Skip to main content

I have read and received calls and emails about the recent "stunning" Gallup poll where, purportedly, the majority of Americans, for the first time in years, identifies as "Anti-Choice" vs "Pro-Choice."  Unlike the news media, the emails or (I suspect) anyone I saw on the morning pundit programs today, I went ahead and pulled up the actual poll questions and results.  And I saw a lot of things, including that support for Roe v Wade remains overwhelmingly strong.  

But what I really saw is that we are not holding ourselves up to the most basic standards of research as members of the mainstream media or as members of the social media community.  ENOUGH.  Here is the process I went through this morning that prompted the conclusions of this post.

Let's take a look at my bleary-eyed, decaf-guzzling process at 9 a.m.:

STEP 1: Turn on TV and hear update that Gallup Poll says more Americans are "Pro-Life" than "Pro-Choice" for the first time since 1995.

STEP 2: Google "gallup abortion poll"

STEP 3: Click on sensationalistic headline "Gallup's stunning abortion poll: Pro-life beats pro-choice‎" from Kansas City Star.

STEP 4: Read article's brief, limited presentation of poll, including statement that

A new Gallup Poll contains stunning news for the pro-choice crowd: Their side is losing, and the pro-life/anti-abortion side is finally winning.

STEP 5: Read email, receive phone call and read blog comments touting the poll or refuting the poll ("Gallup was wrong on all of the election results").

STEP 6: Summarize the inference from news, article, blogs, call and emails:  "pro-life" means "opposed to legal abortion."  Therefore, "opposition to legal abortion" currently outweighs "support of legal opposition."  Suspect that this is not in any way possible.  Decided to analyze the facts from the source.

STEP 7: Return to Google results and click on first result, the official Gallup link, to read poll questions and see response for myself.

STEP 8: Read and evaluate list of historical questions.

Questions and responses from 2009 May 7-10 include:

Do you think abortions should be legal under any circumstances, legal only under certain circumstances, or illegal in all circumstances?

22% Legal under any circumstances

53% Legal only under certain circumstances

23% Illegal in all circumstances

2% No opinion

With respect to the abortion issue, would you consider yourself to be pro-choice or pro-life?

NOTE: Trends taken only from polls where pro-life/pro-choice was asked following other questions on abortion (for example, what circumstances should abortion be legal trend)

42% Pro-choice

51% Pro-life

2% Mixed/Neither(vol.)

4% Don't knowwhat terms mean (vol.)

1% No opinion

51% self-identify as Pro-Life, but only 23% feel abortion should be illegal?  Doesn't that mean that more than half of the "Pro-Lifers" polled in favor of legal abortion?  And isn't that GREAT NEWS - and far more "stunning"?  It certainly is to me.

STEP 9: Boiling down the argument. Isn't what we are arguing about in this Pro-Choice/Pro-Life debate the "right to choose"?  And if so, do we care how people feel or self-identify as long as they are not trying to inflict those values upon other people?  And doesn't this poll show that by a vast majority, Americans are in favor of allowing some form of legal abortion?  And don't those numbers include MOST OF THE PRO-LIFE RESPONDENTS?

Just to show minor "trending over time," I took a look at the 2008 answers.  This time, Pro-Life or Pro-Choice was a stand-alone question.  But let's look at the separate results:

2008 Sep 5-7
43% Pro-Life
51% Pro-Choice

2008 May 8-11
33% Overturn Roe v Wade
52% Maintain Roe v Wade
15% No Opinion

So what I see from this poll is that there is no guaranteed correlation between being Pro-Life and Anti-Choice (which is what I call it to stay focused on what is at issue in the debate: whether or not women should have the right to choose to have an abortion), if choice is defined as legal access to abortion, as established by Roe v. Wade.  And that is how I, personally, define choice.  On a day when just 300 protesters out of thousands of attendees gathered against Obama as Notre Dame's selection as commencement speaker...on a day when Republican Party Chair Michael Steele tried to falsely recharacterize months of the debate as solely being opposition to Obama receiving an honorary degree...on a morning where now a day's worth of headlines have sensationally headlined this poll as evidence that we are losing ground...

We are maintaining and gaining ground on two fronts.  First, support for legal abortion, the real issue at hand, remains strong.  And second, those who oppose abortion for personal reasons are separating their personal beliefs from their legal considerations.  

I feel like saying, "Thanks, Gallup."  But first, since I am not a statistician, I welcome other analysis of the data that would help me and others better understand the import of these numbers.

And second, I want to continue stressing the important of speaking from information, not opinion.  And challenging filtered presentations that are spouted off as fact.  

Originally posted to dmitcha on Sun May 17, 2009 at 12:23 PM PDT.


What is your stance on the abortion debate? (sticking with the same poll category names as Gallup)

81%392 votes
2%10 votes
9%45 votes
7%34 votes

| 481 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site