Skip to main content

Buried on p. A 16 of the Saturday Post is this article:

The House Judiciary Committee has rescheduled a deposition for ... Karl Rove, ordering him to appear on Feb. 23 instead of Monday.  It is unclear whether Rove will appear.  A federal appeals court is considering whehter former White House aides can be compelled to testify about matters on which they advised the president.

I realize some are spinning this as "buying Obama time" because the White House is scheduled to file a brief on Feb. 18 regarding the subpoena's for Meiers and Bolton.  That's nonsense.

As Jonathan Turley pointed out, the issue in front of Conyers' committee is the politically motivated firing of DoJ lawyers... something (else) Bush allegedly was not informed about.  

Last time I checked, Congress is (allegedly) an independent branch of government.   They were not afraid to make that known when it came to supporting Obama's policies.  As if they were afraid to admit they won, we had to listen to knuckleheads like Reid and Hoyer proclaim "I don't work for Obama."   So how is it that a fundamental constitutional power like the power to compel testimony or face a citation for contempt of congress is going to be put on the shelf because the executive MAY have a different idea about what information the public deserves to have?  

Something smells rotten here.

Rove's testimony on this matter has no bearing on what the Obama administration argues in its filing.  There is no claim of executive privilege here.  Bush didn't know about the political firings -- so they say.  Getting Rove to testify that he DID know about them would open up a whole can of worms (can you say perjury Alberto?  sure you can.)

Furthermore, you can be sure the Obama filing will lead to a new round of court battles -- unless the Obama administration argues in favor of accepting Cherry Picker George's Unitary Executive theory.  

God forbid that happens.  But if they do accept that, then Congress needs to force this in front of the Supreme Court by exercising their claim as a co-equal branch of government.   Otherwise we are looking at a newly minted legal right based on nothing.  We know where that leads.  Just look at what happened after Harry Truman created the claim of Executive Privilege from thin air.  Imperial Presidencies have wrought havoc ever since and brought this country closer to fascism than anything else.

Update: In response to some of the comments, it is important to note the precedent already set during the Clinton administration regarding claims of Executive Privilege by advisors.  Clinton advisors, Blumenthal and Lindsey, were forced to testify about the Lewinsky affair because

the importance of their evidence to the investigation meant they would have to do so.

By that argument, a whole bunch of former White House enablers and criminal conspirators should be getting frog-marched in front of cameras.

UPDATE II: As emptywheel notes in the comments, Rove's claim is even more audacious than some shadow of Executive Privilege.  He is claiming ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY.  Something even more outrageous.  All I can say to that is "Plus ca change, plus ce le meme chose."  The guys who made "the big lie" into an artform aren't about to give up on a proven winning formula... at least until they lose.

Originally posted to 8ackgr0und N015e on Sat Jan 31, 2009 at 11:41 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site