Skip to main content

Cross-posted at Project Vote's Voting Matters Blog.

By Erin Ferns

Between 2004 and 2008, voter turnout among young people increased by two percent—or over 2.3 million voters—a triumph for this historically underrepresented group. However, with voter registration rates only increasing by one percent in spite of heightened political interest, it is clear that more that needs to be done to engage young voters beyond holding voter registration drives on high school or college campuses. While measures to provide voter registration or voter education opportunities for voting eligible Americans are important, three states have taken a step beyond by moving legislation to not only address the issue of standardizing the voter registration system, but to engage the future of America before they reach the age of 18.

Today, Hawaii and Florida are the only states that have enacted preregistration laws that permit all citizens as young as 16 to register to vote, a measure that advocates argue is the best way to incorporate youth into the democratic process.

As we reported in April, several state legislators have taken note, asserting that it may easier to conduct and participate in voter registration activities on high school campuses and DMVs with a lowered registration age. Lowering the age at which young people can register can boost "the effectiveness of civics education by tying it directly to civic participation through the opportunity to preregister," according to a Fair Vote report. The report further notes that ’uniform’ preregistration laws, like those in Hawaii and Florida, help alleviate general voter registration ills by acting as a ‘cost-effective step toward greater standardization, which means a cleaner, more accurate data set. Pre-registration could also save money and minimize human error by allowing students to register year round at points of civic engagement and education..."

In the last few weeks, legislators passed preregistration bills through at least one chamber in California (AB 30), Michigan (HB 4261 and HB 4337), and North Carolina (HB 1260). The Michigan and North Carolina bills have been assigned to their respective Senate committees while the California bill awaits its final reading on the Assembly floor. Passage of the California bill is thought to be most significant due to its growing and diverse population, particularly among its young residents.

"Research shows that early involvement in politics leads to lifelong involvement," said California Assembly member and preregistration bill author, Curren Price (D-Inglewood) in an April press release.  "Facilitating participation by younger voters empowers and engages our youth and ultimately strengthens our entire political process." The release further notes that the passage of a preregistration law would be beneficial to the state as registration and participation rates among young Californians is woefully behind other states, ranking 36th in the nation for turnout among young voters.

Thanks to growing support from voters and advocates, legislators hoped a preregistration bill in Rhode Island would not meet another doomed ending this year. With similar bills passing the legislature in the past only to be vetoed by the governor, institutionalizing preregistration in the state looked like it finally had a solid chance when the House adopted HB 5005 in March. The bill is currently sitting in the Senate Judiciary committee, however, and no hearings appear to be scheduled at this time.

Multiple factors affect youth voter participation, many of which parallel other underrepresented groups in the electorate. High mobility rates among these groups contribute to the difficulty with meeting voter registration deadlines and dealing with other administrative problems, including list maintenance issues that lead to wrongful purges, identification laws that require voters to present photo ID with current address, and other barriers more exclusive to mobile populations.

"We need only look at the revolution that has occurred during these Presidential Primaries to understand how hungry our youth has been to play an active role in their government, and how much their participation can influence our political future," Price said.  "I want to respond to the desire of our youth and encourage them to exercise their undeniable power to influence our world."

Originally posted to Project Vote on Thu May 21, 2009 at 05:36 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Why can't we simply make it mandatory that all (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Judge Moonbox, Larsstephens

    high school seniors have to register at the start of their senior year if they are going to turn 18 that year?

  •  As a Voter registrar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Judge Moonbox, Larsstephens

    I'd like to see more information and more specific information on your own efforts.  I was a registrar in both 2004 and 2008, and every high school that I called already had an active registration program.

    Are you aware of specific regions which do not?  Is there any program to locate volunteer registrars and fill that need?  Do you contact high schools annually to register students as they come of age?

    -7.75 -4.67

    "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose."

    There are no Christians in foxholes.

    by Odysseus on Thu May 21, 2009 at 06:45:28 PM PDT

  •  This is the key political issue (0+ / 0-)

    to face our nation.

    Fostering and encouraging participation
    by and of the electorate should be a
    national effort, with federal registration
    and voting guidelines established. This will
    of course be controversial, and would likely cost
    some hard fought and scarce funding, but is the
    essential tactical and strategic path to continued
    progressive and democratic electoral victories.

    The jurisdictional horrors of moving
    to another state or county or across
    the street should not be the institutionalized
    barriers for citizen participation they presently are.

    Of course, I believe that both parties, to a
    greater or lesser degree, benefit from this
    voter disenfranchisement. So this would likely face
    unified opposition from both sides of the aisle.

    Then some actual unified national voting and
    election laws and processes so that participation
    in your own governance is not always starting from
    square one, so that clarity, transparency, and
    verifiable fairness is maintained throughout our
    entire voting process.

    And finally, universal and or national suffrage
    for former prisoners and convicts. This is highly
    controversial and would likely require some sort
    of extensive litigation, but at least for federal elections,
    removing these almost impossible impediments
    to voting that can only be viewed as a form of
    ethnic and economic discrimination that they were
    intended and implemented for should be a major
    consideration in the steps towards true equality.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site