Skip to main content

Dear Sen Baucus, Sen. Grassley, Sen. Snowe, Sen. Bingaman, Sen. Conrad and Sen.Enzi:

I was pleased to hear Sen. Conrad state what has become painfully apparent in the last few weeks: there is not enough support for the "Public Option" for it to pass.  This plan had no natural constituency, being neither a single payor program nor market-based reform.

However, knowing that "Public Option" is (in the words of GEN Clark) "a plan that won't work" does not make Co-ops "a plan that might."  The following are some thoughts about how to achieve workable, market-based reform.      

  1.  One problem with the current system is that we need better buyers.  Employers are, as GM and Chrysler painfully demonstrate, better at their core competancies than they are as benefit managers.  Co-ops should not be payors.  That idea is mutual insurance companies and they largely don't work.  They should instead be buyers.  
  1.  The Co-ops should be self-insured ERISA-type plans, that are not built around employment.  They should be legally structured to be able to do things that self-insured Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") plans do: bargain with payors; contract with payors across state lines; have sufficient membership to lessen payors' reticence against insuring those with pre-existing conditions; and have the ability to design their plans around members' needs.  (The UAW does not need to cover elective plastic surgery, the Screen Actors' Guild might.)
  1.  They should be built around: existing not-for-profits that already offer insurance plans (e.g., AARP, Knights of Columbus, etc.); trade groups (e.g., Chamber of Commerce, AMA, ABA, Medical Group Management Association); and already existing union Multi-Employer Welfare Arrangements ("MEWAs").  This should not be "earn while you learn."
  1.  An organization called USAA in the auto insurance business and the Screen Writers' Guild Heath Plan should be the models, rather than rural electrification co-ops.
  1.  This will require substantial revision of ERISA and US department of Labor MEWA rules.
  1.  Ending state corporate practice/fee splitting laws and state laws against for-profit entities owning hospitals by application of the Commerce Clause would be an important addition to this bill.  Sophisticated commercial entities, like Wal-Mart, could make substantial progress in reducing cost, improving quality and expanding access if these artificial legal barriers, which effect the business of health care rather than the Practice of medicine, were removed.
  1.  Tort reform at the Federal level, however, is Constitutionally problematic.  These kinds of health and safety issues, the regulation of the practice of Medicine versus the regulation of the business of health care, are constitutionally within the purview of the states.
  1.  The same would be true of expanding the scope of practice of Nurse Practitioners ("NPs") and Physician Assistants ("PAs").  Expanded use of PAs and NPs could be a significant source of savings and a great boon to expanded access to health care.   In NY, NPs affiliated with Columbia University have their own practice.  In other states, these professionals' scope of practice is far more limited.  This is a clear burden on interstate commerce, but these practice restrictions are well within the health and welfare powers of the states.
  1.  If the states were to make Medical Malpractice actions administrative (rather than legal) actions, something like worker's compensation or disability cases without punitive or exemplary damages, and if compliance with evidenced-based medicine protocols were made a rebutable presumption of being within the standard of care, then much of the money lost each year to defensive medicine and much of the money lost in medical errors might be saved.  This, however, is an issue for the states.

In sum, work towards a co-op system is a positive first step toward real, valuable and constructive reform.  I remain

                                Sincerly,  John Minehan      

Originally posted to John Minehan on Mon Aug 17, 2009 at 07:48 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site