Skip to main content

In today’s Cincinnati Enquirer a guest column by John Boehner (a frequent occurrence) the House Minority Leader complains about the stimulus bill and lays out the Republican strategy to come over the next two years.  In part Boehner writes: many have called the "stimulus" plan the very worst kind of "generational theft." We are literally stealing from future generations in order to pay for a spending spree now that we cannot afford.  

Make no mistake, my Republican colleagues and I believe that Washington needs to act in order to pull our economy from a recession and help families and small businesses feeling financial pain. And while I hope the bill President Obama recently signed into law will help, I do not believe it is the right prescription. Instead, letting families, small businesses, job-seekers and home-buyers keep more of what they earn will spur savings, investment, and most importantly, job creation to help get our economy back on track.

More on the flip:

Were I to respond to the Enquirer, the likelihood my response would be published is very small.  So I’ll publish it here.  The battle lines are being drawn.

A Rebuke of Boehnerism

So the good "Dr." Boehner offers his prescription.  Stay the course, more of the same; tax cuts and deregulation, the siren song he and his Republican colleagues have been singing now for decades.  He’s like the old time "physicians" who thought bleeding with leeches could cure cancer or anything else that ailed you.

He neglects to mention it has in part been this very prescription that has brought us to the sad state of affairs we find today.  It is well understood that the business cycle will happen regardless of who or which party occupies the White House. From that standpoint, blaming George Bush for a recession is a bit unfair.  

But what is fair is to recognize that our current economic woes are far worse because deregulation and lax enforcement allowed the Bernie Maddofs of the world to loot the pocketbooks of unsuspecting investors.  Deregulation allowed the banking industry to create the house of cards that is now tumbling down before our very eyes.  And the enormous mountain of debt left behind by George Bush and his cohorts in Congress (like Boehner) make responding to the crises that much more difficult.

So disaster is looming.  What to do about it?  Economists almost uniformly say that federal investment to create jobs and jump start demand is the only solution that will work.  But that doesn’t conform to John Boehner’s dogma.  He complains loudly about the lack of "bi-partisanship," but when you look closely, what he really means is that the only acceptable policy Obama could have followed was to continue the Republican policies he inherited.  We’ve seen how that worked out.

To cover his tracks Dr. Boehner throws around loaded words like "pork," his cronies go farther with "socialist" and "communist," but again if you look closely, almost anything that involves spending is "pork" by his definition.  For him tax cuts are the answer. The hypocrisy of this given that Boehner and his Republican friends presided over the doubling of the national debt in less than eight years is breathtaking, they spent like drunken sailors for years and now there is little to show for it.

John Boehner is shamelessly gambling with the national welfare.  His gamble is that in 2010, this recession will still be with us and he can then claim that Obama’s solution didn’t work, and seek to reclaim the majority in Congress based on that argument.  Most serious observers agree that this mess is so bad it will take more than two years to correct.  So get ready, it’s coming, the new contract on America.

Originally posted to NewDealer on Sat Feb 21, 2009 at 02:07 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips for not allowing (5+ / 0-)

    Boehner's nonsense to go unchallenged.

    •  The lunatics no longer control the asylum (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      If they continue like this, they will again fail (remember the Whigs?).  They are reducing themselves - not to irrelevance (in the Senate anyway) - but to the status of a crazy aunt somebody has to take the car keys from.

      Except that the crazy aunt probably has considerably more credibility at this point.  

      Ninth amendment: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

      by UneasyOne on Sat Feb 21, 2009 at 02:33:42 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  I would go ahead and sent it to the newspaper. (0+ / 0-)

    What do you have to loose? They'll either publish it or not.

    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own set of facts

    by gritsngumbo on Sat Feb 21, 2009 at 02:40:59 PM PST

  •  The other fallacy in (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Boehner's prescription is found in this nugget:

    letting families, small businesses, job-seekers and home-buyers keep more of what they earn will spur savings, investment, and most importantly, job creation to help get our economy back on track.

    If I'm not mistaken, the stimulus package contains the largest tax cut in history, most all of it going to the middle class, i.e.,

    families, small businesses, job-seekers and home-buyers  

     Considering this, wouldn't you say that Boehner is rejecting the stimulus bill because it is a Democratic rather than a Republican bill?

    It's okay to love our country again.

    by SottoVoce on Sat Feb 21, 2009 at 02:59:05 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site