Skip to main content

An interesting comparison from the Economist, regarding the election campaigns in Germany:

The Bavarian event was genuine, in a way that stage-managed American politics cannot match. There is a lot that is creepy about an American campaign event. Arriving early at Bush rallies, I would watch aggressive and chilly young Republican aides in smart suits kneeling on gymnasium floors with fistfuls of different felt tip marker pens, and large rectangles of white card. Frowning with concentration, they would then write things like "South Dakota Loves W" in deliberately babyish writing, or pick out the words "Hello Mr President" in red, white and blue lettering. The styles and slogans would be carefully varied, and the end results were impressive: a stack of signs that looked as though supporters of all ages had lovingly written them out on homely kitchen tables. Then, when the crowd arrived (all of them invited and vetted as bona fide Bush supporters) any of them who had forgotten instructions not to bring signs of their own would have them politely confiscated. Then they would be handed one of the ersatz home-made signs by one of the chilly, bossy young munchkins from campaign HQ. On television, it all looked very sweet.

I'm surprised I hadn't thought of this before; looking at those homespun, aw shucks signs you see in a lot of American campaign rallies, they often seem too good to be true, amateur expressions of devoted support expressed in heartfelt, but slightly naive terms. The idea that these signs are actually the purest and most cynical expression of astroturf is rather shocking to me. I suppose the problem might be that a lot of "amateur" signs might, in fact, look too professional; after all, if you're a supporter, you want to put in as much effort as possible into your signs, not just scrawl a barely-literate message onto some white card with a Sharpie. It suggests that those events which look most "amateur" (I am of course thinking principally at this moment of the 9/12 protests and other teabagger events) might, in fact, be the most cynically professional.

But it suggests you can't really trust any of these events, something I'd hate to do, because I really admire the fact that so many people in America are engaged in politics. (A hell of a lot aren't to a shocking degree as well, but that's by the by.) The sheer amount of work that goes into electing candidates by millions of people is something that most British or European parties probably look at with some degree of envy, where political party membership declines and parties more and more rely on a full-time managerial class to run their campaigns, instead of dedicated activists.

My experiences in campaigns here in Britain have been relatively sedate. I've done some campaign work for Labour in local council elections (grudgingly, out of a sense of familial obligation and a kind of nostalgia for a Labour Party with fighting for), and helped with some issue-based campaigns for the Scottish Socialist Party, a rather more left-wing organisation. Both times have rather paled in comparison with the mass-mobilisation of resources that occurs in America; a few leaflets put out, a few people spoken to in depth, petitions signed, in one unfortunate case handing out voting cards to people outside a polling station in the blazing sunshine until I passed out from sunstroke. As a massive elections geek, and someone deeply impressed by the breadth of American campaigns, I'd like to hear people's campaigning stories here; what drew you to campaigning, what happened, how did you stay motivated?

Originally posted to Freshly Squeezed Cynic on Mon Sep 14, 2009 at 05:05 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  How Do I Say This (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Freshly Squeezed Cynic, IreGyre

    It is all pretty much staged. On my professional blog I wrote a number of posts called "Bush Stagecraft" where I talked about the effort that went into events. As a marketing guy I always want complete control. At an event you have total control when your are the President of the United States. Bush was really good at it. Obama ain't too bad either.

    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

    by webranding on Mon Sep 14, 2009 at 05:17:42 AM PDT

  •  Were is the Penn & Teller of Politics (0+ / 0-)

    While governing they show everyone how the tricks are done... emphasizing it with illustrations/videos/ and insider stories from previous administrations...

    so that people will be more immune to fakery and illusion and control tactics... and any subsequent office holders will either have to come up with new ways to do the tricks or just be more honest... and maybe people will be more entertained by the reality... know what to look for and stay more engaged...

    Pogo & Murphy's Law, every time. Also "Trust but verify" - St. Ronnie (hah...)

    by IreGyre on Mon Sep 14, 2009 at 08:51:22 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site