Skip to main content

There are three very distinct groups that constitute public option opposition at Congressional town hall meetings across the country, and it's vitally important to recognize the difference between the three: 1) bussed in industry-funded front groups starting disruptions to silence other viewpoints along with insurance company employees well-camouflaged enough to fool the most vigilant and cynical among us, 2) local homegrown pro-life and/or elderly voters who have received disinformation about abortion or euthanasia and are sincerely concerned, and 3) local homegrown libertarians who have been consistent in their opposition to major federal government programs and are sincerely concerned.


How does one determine a strategy of speaking up at these meetings that simultaneously deals with all three disparate groups while at the same time convincing undecideds about the public option?


The answer below the fold...

                                                           Table Of Contents


I. The Ten Health Care Talking Points Every Public Option Supporter Should Know


II. Understanding Why The Sequence Is Important


III. A Short Summary of The Talking Points List


IV. Rebuttals to The Ten Most Common Opposition Arguments (NEWLY UPDATED AND REVISED)


V. How To Use These Tools To Stop Disruptions (NEWLY UPDATED AND REVISED)





        The Ten Health Care Talking Points EVERY PUBLIC OPTION SUPPORTER SHOULD KNOW

  1. When you need life-saving care, private insurance companies only profit by denying you and letting you die.  If you have paid your premiums on time all your life, you're as likely to be dropped by your private insurance company when you need life-saving care as you are to get treated.  A public option gives you a lifeline.
  1. Private insurance companies are spending over a million dollars a day to kill the public option by inventing phony citizen groups, and trying to scare the elderly about euthanasia and pro-lifers with abortion; they know the only way to kill reform is to get people of good conscience fighting each other over misinformation, while they laugh all the way to the bank.  They don't think very highly of our intelligence.
  1. We pay more than any other country to be 24th in life expectancy: while the average Canadian family spends less than $2000 a year on health care with no waiting periods for life-saving care, the average American family spends $16,800 a year, waiting for private insurance companies to approve life-saving treatments.
  1. Fourteen thousand Americans lose their health insurance every day; over forty-six million are currently uninsured.
  1. Eighteen thousand Americans DIE each year due to lack of health care: THAT'S 50 A DAY.
  1. Nearly two-thirds of American personal bankruptcies are related to health care costs.
  1. Businesses - particularly small businesses - cannot afford to provide health insurance for their employees under the current employer based private insurance system, and will be forced to either drop their coverage or go out of business unless a public option is passed.
  1. One-sixth of all our government spending is on health care, twice as much as any other country spends out of its budget.  Our nation pays $2.5 trillion for care costing $912 billion.
  1. Every independent estimate says the public option will save us money, from saving 150 billion dollars (CBO) to saving 265 billion dollars (Commonwealth).  The Congressional Budget Office estimates the current bill in the House would actually leave a 6 billion dollar surplus  
  1. So - if you'd rather spend more taxpayer money, bankrupt businesses, AND pay $16,800 a year for your family's private insurance coverage in exchange for a policy that can be dumped the second you actually need it, then the current system is great for you.  If you'd rather spend less, wait less, have less of a chance of dying, and want to remove the corporate bureaucrat from between you and your doctor, then a public option is the way to go.  Right now, even if you're lucky enough not to be dropped by your provider when you need urgent medical care, your private insurance company can overrule your doctor's advice for life-saving treatment and only offer to cover something cheaper; a public option would remove that middleman and leave these decisions where they belong, between the patient and doctor.


Any private citizen or elected Democrat making the case for the public option, whether going to a town meeting, speaking on the airwaves, or debating behind closed doors should know the order of these talking points in and out. They're quick, they're effective, they cite non-partisan sources, and when communicated in sequence, they're bulletproof.  Most importantly, they kill every Republican talking point while staying consistently on the offensive.


Notes: The numbers are purposefully lowballed/rounded down in order to avoid a subsequent conversation devolving into bickering that distracts from the main points being made.  The statistic about the average Canadian family paying less than $2000/yr is based on a single Canadian paying $40 a month, as the source reflects, times 12 months ($480/yr) times a family of four ($1920/yr).





                    Understanding Why The SEQUENCE of The List Is So Important


Consider, a simplified overview of the list would be:

  1. Don't believe for a second that you're immune
  1. They must think we're fucking idiots
  1. You're getting ripped off
  1. The walls are closing in
  1. The threat is a mortal one
  1. People are going broke
  1. Businesses are going broke
  1. Our government is going broke
  1. A public option saves everyone money
  1. Private insurance is what's killing the patient-doctor relationship

Steps one through three in sequence are what especially open the door for undecided citizens on the issue to listen to the remainder of the argument without glazing over at all the figures.  Voters first listen if they think something effects THEM, they resent being tricked, and they hate being robbed - in that order; it's the same strategy Republicans have been using successfully (in their case, with boldface lies) for years: it begins with fear to grab the viewer, then taking umbrage to identify with the viewer, and finally telling the viewer who is  taking them to the cleaners now that the trust has been earned.  It's not something I pursued by design, but rather something I stumbled upon by accident; nonetheless, perhaps it's time someone applied that strategy honestly for a change, as the genuine sense of fear, umbrage, and thievery surrounding our murder by spreadsheet health care system is thoroughly legitimate and justified, and must continue to be brought to the attention of the electorate for the desperately needed public option to be signed into law.





                                              A Short Summary Of The List


(Please note, this shorter verson is ONLY for situations where something with only a few hundred words will do, like a letter to the editor, or situations where you know for a fact you only have thirty seconds or less to speak; if you have a bit more time to speak - even a minute in total, which is usually the case at these Congressional Town Halls - the Ten Talking Points List in full is considerably more effective than the summary, and this shorter version should really only be used if absolutely necessary.)

  1. If you've always paid your premiums on time, you're as likely to be dropped by a private insurance company when you need life-saving care as you are to get treated; even if you aren't dropped, they have the ability to overrule your doctor's advice for life-saving treatment and only offer to cover something cheaper.
  1. Private insurance companies are spending $1.4M a day to kill the public option, inventing phony citizen groups, and trying to scare the elderly about euthanasia and pro-lifers with abortion; they know the only way to kill reform is to get people of good conscience fighting each other, while they laugh all the way to the bank.  They don't think very highly of our intelligence.
  1. The average American family pays $16K/yr on health care while the avg. Canadian family pays less than $2K/yr, and businesses can no longer afford to provide insurance under the current system.  Every independent estimate says the public option will SAVE the government money, from anywhere between $150B (CBO) to $265B (Commonwealth).
  1. So - if you'd rather spend more taxpayer money, bankrupt businesses, AND pay $16K a year for your family's private insurance coverage in exchange for a policy that can be dumped the second you actually need it, then the current system is great for you.  If you'd rather spend less, have less of a chance of dying, and want to remove the corporate bureaucrat from between you and your doctor, then a public option is the way to go.




                      Rebuttals To The Ten Main Opposition Arguments At Town Hall Meetings


While the top ten list does well in painting a picture that eviscerates the main RW talking points on health care (whether the private system is really broken, the cost of the public option, waiting for health care, a bureaucrat between patient and doctor), there are still certain other recurring opposition arguments that will emerge at these meetings, and if you find them being repeated ad nauseum without being sufficiently rebutted by other citizens or the Congressperson, it is important to speak up and not let them go unchallenged to the ears of the undecided people present.  In those situations, the list below offers you thirty second or less rebuttals that will leave the opposition in stunned silence.  

A quick side note - in completing this list over the last couple of days, I came to the somewhat amusing realization that between the two lists, there is an ironclad retort to shoot down EVERY anti-public option argument you'll ever hear at these meetings; this exposes the opposition as only having so many arguments they must repeat ad nauseum, and only getting away with it because those arguments have thus far gone unchallenged by clear and concise rebuttals that beat them using their own reasoning, so if you can just logically shut each argument down one by one, they're completely out of gas.  I know, I know... some will argue that it's all about convincing undecideds at these meetings - it is - and that you couldn't convince most of the diehard opponents if you were to reason with them for all of eternity - you can't; however, you don't have to convince them, but simply stump them into silence on a point they seemed completely certain of just a moment ago, and watch them give the appearance of effectively forfeiting the point in front of undecideds.  That's the biggest victory possible at these things, in many ways; we often forget that the success of the RW in winning arguments on the airwaves in the eyes of undecideds from 2001-2004 was just as much due to the appearance of stumping Democrats into silence as it was due to language that appealed to undecideds, because watching two sides of the argument go back and forth gives the undecided person the impression that they've given the issue a fair hearing, and witnessed one side emerging as the more credible and confident in its side of the argument.  If you clearly and concisely score a point at these town halls that even momentarily stumps an opposition voice on their own ideological terms, it looks like a loss for the anti-public option side to every undecided in that room.  Never forget that.  It's not just about who is louder (as the yellers think), or about who can give the wonkiest speech with the most numbers (a trap progressives too easily fall into); it is about who can make a clear and compelling argument in less words than it would take to rebut it, and who appears more confident in doing so.




Now, without further ado...



  1. "Where In The Constitution Does It Say That We're Entitled to Universal Health Care?" - Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution says the Congress must provide for the general welfare of the United States; how can the Congress say it is providing for the general welfare when fifty people die a day that didn’t have to?  Now, I know - providing for the general welfare cannot be interpreted as every American being entitled to have the federal government to buy them a house, a bed, and fancy steak dinners every day; such broad interpretations would give Congress absurd powers, just as Madison correctly argued.  General welfare does NOT mean the federal government has to provide us with all our necessities, because such a system would NOT be capitalism - there we agree. HOWEVER, Congress’s obligation to provide for the general welfare under the Constitution, along with the Constitutional provision of equal protection under the law, DOES suggest that Congress has an obligation to ensure that people who work hard and save responsibly have an OPPORTUNITY to get those necessities; a system that has effectively been rigged over the years so that most people are one emergency away from having their insurance policy dropped and being unable to get coverage due to pre-existing condition, and given no options but death when extensive treatment is necessary, cannot be seen as consistent with our government’s role as defined by the general welfare clause and equal protection clause of the Constitution
  1. "I Am Against The Obamacare Bill!" - There is no Obamacare bill.  Obama doesn't have a bill in Congress, or even a bill in Congress he said he supports, so if you oppose "the Obamacare bill", you oppose a figment of your imagination.
  1. "Government Care Sucks; Reform What We Have First!" - Medicare and Medicaid are government run health insurance.  They have problems, they need reform, but every poll shows that people are more unhappy with private insurance than they are with Medicare and Medicaid by double digits, and it makes sense to put out the biggest fire first.  Most Americans aren't eligible for anything but private insurance anyway, so the idea that good solutions like reforming Medicare and malpractice lawsuits are enough on their own is just a slap in the face.
  1. "Just Look At The Mess In Massachussetts!" - Yes, just look at the mess in Massachussetts, a system where health insurance is mandated but still unaffordable and unreliable; it's what every Republican in Washington and every conservative in this meeting advocate when they demand the reform bill excludes a public option, because if you take the public option out of the bill, what's left is just insurance reform with mandates, which is nothing but a giant check to the insurance companies in exchange for FORCING Americans to buy unreliable and increasingly expensive insurance - just like in Massachussetts.  If you hate the system in Massachussetts so much, stop pushing for it.  Republican Governor Romney who signed that into law is the Republican party's establishment Presidential candidate going into 2012, while nearly every Republican in Washington has now said they willing to vote for mandated insurance if the public option is taken out just like in Romneycare.  And you have the nerve to tell public option supporters we should look at the mess in Massachussetts!  We're pushing for an alternative, while you're steering us full speed ahead towards Romneycare nationwide!
  1. "A Public Option Will Put Private Insurance Companies Out of Business!" - No, not if you believe the Congressional Budget Office, who says private insurance companies will get MORE business when a public option is passed.
  1. "Socialism!  I Believe In The Free Market!" - I believe that competition and more choices are good for the market. A public option is one more choice, and more options are good for the consumer and good for the market.  The public option bills being proposed let you keep your private plan if you want, and use the public option if you choose.  If the public option ends up being crap as some here think, people won't choose it - that's what our merit-based marketplace is all about - and if people don't choose the public option because private insurance is so much better, then no money in the program will be spent, and we've lost nothing; so this not a win or lose, but a win or break even, and you have to be pretty timid to be afraid of that.  Besides, if the market is our real concern, how can we compete with other countries if we believe that musicians, artists, and millions of self-employed low-level small businesspeople of all stripes should die because it’s their fault they couldn’t afford an exorbitantly priced private insurance policy; if our most creative minds don’t even deserve to live, how can we remain the country of the most innovation, and not be passed by?  With fifty people dying a day only in America and not among any of our Western competitors, what about the loss of productivity to our economy, the impact on the person’s family and the burdens placed on them, and the subsequent loss of consumer dollars in the marketplace due to the absence of the no longer existing consumer?
  1. "Big Money Interests Are Pushing The Public Option!" - If you want to be cynical and vigilant as a citizen against big money influencing the government, YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW THE MONEY.  On one side, there are BILLIONS of dollars at stake for the insurance companies, because they have the power to drop or deny anyone they please when they need urgent care in order to maximize their profits - of course they don’t want to give that up.  On the other side, you have no financial motive that could even compare - who stands to make billions from the public option?  Contributions to political candidates from unions only deal with money in the millions; they don't have billions of dollars at stake with anything like the insurance companies do.  So against the public option, you have a source of money, you have a motive, and you have planning and mass collusion by the insurance companies for decades to block any reforms, documented repeatedly by various non-partisan sources; on the other side, what even compares?  Being vigilant against big money interests screwing with legislation that affects the people is VITAL, and I applaud everyone here who does so - but you HAVE TO FOLLOW THE MONEY, or otherwise, for all you know, you're fighting against the very things you think you're fighting for.
  1. "I Don't Want To Be A Throwaway!" - Nothing in any bill allows the government to pick the time of death of any American, it would be illegal, and there would be no political gain to anyone in DC doing it in any party, so we really have to use our common sense here.  Right now, if you're an American and your insurance company drops you when you need urgent care, you can't get another policy due to pre-existing condition, and have no options but to die; the only reason that Americans over 65 don't have to worry about that is because of government programs like Medicare.  A public option would give all Americans that safety net.  Nobody should be a throwaway, but it will continue to happen at the rate of fifty dying a day until a public option is passed.  
  1. "This Bill Is Designed To Increase Abortions!" - It is not.  The President of the United States - whoever he is, whatever party he represents - is bound to uphold the law.  Health providers that receive federal funding must abide by federal law - this was true before this bill, it will be true after this bill, and with or without this bill - that's the law.  Roe vs. Wade is a decision many people of good conscience disagree on, but it is established legal precedent, and our elected officials must uphold the law until it is changed.  
  1. "BOOOOO!!!!" - I'm sure that all the people yelling and booing have been lucky, they've never seen someone get denied life-saving treatment or be dropped altogether by their insurance company - or had it happen to themself.  It would be easy for me to say that I hope you become one of those 14K a day who lose their health insurance so you can understand - but the truth is I hope none of you ever have to deal with that, I hope you never have to end up as one of those uninsured fifty people a day who die because they're refused the health care they needed to live.



                                                    Getting Your Arsenal In Order


When you attend your local town hall meetings, please feel free, welcome, and encouraged to print out copies of this newly updated Word document, containing the Top Ten Talking Points, sources, and author information all on one page, and containing Rebuttals to The Ten Most Common Opposition Arguments on another (for printing out on the back of the same page).  The initial page in particular is useful not only as a reference for when you speak but also for the purpose of leaving copies on the table at the beginning of the meeting for undecideds to take; I did this myself and my fiancee saw copies around the room during the course of the town hall, so it does work.  

If you are looking for additional effective information to print out and bring with you to leave as a hand-out, I recommend NWTerriD's list of how the public option benefits people personally, and I also recommend this awesome diagram which makes the case for the public option with thunderous simplicity and efficient minimalism, using the least amount of words and imagery possible.


Given the title of this diary, I can't end it without reminding everyone what to do at town halls where people are being disruptive to the point that others have to stop speaking for several seconds at a time; if this happens to you, do what I did, start off by using talking point two to disarm them directly:


(Note: If statements like those in my initial sentence do not apply to you, at least preface your comments by pointing out that you've lived in the district for years if that is the case.)


"I've been an independent voter most of my life, I've lived in this district for most of my life, and I've never been to a town hall before, but I'm here because I am appalled that the private insurance companies are spending over a million dollars a day to kill the public option, including paying off and bussing in phony citizen groups; this bothers me because there are people here from the district on both sides of this issue - for and against - while the sort of people who would bark and yell and prevent others from talking have been seen bussed in by insurance companies to town halls around the country, so we can tell right away who they are.  I suppose it's no surprise that it's happening, though - the insurance companies know the only way to kill the public option is to get people of good conscience fighting each other over lies about euthanasia and abortion and anything else that will work while they laugh all the way to the bank; these guys actually hire people that sit in rooms with focus groups and plan out "what lie would best target pro-life voters, what lie would best target the elderly, what misinformation is most effective as we take a knife and pare off sections of the public to fight amongst each other" - ANYTHING... to keep us distracted, while they laugh all the way to the bank.  They don't think very highly of our intelligence.  But I think that this year - this time - they're WRONG."    

After I made a comment similar to that one as the first audience remark during the town meeting I attended, the majority of the room erupted in applause, with only silence and no booing coming from the stunned wingnuts.

For the rest of the meeting, they still did make SOME noise and still talked back when they heard things they didn't like - but no longer loudly and abrasively enough to disrupt the meeting and interrupt anyone who spoke in favor of a public option to the point where the person had to stop talking.  Their cover was blown.  The meeting remained contentious, with the passion, drama, and - I must admit - entertainment value more reminiscient of a wrestling event than what one would picture as a local Democratic party town hall in sparsely populated area - but a contentious meeting and a dysfunctional meeting are worlds apart, and indeed at opposite ends; one is the ultimate expression of democracy, the other is the ultimate stifling of it.


GO TO THESE TOWN HALL MEETINGS AND CALL THEM OUT, using the same type of language, particularly including the "insurance companies don't think very highly of our intelligence"; they are not prepared to be called out, and it throws them off their game.  There was no doubt leaving the meeting I went to that the public option side in the room had won the debate, and that the opposition actually only represented 25-30% of the room - but the perception could have easily gone the other way had the meeting continued the way it started, with the minority sounding so loud it seemed to be a majority; calling these people out changes them from a fearless amorphous blob of noise that can easily be overestimated to a group of people who instead feel they have to stand and applaud at particular comments to get their viewpoint across, revealing their true numbers to all in the room.



Note that this approach to diffuse disruptions has a constructive effect on each of the three opposition groups identified at the outset of this diary AND undecideds; group 1 (the yellers) is exposed and doesn't want to risk exposing themselves further by making too much noise, group 2 (the misinformed) is given the one argument that might give them an outside chance of reconsidering their views on reform - the fact that they might be manipulated, group 3 (the libertarians) is flummoxed and thrown off balance because they don't want to be associated with the astroturfers or insurance companies, and undecideds respond to the possibility of manipulation and divisiveness with the same potential light bulb moment as group 2 but with an exponentially higher success rate.  

Best of all, those who show up just to cause trouble (Group 1) are pacified with this approach in one fell swoop, and if they still continue to disrupt, rebuttal #10 is waiting in your back pocket to finish them off.  Group 2 (the misinformed), if they still continue to doubt, can then be handled with rebuttals #8 and #9.  Group 3's arguments can be effectively countered for the duration of the meeting with rebuttals #1 - #7, while undecideds will best respond to The Ten Health Care Talking Points and - as mentioned before - the sight of confident opposition being stumped into silence by devastating rebuttals (moreso than to the strength of the rebuttals themselves).

Lastly as a general tip, when considering the broader dichotomy of how to best approach undecideds versus how to best approach diehard conservatives, always remember that - somewhat counterintuitive to the standard image of cool headed moderates versus passionate extremists (especially in light of town halls full of quiet attentive undecideds and rowdy far-right ideologues) - the fact is that undecideds generally glaze over at a recitation of figures unless they feel a personal connection to what is being explained, while diehard conservatives recoil at emotional appeals based on empathy and responds only to the cerebral; that's why the rebuttals list, despite its assertive tone, is entirely based on reason and not emotional appeal - and why The Ten Talking Points List, despite its reliance on figures, is more focused on painting a compelling picture that connects with the person.

Originally posted to ShadowSD on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 05:19 AM PDT.

Poll

Should this be posted every Monday morning to prepare everyone for the week of health care town halls ahead?

81%26 votes
18%6 votes

| 32 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (21+ / 0-)

    Please go to these town halls; showing up and adding your voice of reason to the crowd is half the battle.  When people say that these are the front lines in the battle for health care, they're not joking, and it's impossible to appreciate exactly how true that is until you've been to one and seen it for yourself.

    Private insurance companies only profit from denying health care, killing 20,000 Americans a year. A real public option ENDS the rationing of health care.

    by ShadowSD on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 05:18:48 AM PDT

    •  How about dealing with the origin (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      TexMex, soms

      of the madness, the insurance companies?  They have plenty of time and money to spare in flooding these townhalls with crazy people.  Whether or not we talk those nutters back from the ledge, they're just going right back up to it when they listen to Hannity or Beck or some other bullshit the very next day.  

      Eventually those batshits are going to decide it's patriotic to start shooting and bombing, and it will have been whipped up with the money the insurance industry extorted from the American people.  But are we in their faces?  Hell no, we're screaming at our own people.  It's the "I would rather protest on behalf of endangered bugs in San Francisco than on behalf of black people in Alabama" syndrome.

      "Water can flow, or it can crash. Be water, my friend." -Bruce Lee

      by Troubadour on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 05:35:04 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I just have to post this comment up top because (0+ / 0-)

        I just realized that the server with the Word document is down - and worse yet, the server admin is gone until Wednesday night.

        Does anyone have web space to post it on in the meantime?  Please reply to this comment to let me know, and I will e-mail it to you and fix the link in the diary to point there.

        Private insurance companies only profit from denying health care, killing 20,000 Americans a year. A real public option ENDS the rationing of health care.

        by ShadowSD on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 06:37:50 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Just showing up (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ShadowSD

      and quietly watching is good too.

      •  Agreed, even that can make some difference (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        casperr, soms

        As I alluded to above, even if one is not the sort to speak out in front of a large groups, showing up still adds one's voice of reason to the crowd in the sense that one is applauding the correct arguments made by others even if one does not speak themselves, and additionally, NOT applauding misinformation; these actions affect, albeit subtley, the impression the Congressperson gets of the support or opposition for the public option in the room.

        Private insurance companies only profit from denying health care, killing 20,000 Americans a year. A real public option ENDS the rationing of health care.

        by ShadowSD on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 06:23:03 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Well This Is Great But ... (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TexMex, ShadowSD, soms, KVoimakas

    My Congressmen and Senators aren't holding any more town halls.  It seems they've given up on them.  I called both my Congressman and Senator (I only have one Democratic Senator).  They're not doing the townhalls anymore.

    •  For the entire recess? (0+ / 0-)

      Perhaps they are just letting things die down for a couple of days, and then will be right back out there; many of the town halls from last week were, after all, often not announced until a day or two beforehand - so keep an eye out.

      Private insurance companies only profit from denying health care, killing 20,000 Americans a year. A real public option ENDS the rationing of health care.

      by ShadowSD on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 06:12:42 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  See my comment above (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ShadowSD, soms

      Help others find out about town halls they can attend.

      •  You're kidding right? (0+ / 0-)

        I'm a member of Organizing for America and I joined it specifically to get information on town halls and other such events relating to Health Care reform.  I'm back in the Green Party - and will never vote Democrat again because this whole effort has failed and will prolly take my primary issue - which is Cap and Trade - down with it.  It's a long story but that's the short version of why I'm pissed off.

        I attended the townhalls until my reps stopped having them.  I tried repeatedly to grab my Democratic friends and drag them to the events - but they had other things to do apparently.  Now - this is all after they convinced me last year that voting Green was a waste and that if I really wanted to inact change - I should vote Democrat.  Well I did that - and now that we need support at the townhalls - my Democratic friends are too busy to show.  Me and some Greenies attended some events - and we got ridiculed when we asked our questions.  

        The bottom line is every American can sign up for Organizing for America and it will TELL YOU were the events are.  I don't know anyone who doesn't have a computer and can't do this.  I DO know plenty of people who have lost interest though.

        And now I'm hearing that the Dems are giving up on the public option - if they run from this - they'll run from Cap And Trade too.

        Very sick of this - and all this is happening with huge Democratic majorities in both the House and the Senate.  If we can't do this now with these numbers - there's no hope we ever will.  When Democrats realise that it take RADICAL action to change things - I'm here for them.  Until then - they just a bunch of talkers.  The bottom line is that we should have organized against the Blue Dogs the moment they started barking ... That is what the Republicans do ... Hell - that is how we got Arlen Spector from them and I'll bet you a bag of doughnuts that wingnut votes with the GOP to drown this.

        IDIOTS!

        I'm not an environmentalist. I'm an Earth warrior.

        by V4 Rider on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 07:07:27 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  I'm sorry, it's great to be prepared (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ShadowSD, truesteam

    if you have a friend or colleague who wants to discuss the topic. But these people screaming at the town halls are NOT "legitimately concerned" people - none of them. Bussed in or not, they are fanatical democrat-haters, Obama-haters, racists, Beckians, LaRouchers, birthers, and deathers. No rational talking points will work with these folks, because they are not even open to considering facts.

    I'm in the pro-Obama wing of the Democratic Party.

    by doc2 on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 05:34:33 AM PDT

    •  I replaced legitimately with sincerely (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      soms

      Which I had meant to do earlier and forgotten; legitimately was a poor word choice.

      However, I think understanding the difference between those who are paid shills and those who are honest believers of minsinformation increases our ability to deal with both groups, whether stopping the former from shouting down other viewpoints, or challenging the misinformed so that they might doubt or reconsider their position even for a split second in front of undecideds who CAN be convinced, even if the misinformed cannot.

      Private insurance companies only profit from denying health care, killing 20,000 Americans a year. A real public option ENDS the rationing of health care.

      by ShadowSD on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 06:16:19 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  can some one pleeeese condense this (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    boadicea, truesteam

    into a one sheeter for dummies like me. As an expat with Canadian health care, (Sorry, my taxes pay for it.) But, I don't really understand all the stuff and I are smart. I appreciate all your hard work in writing this beautiful diary and I WILL go back and read it.  
    But I would like to see this diary distilled by someone "who gets it" into something 6 graders can read like the simplified list only a teeny bit more expanded. I can wade through this during my morning coffee, but a older person or a person that gets their info without reading (talk radio) will not read anything that looks like "hard work" even if they want to.

    I think this is one of the reasons that we don;t succeed in getting our message across. Us smartie pants love talking to each other but we need to reach people who DON"T  get it.
    Like Kos says you have to keep banging away at the message till it seeps in then you get a tidal wave.
    Lots of people are a lazy thinkers.  

    A sheet that can go viral and be printed up by people's own printers and get around the dead wood media.
    Or maybe somebody has already done that?

    •  Yawn! I would like to tip this comment. (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      TexMex, ShadowSD, soms

      But, I can't get my thought up off of the couch.

    •  We Get 150-200 Words for an LTE (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      TexMex, ShadowSD, soms

      And we probably don't get many more, surely not more than 2,000 words, speaking before the public with an elected rep present.

      Somehow I think that about 50 is the limit that will get through in a letter or call to a rep. In my experience aides have gone acoustically deer-in-headlights after my stating one yes-or-no position on one specific issue.

      This diary has 4,600 words.

      We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

      by Gooserock on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 05:46:51 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  VERY short version: (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        bmcphail

        "Those people are screaming because the arguments against reform are weak. They are being manipulated. Listen to factual information instead."

      •  But this diary consists of (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        soms
        - a Top Ten List that is very short and soundbite oriented.

        - an even more condensed version of that list specifically designed for a low enough word count to fit as a Letter To The Editor

        Are people just not bothering to read this diary?  I thought the Table of Contents was enough to pacify those of us who might prefer to skim over certain sections, and prevent people from missing the whole point of this diary: the need for clear and concise arguments.

        Private insurance companies only profit from denying health care, killing 20,000 Americans a year. A real public option ENDS the rationing of health care.

        by ShadowSD on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 06:26:56 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Just scroll down to the bottom section (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      TexMex, bmcphail, soms

      There are links to a Word document that condenses each of the two lists down to one page, just as you're requesting.  The whole point of this diary is to deal with short attention spans and lazy thinkers more effectively, instead of going on and on wonkishly without being clear and concise, a trap progressives too often fall into.

      Private insurance companies only profit from denying health care, killing 20,000 Americans a year. A real public option ENDS the rationing of health care.

      by ShadowSD on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 06:18:48 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks good points (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ShadowSD
  •  Quick question (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ShadowSD, soms

    Am I right in thinking that NOT reforming health care would have a larger impact on the budget deficit?

    As President Obama said, if we do nothing, we'll be spending a great deal more on health care than we would with reform... and it seems to me that the problems with Medicare and Medicaid would actually add more to the deficit if they are NOT reformed and cleaned up.

    If I'm right, wouldn't that also be an excellent point to make at these town halls?

    By the way - Alan Grayson is having a town hall in Orlando Florida tonight, but I don't drive and don't know if my roommate would be willing to go - so if anyone wants to carpool, I'd be happy to chip in some gas money!

    "Life is defined by how much you improve the lives of others." - Keith Olbermann

    by Diogenes2008 on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 05:43:27 AM PDT

  •  Can you make the talking points into an e-mail? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ShadowSD

    And e-mail it and post it to facebook?  

  •  reason and tactics. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ShadowSD

    It's hopeful of you to think that reasoned discourse can help.  Sadly, I think at this point that it's 9/10 theater. I don't think counter-disruptions at town-halls can help. What I'd love to see is a REALLY BIG march sometime in sept. Have we got the energy for one?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site