Skip to main content

The very good Joe Nocera has an interesting piece in the New York Times, which may read as a little cruel to some.  His basic premise is that Bernard Madoff had accomplices in his crime, and they were also his victims.

At a panel a month ago, put together by Portfolio magazine, Mr. Wiesel expressed, better than I’ve ever heard it, why people gave Mr. Madoff their money. “I remember that it was a myth that he created around him,” Mr. Wiesel said, “that everything was so special, so unique, that it had to be secret. It was like a mystical mythology that nobody could understand.” Mr. Wiesel added: “He gave the impression that maybe 100 people belonged to the club. Now we know thousands of them were cheated by him.”

And yet, just about anybody who actually took the time to kick the tires of Mr. Madoff’s operation tended to run in the other direction.

James R. Hedges IV, who runs an advisory firm called LJH Global Investments, says that in 1997 he spent two hours asking Mr. Madoff basic questions about his operation. “The explanation of his strategy, the consistency of his returns, the way he withheld information — it was a very clear set of warning signs,” said Mr. Hedges. When you look at the list of Madoff victims, it contains a lot of high-profile names — but almost no serious institutional investors or endowments. They insist on knowing the kind of information Mr. Madoff refused to supply.

I suppose you could argue that most of Mr. Madoff’s direct investors lacked the ability or the financial sophistication of someone like Mr. Hedges. But it shouldn’t have mattered. Isn’t the first lesson of personal finance that you should never put all your money with one person or one fund? Even if you think your money manager is “God”? Diversification has many virtues; one of them is that you won’t lose everything if one of your money managers turns out to be a crook.

There's no question that the SEC failed in a core function to protect the investor from fraud.  But did anybody really want them to step in?  The market was overheated for so long that investors felt entitled to unrealistic returns.  Those who trusted in Madoff didn't want to know how the decisions were made or where the money was coming from.  They were investing in another part of the shadow banking system, one that turned out to be as fraudulent as the supposedly regulated system of credit default swaps and collateralized debt obligations.

What Madoff did was a crime and the fact that he pulled it off for close to twenty years is an act of regulatory malpractice, but in the end, nobody - not least of which the investors themselves - wanted to pop the bubble anywhere on Wall Street.  If it wasn't ever-larger stock prices for the sock puppet it was more mortgages to slice and dice into securities and sell everywhere.  They made a fortune off of a phantom, and they certainly didn't want anyone telling them it wasn't real.

In another interesting perspective, Chadwick Matlin calls Bernie Madoff a hero, because he focused anger on an individual on Wall Street, as well as exposing the SEC and the whole regulatory apparatus.  I don't know if I totally agree with that, but what Madoff has done is uncover the danger of bubbles, and of endless belief in the power of small men who are mythologized into Masters of the Universe.  It has made plain that when wealth is rewarded instead of work, when the economy tips out of balance and moving money becomes a growth industry, when free market fundamentalism reigns, greed takes over, and the endless desire for growth makes fools of us all.  What Madoff has accomplished is to give recognition that we need what is being called at the highest levels a post-bubble economy.

The last point that I'd make -- and I made this point to the Business Roundtable yesterday -- it is very important, even as we're focused on the financial system and the credit markets, that we are laying the foundation for what I'm calling a post-bubble economic growth market.  The days when we are going to be able to grow this economy just on an overheated housing market or people spending -- maxing out on their credit cards, those days are over.  What we need to do is go back to fundamentals, and that means driving our health care costs down.  It means improving our education system so our children are prepared and we're innovative in science and technology.  And it means that we're making this transition to the clean energy economy.  Those are the priorities reflected in our budget, and that is part and parcel with the short-term steps that we're taking to make sure that the economy gets back on its feet.

In politics you sometimes need villains, and so calling out Bernie Madoff or the bankster CEOs is fine.  It's what they represent - an unsustainable bubble economy, based on cheap credit and over-leveraging and the illusion of wealth and prosperity - that is the real culprit, that took in all of us in one way or another.  There's no floor under our feet in such an economy, and so we have to rebuild that floor out of something heavier than air.  It's not going to happen quickly.  But it has to happen now, with the necessary investments to get it going.  This is why fixing what's broken is not enough, and reinflating bubbles will only lead to them bursting larger.

Originally posted to dday on Sat Mar 14, 2009 at 04:44 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Nocera's point (3+ / 0-)

    is that it wasn't the system that was bad, just the chumpy investors, at whom we are supposed to point and gawk.  As opposed to noticing that the whole assumptions of the hedge fund world don't seem to work out:

    1. The number of people who consistently make money in all markets in tiny.  In particular, a lot smaller than the number of funds.
    1. The idea that investors know what they are doing was also revealed to be wrong.

    "Dream for just a second and then do it!" -- Kolmogorov

    by theran on Sat Mar 14, 2009 at 04:50:40 PM PDT

  •  The American "Dream" is a Ponzi scheme these days (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    alizard, trashablanca, DrFitz

    At its best, the so-called American Dream has been a ideal of an inclusive nation built on egalitarian principle of democracy. But these days, the concept of the American Dream is basically being used as bait to drain millions of Americans of their equity.

    The New York Times had an article recently about how the bankers are looting America. Well, its not just the bankers, the entire corporate world, which grew fat on high margins and obscene profits, is unwilling to accept simply "good" profits anymore.

    For example, the health insurance industry gets 1/3 of every heathcare dollar and they massively ration care. And often people with heath insurance who were "foolish enough" to get sick end up bankrupt anyway. (They should have known!)

    These highway robbers are draining America dry.

    What the hell is wrong with this picture? When will it end?

    Obviously, the middle class's remaining wealth wont last long in the sights of these bandits.

    •  the fundamental purpose (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      of centrism, both in its neoconservative foreign policy and neoliberal economic policy aspects is the upwards transfer of wealth to the people at the point of the pyramid from everybody else everywhere in the world.

      That's the real American dream. And why it seems like a nightmare for the rest of us.

      Of course, centrism is also the dominant cult philosophy inside the Beltway, whether expressed by Republicans or DINOs or by the "journalists" who enable them.

      Looking for intelligent energy policy alternatives? Try here.

      by alizard on Sat Mar 14, 2009 at 05:21:02 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  We've become a nation of speculators. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    theran, DrFitz

    We had controls in place to keep the worst of it from rotting away the foundation, prior to Reagan.

    Reagan disassembled the firewalls, and Republicans and Democrats conspired over and over again to shift power to the banks, Wall Street and corporations.

  •  Chadwick Martin's piece (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    satirically, I'm guessing, calling Madoff a hero tells some pretty powerful truths. He also links to a Slate article (How AIG Fell Apart) that gives the best, most direct explanation of the CDS debacle and how it all unfolded.

    My financial innocence was lost in the heyday of Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, et. al. I awoke one day to find accounting at the heart of each and every scam run against school teachers, firefighters, policemen and all manner of pension funds. Despite Arthur Andersen's demise, the culture of "creative accounting" had been instilled in business in every form.

    From holding customers of closed accounts hostage for just a couple of billing cycles to mortgage companies stealing principle payments to stretch out the amortization, it came down to a neat, unexplored cooking of the books (special purpose entities) that led to even more creative insurance scams called Credit Default Swaps. All these need now are exotic names like Raptor, Osprey, Zenith and Rawhide.

    The ultimate conclusion:

    " Enron AIG robbed the bank, Arthur Andersen Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investors Services provided the getaway car, and they say you were at the wheel," Rep. Jim Greenwood, R. Pa. (fill in name of appropriate Congressperson) to David Duncan, former lead Andersen auditor for the Enron account the person eventually charged with cooking the credit ratings

    You've noted some great sources here. Nice work.

    "The well of stupid is deep." - Kossack TexasDan

    by MKSinSA on Sat Mar 14, 2009 at 11:25:07 PM PDT

    •  The real MSKinSA, a former drill sergeant (0+ / 0-)

      who we paid our tax dollars to support:

      As to the rest of it, your God, your safety.

      Which God is your God MKSinSA?

      Is there more than one
      Christian god? That's news to me.

      So you only care about those who believe in "your" God? As a former soldier? Who gets your fealty? Who do you care about? Which God's worshipers can go screw?

      Who gets your fealty? Me and mine

      Who do you care about? Me and mine

      And who can go screw? You. Just you.

      Come on MKSinSA. Now we know you've said you only care about those who believe in "your God." Just say what you think of people who worship other Gods. Just say it. Don't you have the courage of your convictions? Say what you think. Who are "Me and mine?"

      Who are "Me and mine?"
      None of your business. And that, gentle unhinged person, is my last to you today.

      Christofascism alive and well in the US military and at DailyKos.

      Thanks MKSinSA for making that clear.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site