According to pundit, Dems lose in VA and NJ is a referendum on Obama even though voters said otherwise, but Pundits don't care. They say it's about Obama so it's about Obama
Then If you follow their logic, since Miss Purity from Alaska endorsed Hoffmann, pushed the Rep candidate out of the race, isn't the NY_23 congressional race a referendum on Palin ?
So since Owens won the district of 49% of the vote, I declare it was a referendum on Sarah Palin. And once again the US reject Palin. I really hope that Teabaggers and their Queen Palin challenge Charlie Crist in Florida. Cause if the teabaggers oust Crist during the primary, Dems will have greater chance to win the senate seat. If we are lucky, the GOP primary will get nasty and ugly, the republican will be divided and bitter at the end of the process. The DNC better pick a viable candidate on this, someone who can actually win.
I know tomorrow that the MSM will concentrate their coverage on VA and NJ to find a way to somehow bash Obama. They are already saying that Corzine and Deeds' defeats were a sort of referendum on Obama. They don't care if 55% of virginians voters said Obama wasn't a factor and 60% in NJ.
Everytime I hear "Tea Party" I have this image of Eric Cartman in South Park having a tea party with his dolls LOL