In an interview with the Fort Worth Star Telegram yesterday, Barbara Ann Radnofsky, Democratic candidate for Texas Attorney General, noted the massive error in a constitutional amendment that was passed in 2005 that appears to ban all Texas marriages.
Texans: Are you really married?
Maybe not.
Barbara Ann Radnofsky, a Houston lawyer and Democratic candidate for attorney general, says that a 22-word clause in a 2005 constitutional amendment designed to ban gay marriages erroneously endangers the legal status of all marriages in the state.
The amendment, approved by the Legislature and overwhelmingly ratified by voters, declares that "marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman." But the troublemaking phrase, as Radnofsky sees it, is Subsection B, which declares:
"This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage."
Architects of the amendment included the clause to ban same-sex civil unions and domestic partnerships. But Radnofsky, who was a member of the powerhouse Vinson & Elkins law firm in Houston for 27 years until retiring in 2006, says the wording of Subsection B effectively "eliminates marriage in Texas," including common-law marriages.
She calls it a "massive mistake" and blames the current attorney general, Republican Greg Abbott, for allowing the language to become part of the Texas Constitution. Radnofsky called on Abbott to acknowledge the wording as an error and consider an apology. She also said that another constitutional amendment may be necessary to reverse the problem.
"You do not have to have a fancy law degree to read this and understand what it plainly says," said Radnofsky, who will be at Texas Christian University today as part of a five-city tour to kick off her campaign.
The constitutional amendment bans all Texas marriages. Please note that neither the Attorney General or the Liberty Legal Institute dispute Barbara Ann's legal analysis. Instead the Attorney General's office says that the AG will defend the constitutionality of a constitutional amendment which appears to ban all Texas marriages.
Abbott spokesman Jerry Strickland said the attorney general stands behind the 4-year-old amendment.
"The Texas Constitution and the marriage statute are entirely constitutional," Strickland said without commenting further on Radnofsky’s statements. "We will continue to defend both in court."
Here is the language from the 2005 amendment:
Sec. 32 MARRIAGE. (a)Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.
(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Please visit the website to learn about more of General's Abbott's mistakes including how he enabled Tom Delay's mid-decade redistricting.
There's also a great video worth checking out.