Skip to main content

Written by Marcia D. Greenberger, Co-President, 
National Women's Law Center 

This week, the Senate will make history - the kind of history that makes our country proud. When the Senate confirms Judge Sotomayor, she will become the first Latina, the first woman of color, and only the third woman to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. Judge Sotomayor is an extraordinary person, who combines exceptional academic and legal qualifications and an impressive tenure on the bench with an abiding commitment to public service and an inspirational life story.

The selection of this exceptional woman demonstrates how the nation can benefit from the talents and skills of women and people of color at all levels of our judiciary. When she is confirmed, Judge Sotomayor will bring the number of sitting female Justices back up to two. As Justice Ginsburg said in May, "Women belong in all places where decisions are being made. . . It shouldn't be that women are the exception."

My organization, the National Women's Law Center, strongly supports the nomination of this outstanding judge.

The Center endorsed Judge Sotomayor's nomination after an extensive review of her legal record on issues that are of particular importance to women, her public statements and her testimony during her confirmation hearings. Our analysis is explained in our report, The Record of Judge Sonia Sotomayor on Critical Legal Rights for Women.

Our review allowed for only one conclusion: Judge Sotomayor is an impressive judge who is deeply respectful of legal precedent and who anchors her decisions in the specific facts of each case. Attempts to label her an "activist" judge ring hollow.

Judge Sotomayor's testimony at the hearings emphasized her true respect for precedent that her record reflects -- key for women who have secured hard-won legal rights and protections under statutes and the Constitution. And she demonstrated her remarkable legal expertise, proving under intensive questioning that she is extremely knowledgeable about the settled law that she promised to respect.

So it is surprising and profoundly disappointing to see how few Republicans - a mere six - have announced their support of her nomination so far. And it is dismaying to see how many of those who oppose her nomination have tried - in blatant disregard of the facts - to paint her as an "activist" judge whose personal beliefs and preferences dictate the results in her courtroom.

Unfortunately, these spurious charges are aimed at the wrong nominees. For all their talk of balls and strikes and impartial judging during their own confirmation hearings, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, joined by their conservative brethren, have effectively eviscerated legal protections that women relied on for decades - including the ability to redress pay inequity, protections for women's health, and protections against unequal treatment for pregnant employees.

Those Senators who haven't made up their minds should look at the facts, which demonstrate that their colleagues' rhetoric flies in the face of Judge Sotomayor's record, testimony, lifelong accomplishments, and unparalleled qualifications.

Judge Sotomayor is a remarkably qualified, gifted and inspiring woman who belongs on the Supreme Court. Republican and Democratic Senators alike should vote to confirm her resoundingly. The time for this watershed moment in our nation's history is now.

Cross-posted from Huffington Post.

Originally posted to National Women's Law Center on Wed Aug 05, 2009 at 10:20 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site