Skip to main content

A few comparisons from recent American history to keep in mind concerning health care reform.

For even a casual observer of current events and recent history like me, there are many parallels you can make with the current health care fight.  Of the two I'm thinking of right now, one has been argued prominently by Paul Krugman, and the other is so obvious as to be commonplace--but they're two ideas I think should very much be kept in mind.

The first parallel is between a public health care system, and public education.  Public schools as we know them were created in the 1800's, and our educational system rounded into form in the 1900's, with K-12 education, public universities and laws for mandatory attendance, funded by both state and federal tax dollars.  There is, of course, no constitutional mandate for this system, but it happens to be one of the biggest reasons for the United States' rise to world prominence.  Citizens of this country have (still! Despite the obstacles) the freedom to improve their livelihood by means of their own individual efforts (and this website is tremendous evidence of just that).  My education K-12 was public and I felt just as prepared going into college as anyone (meaning, I was shaking in my shoes, but I knew I'd done well in some tough classes).

Somehow, despite the presence of this unconstitutional, state-run industry, the United States has flourished as a country, and a parallel, privately-run industry of schools, from preschool to graduate, has also flourished.  Not only do public and private industries coexist, but the country is very possibly better for both.

Tell me, why is this not possible in the field of health care?

The second parallel is in the realm of bringing this proposed system into being, and my comparison is to the civil rights legislation of the '60's.  Civil rights is very possibly the most significant act our nation's Congress has ever produced, aside from the Constitution itself. It required real political heroism on the part of Lyndon Johnson and the Democrats he persuaded to follow him, to pass the series of bills, capped by the 1964 act, which liberated blacks and other minorities from many of the official restrictions on their lives.  It was as crucial a piece of human rights law as has ever been written.  Johnson was told, and knew, that the Democrats would "lose the south for 50 years" (another Krugman reference) if they passed that bill.  They did it anyway.  The nation and the world still thank them.

Passing health care now will require similar heroism.  Obama's stated that he wouldn't mind being a one-term President if he can pass health care reform--but he seems to waffle enough that he leaves those of us who desperately want him to succeed, to doubt his determination.  Passing health-care reform may well lead to a huge Republican backlash that will be felt in the next three elections.  So the question becomes even more urgent: isn't health care reform important enough to risk that?

Originally posted to agramante on Tue Sep 01, 2009 at 10:57 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I think it's important enough. (0+ / 0-)

    As are all the other issues put on the table by Obama's election campaign.  With all the issues together it would seem the focus of a revolution is in order.

    Efectus nihil profundus sub pensus est

    by Riddlebaugh on Wed Sep 02, 2009 at 12:56:31 AM PDT

  •  There is another parallel worth mentioning (0+ / 0-)

    Private education is not always better.  Private schools rely on donations and tuition to have the money to pay teachers and buy for the classroom.  Most of the time they get little federal or state money.  Public schools have the ability to do more because they get federal and state money and so the best teachers are with the best degrees are often drawn into public schools.  They also have more money to take care of their classrooms, buy books, and more technology.  Public schools are actually by far better than private schools (however, this is not to say that all private schools K-12 are bad they are just don't have the funding public schools do and so they are not able to do as much).

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site