinstein-Panetta backstory:

The obvious hot point in the Panetta-Feinstein back story is the 1998 California governor's race. The two were widely viewed as the heavies in the Democratic primary, even though neither ended up running. In one episode from the prelude to the campaign, San Francisco Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi passed over Feinstein, a former San Francisco mayor, to endorse Panetta, then chief of staff in the Clinton White House.


Pelosi later threw her weight behind Feinstein for governor, amid speculation that Panetta had privately indicated she should change course.

The post later quotes a poli-sci prof saying this is typical minor-league intra-state, intra-party squabbling and nothing to get too worked up over. Ironically, Senate protocol dictates that the senators from an appointee's state present him or her to the committee. I believe this holds even if the Senator is from the party opposite of the President that is nominating the person. I don't know how that works when one of the Senators is the committee chair. Perhaps DiFi runs back and forth between her chairman's position and the nominee's table.

As for Burris, there are smart liberals who think he should be seated, so I don't think we should give her too much grief for this position. It's interesting that she's bucking the stance of boo-worthy Reid and yay-worthy Obama, but she is the chair of the Rules Committee, so it's not out of line for her to give an opinion.

But why is she making waves now? Perhaps she's decided that she'll retire when her term is up in 2012, and feels as free as a Haight-Ashbury hippie? Alzheimer's? Old-person Get-off-my-lawn McCainism?

Here's my theory-it was all an accident. She accidentally got on the freeway of modern politics, and she hasn't figured out how to safely move over to the exit lane without getting hit by a semi.

The ol' gal is 75 years-old folks. Three years older than McCain. They are both part of the "Silent Generation." From a NY Times article in April:

   Young people born in the 1930s experienced no such tumult. They typically came of age in the 1950s, when consensus reigned, and with it conformism. Young Americans were collectively disengaged from politics and distrustful of ideology. They were the "silent generation," content to be guided by their elders: Eisenhower, the avuncular white-haired president who had been the hero of World War II, and the Wise Men who formulated the strategies of the cold war.

Given the generation she was born in, and her own bland political history, I think it's safe to assume that she's not going to stay on the front-page for very long. I say we let her get off the main express and let her her rule her little Senate world without getting in our way.

Originally posted to danoland on Tue Jan 06, 2009 at 05:20 PM PST.


Who is your favorite person born in 1933?

7%16 votes
6%15 votes
4%11 votes
8%19 votes
1%4 votes
2%6 votes
1%3 votes
3%7 votes
0%2 votes
2%5 votes
25%56 votes
2%5 votes
4%10 votes
5%13 votes
22%51 votes

| 223 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site