Skip to main content

Update: several commenters have asserted that the claim that Gillibrand promoted English Only policies is false.  Well folks, the proof is in the pudding.  Gillibrand might have scrubbed her own site, but she couldn't scrub that of newspapers which quoted her pre-scrubbed site in January.  The facts are simply what they are:

El Diario also quotes from Gillibrand's Web site, which lays out her positions on immigration thusly:

"In Congress, Congresswoman Gillibrand has been a firm opponent of any proposal that would give amnesty to illegal aliens. The federal government must provide the necessary resources to secure our borders, which is critical for America’s economic and national security.

[snip]

In addition, Congresswoman Gillibrand believes English should be made the official language of the United States and she opposes providing non-emergency taxpayer benefits to illegal aliens.

Link.

------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm going to start this off by saying that I like Al Sharpton and probably always will.  I think that he's done some great things, and I don't think that earlier controversies which might have marked his career are dispositive of his long-term motives and capabilities.

And so in good faith I read, with alarm, the following headline in which Sharpton ostensibly called out racist language and was immediately ready to do a complete about face in terms of any admiration of Congressional Progressive Caucus member and NY senatorial candidate Carolyn Maloney:

Gillibrand-Backing Sharpton Hits Maloney On The 'N Word'

The Rev. Al Sharpton wasted no time in teeing off on Rep. Carolyn Maloney for using a racial slur during an interview with City Hall News, saying her alleged employment of "the 'N' word" is "alarming and disturbing at best."

"What????!!!" I said to myself.  "Have I been leaning towards a senatorial candidate who is a virulent bigot?  She actually used the n-word in an interview?"  

And then I read the backstory, and am now kind of disgusted...at Sharpton.  

Judge the offense for yourselves folks, and determine whether Sharpton has a point, or is grandstanding in service of the NY senatorial candidate and Maloney rival who he has endorsed, former Blue Dog Coalition member Kirsten Gillibrand.

This is the excerpt of the Maloney interview which Sharpton found offensive:

There is Carolyn Maloney, ripping into Kirsten Gillibrand broad and hard for voting against the two stimulus bills and for changing her positions on several core Democratic issues, sounding out her case on the fly as, "It’s the NRA, it’s immigration, it’s all these other things. In fact, I got a call from someone from Puerto Rico, said [Gillibrand] went to Puerto Rico and came out for English-only [education]. And he said, ‘It was like saying n—r to a Puerto Rican,’" she said, using the full racial slur. "I don’t know—I don’t know if that’s true or not. I just called. I’m just throwing that out. All of her—well, what does she stand for?"

Really, Al?  This is supposedly Maloney being a bigot?

Poor Maloney issued an apology, which IMO isn't even warranted, for this trumped-up non-issue:

"I apologize for having repeated a word I find disgusting. It's no excuse but I was so caught up in relaying the story exactly as it was told to me that, in doing so, I repeated a word that should never be repeated."

Hey, Al, on this one, DailyNew's Elizabeth Benjamin speaks for me:

Just so we're clear, Sharpton is not merely an outraged innocent bystander in this case.

He formally endorsed Maloney's likely 2010 primary target, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, last month, praising her "ability to bring people together, listen to their challenges and forge solutions to the problems they face."

Charlie King, who served until recently as the acting director of Sharpton's National Action Network and is still on the organization's payroll as a consultant, is a paid Gillibrand adviser.

We all have our preferences in terms of the best candidate for the NY senate seat.  Let's not get stupid though.  Sharpton's the one who owes an apology.  I'm throwing a flag down on the field for the offenses of Grandstanding and Cynical Misuse of Anti-Racism.  Keep it clean, Mr. Sharpton!

Originally posted to GN1927 on Mon Jul 20, 2009 at 02:20 PM PDT.

Poll

Is Sharpton right to be offended?

27%47 votes
61%105 votes
4%7 votes
7%12 votes

| 171 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site