Skip to main content

I wrote this post on my own blog for a more general audience, but thought I'd share it here as well to get feedback. I'm trying to define "The Village", or "the Washington Establishment", for people unfamiliar with the blogosphere usage of the term, and I would welcome comments on my definition and if these sorts of diaries are a useful idea!

I was getting set to write a post explaining the lefty blog concept of "the Village" when I see (via Atrios) that Jay Rosen has just provided the perfect jumping-off point. He cites a very useful diagram for understanding national media coverage, splitting issues into a "sphere of consensus", a "sphere of legitimate debate", and a "sphere of deviance", and argues that journalists see their role as objectively reporting on the debate in the second sphere, but their unacknowledged and more important function is simply classifying issues into these three spheres. So, for example, it matters more that the media have decided waterboarding is a topic of legitimate debate than it does which side wins the debate about waterboarding on "Hardball" some evening.
The whole post is worth reading; it's probably the best model I've encountered for understanding and critiquing the national media dialogue. But it also serves as a good introduction to the concept of the Washington Establishment, also known as "the Village". These phrases are bandied about the Internets all the time, but I haven't been able to find a good single post defining them - it's more something you pick up in context. I would like to fill that niche by offering a quick primer on the concept.

These phrases are shorthand for the idea that there exists a permanent class in Washington D.C. of people "who have a proprietary interest in Washington and identify with it". This set overlaps with, but is slightly different than, the set of government employees; the latter ostensibly serve at the pleasure of the people who elected them (or elected the person who appointed them), while the former are unabashedly self-interested ("Certainly the Washington insiders have their own interests at heart. Whenever a new president comes to town, he [or she] will be courted assiduously by those whose livelihoods depend on access to power."). The seminal article on the Village was written in the Washington Post by Villager Sally Quinn in 1998, during the Clinton impeachment. It's where I got those quotes above, and it's where the term 'Village' comes from, and it's full of other descriptive lines. For example:

"This is our town," says Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, the first Democrat to forcefully condemn the president's behavior. "We spend our lives involved in talking about, dealing with, working in government."
...Muffie Cabot, who as Muffie Brandon served as social secretary to President and Nancy Reagan, regards the scene with despair. "This is a demoralized little village"

..."We have our own set of village rules," says David Gergen, editor at large at U.S. News & World Report.

..."[Bill Clinton] came in here and he trashed the place," says Washington Post columnist David Broder, "and it's not his place."

...Presidential historian Michael Beschloss ... "When everything is turned upside down it affects our psyche more than someone who might be farming in Wyoming."

That's one big aspect of the Establishment mentality - the idea of entitlement, that being part of this rarefied group gives their opinions and feelings more weight than "someone who might be farming in Wyoming". The other, equally important, part is that the Establishment is out of touch with the rest of the country.

Around the nation, people are disgusted but want to move on; in Washington, despite Clinton's gains with the budget and the Mideast peace talks, people want some formal acknowledgment that the president's behavior has been unacceptable. [incidentally, this is what MoveOn refers to and why it was originally founded]
... this disconnect between the Washington Establishment and the rest of the country is evident on TV and radio talk shows and in interviews and conversations with more than 100 Washingtonians for this article.

The article is pretty fascinating in that Sally Quinn is obviously aware that she and all her companions are out of touch with the rest of the country, but instead of being bothered by this, she simply seeks to justify the Establishment opinions (showing off that first Establishment aspect of entitlement).

It is probably inevitable that a semi-permanent class of entitled and insulated people will assemble around power (think Versailles), but this fact seems to me to be largely unacknowledged in the national discourse (except for blogs, where it's extremely acknowledged). Just keep in mind when attempting to critically evaluate something you hear or read about Washington politics: a true public servant considers himself or herself to be fundamentally accountable to the public. "Cabinet members Madeleine Albright and Donna Shalala, Republicans Sen. John McCain and Rep. Bob Livingston, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan, PBS's Jim Lehrer and New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd", as well as David Broder, David Gergen, Michael Beschloss, Cokie Roberts, Joe Lieberman, and all the others, are Villagers, and consider themselves to be fundamentally accountable to the Washington Establishment. They're not the same thing.

Originally posted to michaelevan on Wed Jan 14, 2009 at 09:23 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

    •  Yeah, useful. Thanks for the insights. (0+ / 0-)

      I grew up outside and connected with DC, and I do understand how the mere proximity makes you feel as though the government is your personal neighbor and associate. Kennedy's assassination felt as though it happened to my best friend's Dad or something. Out here in CA, I have no such feeling - I am quite disconnected from DC, though I still have family there and understand that the DC people are making laws that change my life (or not-making laws). It's not only the power people who have a different feeling about things - I guess that's what I am trying to say. I was 17 when I left.

      Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. Matthew 25:40

      by pixxer on Wed Jan 14, 2009 at 10:41:44 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Agree and Disagree (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ghostlawns

    Agree with most of what's here.

    Disagree vigorously and LOUDLY with the conflation that happens on this site and other spaces, where the PEOPLE who live inside the beltway get lumped in with the self-interested political class.

    It's damn offensive and too many here including the FPers and the big guy himself do not take care to distinguish between the two.

    If my kid's daycare is located in a federal building that I go in/out of every day, does that make me a self-interested party?

    I think Beschloss' quote above goes to this point, though some want to read more into it.

    If the government goes on furlough for example, it impacts that guy dropping his kid off at a Federal building every morning even though that guy is not a Federal employee. There is much, MUCH less chance that the guy in Wyoming is directly impacted.

    Stop lumping everyone who simply lives in "The Village" in with the mindset you wish to generalize upon "The Villagers".

    "Watch what you watchin'. Fox keeps feeding us toxins. Stop sleeping, start thinking outside of the box and unplug from The Matrix doctrine." -Nas

    by malharden on Wed Jan 14, 2009 at 09:55:46 AM PST

  •  A perfect example of a Villager is (6+ / 0-)

    Mark Halperin (whom I like to refer to as a diarrhea salesman)

    his "work" mostly entails repeating "conventional wisdom" which often has no basis in reality and is mostly geared towards other people in the industry. He doesn't have an ounce of creativity in his body, which is evident by looking at his diarrhea masterpiece of a "blog," The Page. He attempt to pass on information by using the tools of the new media but fails miserably because he really doesn't know how to use them correctly and efficiently.

    * * *

    On a side note, whenever I hear the terms The Village or Villagers, I always think of the old 60s TV show The Prisoner which told the story of a man who was kidnapped and taken to a place called The Village which functioned as a prison but in the form of a closed society. Everyone there was assigned a number in order to remain anonymous The leader of The Village was a constantly rotating Number 2.  Free-thinking was banned. Blending in and following the arbitrary rules was the only way one could survive without being subjected to cruel mistreatment.

    An apt metaphor if you ask me.

    also, like such as. also.

    by ghostlawns on Wed Jan 14, 2009 at 10:15:33 AM PST

  •  Thanks for that Jay Rosen link (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SciVo, michaelevan

    I thought there was concensus about FDR successfully turning around the sconomy. But now right-wing media are challanging it. There was even some on FOX trying to claim there was concensus about FDR failing.

  •  February 7, 1968, by Peter Arnett (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mataliandy

    It became necessary to destroy the The Village in order to save it.

    Unnamed U.S. Air Force, on the destruction of Mekong delta provincial capital, Ben Tre.

    A conservative is a scab for the oligarchy.

    by NBBooks on Wed Jan 14, 2009 at 08:36:21 PM PST

  •  great article (2+ / 0-)

    this was a good point:

    "That's one big aspect of the Establishment mentality - the idea of entitlement, that being part of this rarefied group gives their opinions and feelings more weight than "someone who might be farming in Wyoming". The other, equally important, part is that the Establishment is out of touch with the rest of the country."

    keep it going.

  •  I really liked this (0+ / 0-)

    Thanks.

    [http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/1/4/23455/99659/388/679987 Let Rick Warren Raise Money for LGBT Equality at Obama's Inauguration]

    by CornSyrupAwareness on Thu Jan 15, 2009 at 12:39:55 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site