Skip to main content

Apparently journalism now constitutes as a crime.

An Iranian-American journalist, Roxana Saberi was arrested on accounts for illegally purchasing wine in Iran. But that was just the beginning.  Even though this arrest alone seemed out of line, the arrest metamorphosed into accusing her for practicing journalism with an expired Iranian pass card, which somehow led to her final accusation as a spy for the United States. It is obvious there is no clear flow of accusations to being a spy: Wine to spy?  

Saberi’s situation in its entirety is absurd, in that there is no hard evidence in accusing Saberi for espionage. The Iranian government may be able to accuse her for manipulative journalistic goals, but in reality it is clear there is no connection between her profession as a journalist and ties with being an American.

At the center for Citizen Peacebuilding, an advisory board member told the Nichi Bei Times, “There is no capacity for Iranian, Iranian American journalists or any foreign journalists to do anything to harm Iranian interests and be accused of espionate”. Obviously, the Iranians either capture the journalists from a deep sense of paranoia, or simply as a mechanism to bring publicity to their abilities to hold an American “hostage”. To hold an outsider for acting out against the Iranian government seems appropriate because it is seen as a threat, but for practicing writing? This is her job as a journalist.

In a checkmate like manner, the Iran government seems to believe that holding Americans as prisoners for violating their laws is a political upper hand. According to the New York Times, the United States has played a vital role in reaching out to Iran for nearly three decades. This arrest is indicative of a political strategy where, “the arrest of a journalist [was used] to gain leverage in talks with the United States over its nuclear program and other matters”. It is true this arrest captured American’s attention, but as this analysis unfolds, the only response for Americans is to be humored that the Iranians believe arresting one journalist will ultimately give them more power.  

In addition, Abbas Milani, the director of Iranian studies at Stanford University explains, “It [the arrest of Saberi] shows the difficulty the Obama administration will have in negotiating with a regime that has so little value for the lives of its citizens.” Iran seems confused that it is their childish and undemocratic mannerisms that deter them from effectively communicating with the United States. The Iranians cannot expect the Americans to interact with them responsibly or cooperatively if they irrationally take a hold of our American journalists.  

Aside from Iran’s political agenda, this arrest was an indication of the insecurity of Iran as a country. As a bold journalist accurately doing her part, Saberi may have crossed the line in the eyes of the Iranian government. Her curiosity as a journalist in Iran may have triggered a fear that she would delve too far in Iranian stories that the government was not willing to reveal to the rest of the world. It is unjust that her role to spread news (that we most likely already know) warrants an arrest.  

Her situation galvanized a widespread outcry by the public worldwide. On, people with a common goal of human equality vocalized their opinions on the injustice of her arrest. It is clear that people worldwide do not accept Iran’s actions and support that she be released immediately. One Saberi supporter takes the situation in context of a bigger picture. He posts, “For freedom: Roxana’s, Iran’s, mankind’s”.

With expedient action, the Iranian government strategically brought attention to this Iranian-American journalist as a threat and felt compelled to accuse her on ludicrous charges with no basis. If the Iranians believe holding our people will give them more political power and will charge our citizens on no basis, then we should warn tourists that they be

Originally posted to polisci on Sat May 16, 2009 at 01:16 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  "there is no hard evidence" (0+ / 0-)

    We actually have no idea what evidence there is, hard or soft, because the Iranian courts are closed to the media.

  •  Um, not exactly. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Her lawyer revealed that the American journalist was convicted of spying for the United States in part because she had a copy of a confidential Iranian report on the U.S. war in Iraq.

    Saberi, 32, who holds American and Iranian citizenship, had copied the report "out of curiosity" while she worked as a freelance translator for a powerful body connected to Iran's ruling clerics, said the lawyer, Saleh Nikbakht.

    AP via Philly Inquirer

    I, too, would be curious to read the Iranian government's report on the Iraq war and its consequences, and think that a journalist is doing her job to try and learn of it.  Can't fault her for doing her job.

    The idea, though, that she was called a spy because she bought wine is just not true.

    Finally, new songs up at da web site! Also. . . grumble grumble mutter mutter

    by Crashing Vor on Sat May 16, 2009 at 01:22:10 PM PDT

    •  I have no idea whether or not she was a spy, (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Crashing Vor

      but it wouldn't shock me either way and if she was a spy, it's not like she would blow her cover just because she was accused of being one.

      •  if she was a spy, she was the worst spy ever (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Crashing Vor

        let's see, out shopping for booze consistently, took a trip to israel from iran, didn't even have her visa paperwork in order..

        i mean, wouldn't you think a spy would be a little less conspicuous?  stay off the rader, maybe?

        and it's not like a journalist would have any reason to pursue a confidential document, geez.

        if the US was accusing someone of being a spy on such little evidence, i tend to believe those calling this chick a spy now would be saying said hypothetical person is absolutely not a spy, this is just more imperialism!  unless they worked for aipac.

  •  Google Roxana Saberi (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Arken, Crashing Vor

    Comments on the NPR site indicate some plausible reasons for her arrest;

    possession of alcohol

    journalism without a license

    possession of classified documents, that she copied after having access as a  translator, connected to the office of the Supreme Leader of the Iranian revolution.

    illegal trip to Israel

    contacted by CIA agent trying to recruit her as spy.

    Lied about this to Iranian authorities,

    This from her own lawyer.

    Looks to me there is a little more to this than just "axis of evil" stuff.

    Homo Sapiens: The only species ever to go extinct by choice.

    by greatferm on Sat May 16, 2009 at 01:36:29 PM PDT

    •  add up all that and it says (0+ / 0-)

      "not a spy" -- a spy would be a bit careful, you know?

      journalism without a license and possession of alcohol, heh.  Iran has a right to their own laws, of course, but those are some dumb ones alright.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site