Skip to main content

No, this is not sarcasm, nor is it a right-wing screed.  President Obama's Department of Justice is now illegally in possession of over $30 million belonging to almost 30,000 American poker players, myself included:

In an apparent crackdown on Internet gambling, federal authorities in New York have frozen or seized bank accounts worth $34 million belonging to 27,000 online poker players, according to representatives for the players and account holders.

In an operation that began last week, the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York froze or issued seizure orders for bank accounts in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Arizona held at Wells Fargo, Citibank, Goldwater Bank and Alliance Bank of Arizona.

Now before we go any further, let me make it perfectly clear that there is no federal law banning Americans from playing online poker for money.  There are only two states, Washington and Kentucky, that have prohibited their residents from partaking.

The impetus for this illegal seizure of players' funds seems to be a newfangled legal interpretation of the law (specifically the Wire Act, which a court already ruled (.pdf warning) in 2002 only applied to sports betting) and the seizure was ordered without a warrant.  Even more disturbing is the fact that federal laws that are used to ban internet gambling are illegal under our obligations to the World Trade Organization:

The U.S. ban on offshore Internet gambling payments is illegal, the World Trade Organization said yesterday, upholding a decision that allowed for sanctions.

The WTO said the United States ignored the previous ruling, which challenged the U.S. ban on payments to gambling Web sites while allowing bets on its own soil.

Luckily, there is a lobbying organization, the Poker Players Alliance, one million Americans strong, fighting the illegal actions of the Bush and, now, Obama administrations.

Here is PPA Chairman, former Senator Alfonse D'Amato speaking out against the Justice Department's actions (FOX Business, sorry, but that's what I have).

There is also a bill proposed by Congressman Barney Frank that will be taken up soon:

Today, Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) unveiled legislation that would enable Americans to bet online and put an end to an inappropriate interference with their personal freedom.

H.R. 2267, the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act of 2009 would establish a federal regulatory and enforcement framework under which Internet gambling operators could obtain licenses authorizing them to accept bets and wagers from individuals in the United States. The legislation comes in response to the enactment of Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA), which restricted the use of the payments system for Americans who gamble online.

In addition, Chairman Frank announced today he is introducing separate legislation to delay the implementation of regulations pursuant to the 2006-passed UIGEA, which are set to go into effect December 1, 2009.  The regulations were completed by the Bush Administration at the last minute, and the legislation will stop Federal regulators from enforcing the UIGEA until Congress has had a chance to decide national policy.

This is a very important issue to me because it's how I earn a living while going to school.  President Obama has put me in a very precarious position, having illegally seized money that I, along with almost 30,000 others, have earned and need.

If you wish to speak out against this injustice, you can go to the White House website here and send a message along the lines of:

Dear President Obama,  

It seems your White House has not taken the Government Briefing Book very seriously.  The number one issue in Technology is Online Poker.  

Politics and political support as we all know permeates from the bottom up. So it is with issues. Though many pressing issues face you and me, more often than not it is the little -- and, to most in Washington, insignificant -- issues that personally affect the individual that matters most.  

This technology issue, online poker, is VERY important to many Americans -- Americans who supported you and the Democratic Party, both locally and nationally -- in the belief your administration would treat poker players at least equally to those who play other online games such as Spades, Hearts, Solitaire and dozens of other games who enjoy the right of privacy in their own homes to play online games of skill both for real money and for fun.  

Last week, YOUR Department of Justice continued the Bush era assault on poker players' privacy by freezing the personal funds of an estimated TWENTY-FOUR THOUSAND (24,000) American Citizens in the estimated amount of THIRTY MILLION DOLLARS ($30,000,000) of your American Citizen supporters' money.  

However, given the current action, if this belief was misplaced then support for Democratic candidates AND your administration will likely suffer.  

I implore you to direct action be taken addressing this issue and treat me, a poker player with respect and equality.

Thank you for your consideration.

Originally posted to AmbroseBurnside on Fri Jun 12, 2009 at 12:48 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site