Skip to main content

City Hall News posted a lengthy profile of Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, (NY-14), who is committed to challenging Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand in a primary next year, yesterday.

Her use of the "n" word in a Gillibrand-trashing anecdote garnered some attention, but more interesting was a discussion of the May push poll done for Maloney by Doug Schoen, Mark Penn's longtime partner in mischief.

This poll stunk when it was first released, now we learn it was not released in its entirety, a possible violation of state law.

What Maloney and Trippi needed to keep secret, below.

The poll showed Maloney leading Gillibrand 34-32, with another third undecided.

But when the push polling started, Schoen went easy on his client and wicked nasty on Gillibrand, and got the desired, publicized result -- after hearing the arguments against both of them, Maloney's little lead ballooned to 49-25.

Ben Smith at Politico posted this about the poll on June 9 (four days after Trippi was officially hired):

Such message-testing polls don't always match up with the realities of a campaign in which candidates don't get to choose the arguments against them.


The arguments against Maloney ... had less bite than the attacks on Gillibrand.


UPDATE: The respondents also heard a much longer battery of positive statements about Maloney, it's pointed out to me, so add a(nother) grain of salt to this section.

According to the City Hall News profile, Maloney was "really excited" about Schoen's salty poll, especially after she helped make it more of a push poll:

Maloney had Schoen pull the kind of probing questions that most candidates use to assemble baseline opposition research into themselves before moving forward. Instead, the poll presented her negatives by conflating Maloney’s votes on school choice, empowering law enforcement to fight terrorism and raising taxes into one question.

And then there's the question and response Maloney and Trippi wanted to keep secret, for obvious reasons:

The biggest problem discovered by the poll, according to one person who saw the results before they were made public, might be the responses to a question not included in the version provided to the press.

Asked whom they would vote for if they knew Gillibrand had the support of Schumer and Obama, people chose Gillibrand over Maloney 50-24 — no small factor given that White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel has so far stuck by the commitment to back Gillibrand, and Schumer will himself be up for election to a third term next year, allowing him to actively campaign with the junior senator at his side in neighborhoods where he runs strong but where she needs the boost.

So, Maloney crows over the 49-25 push poll result (not just now, she was doing it in early June, too), and refuses to release a question and response that got a 50-24 result in Gillibrand's favor.

This may be a violation of state law, which, as I understand it, requires that if you publicize a poll, you must release the entire poll, not just the good parts.

Whether or not it's illegal, it is certainly another deception by the Maloney/Trippi campaign.  

Anyone following this race knows that Schumer and Obama support Gillibrand, but lots of Democrats are not following this race at all, and do not know that.

New York Democrats will become much better informed about Gillibrand's high-profile supporters, and about Maloney/Trippi deceptions, over the next 13-and-a-half months.

Originally posted to devtob on Mon Jul 20, 2009 at 09:09 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site