Skip to main content

Alright, here's the score.  The Senate, barring some unforeseen circumstance, is going to pass a health care bill.  Yes, it sucks.  No public option, no Medicare buy-in.  It's a steaming turd.

So we have a choice here.  We can freak out and run around in circles, or we can push our Congresscritters, who'll soon be negotiating in conference committee, to get some final improvements in the last revisions to the bill.

So what can we accomplish?  Where is there room for us to work?

I love the idea of the public option, and of single-payer, and think the Medicare buy-in was a great idea for a compromise.  But Joe Lieberman and Ben Nelson cockblocked those ideas.  They're not gonna happen.  It sucks, but we want to redirect our energy to somewhere where we can get results.

Where is that direction?

Regulation.

Think about it.

Who here likes dealing with their health insurance company? (Assuming you have the means to get health insurance...)  Nobody.

Health insurance companies in America are HATED!!!

That's why there's so much of a backlash over the dropping of the public option - they were the means to check the price-gouging and the abusive behavior of the insurers.  That's why there's so much hate for mandates - it's basic emotion - we're being required by law to fork over our hard-earned cash to these organizations which we HATE, and that pisses us off!

Because we hate those fuckers and are tired of being scalped by them.

This means that regulation is POPULAR.

Any new provisions that put checks on the ability of insurers to screw us will be greeted with cheers from the voters.  Anything that will force them to pay out more, get us more health care, and keep them from screwing us will be hard to resist.  Any resistance to tightened regulation this late in the game will result in immediate backlash.  That gives us power.  Regulate 'em!

And regulation is still in the final bill.  At least some form of ban on pre-existing conditions clauses is still in the bill, as is the ban on rescission of sick people, as is the ban on lifetime and annual benefit caps.

They can be strengthened.  And they have been strengthened.  Because we made a huge amount of noise in the backlash to the stripping of the public option, Reid did put some things like the annual cap ban back in the bill.  There's room here for us to demand more improvements.

We can demand that the age-based pricing cap (currently old people would pay 3 times more than young people) be tightened up.  We can demand removal of the loopholes in the community rating provisions.  We can demand more oversight of insurers and more penalties for insurers that behave badly.  We can demand that the out-of-pocket maximums be reduced.  We can demand that insurers pay 85+% of the bills instead of 60%.

While we're at it, demand some sunshine laws - regulatory actions need to be public, and out of the smoke-filled rooms.  That includes appeals of denials, actions to fine misbehaving insurers, etc.  We've got a lot of regulatory capture, and transparency can make it harder for regulators to turn a blind eye to abuses.  Make some rules where insurance industry executives and employees are not allowed to be employed as regulators, and vice versa - lock the revolving door!

While we're at it, try to get the anti-trust exemption revocation back in the bill - it has a chance of making it, since it has a lower profile than the public option or the coathanger amendments, and Ben Nelson might not be able to make slick-sounding excuses for cockblocking the bill over anti-trust like he could for abortion or public-option.

There's where we've got to focus our political pressure - to tighten up the regulations on price-increases, on discrimination against sick people, on all the bad behavior of the insurers.  There's still room to regulate the fuckers, and that's what we need to do.

The bill sucks, but there's still room left to make the bill less sucky.

Originally posted to meldroc on Sun Dec 20, 2009 at 06:19 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (5+ / 0-)

    I agree with you. I want to do it. Now make me do it! - Franklin Delano Roosevelt http://meldroc.com/

    by meldroc on Sun Dec 20, 2009 at 06:19:36 PM PST

  •  Regulate the Fuckers...I like that Motto (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    caduceus4

    Let's do it!

    "GOP, Grandstand Oppose Pretend" (Rep. Ed Markey, November 7, 2009). Oh, and in case we forget...Blue Dogs Suck!

    by cyeko on Sun Dec 20, 2009 at 06:29:23 PM PST

  •  Regulation, regulation, regulation (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    caduceus4

    Anti-trust laws, etc.  And pass a public option or a medicare buy-in via reconciliation after the bill is passed (and after Lieberman and Nelson lose all their perks).  Coathanger amendment removed via signing statement, since it is sure to receive a constitutional challenge.

    Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it. --Mark Twain

    by SottoVoce on Sun Dec 20, 2009 at 06:37:51 PM PST

  •  My crystal ball says... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    caduceus4

    wait to see what is in the final bill, and then live to fight another day. It's never, ever, ever over.

  •  fine if Dems stay in power, but Repugs can wreck (0+ / 0-)

    some of these features: nationwide policies and preemption, independent Medicare board, abortion restrictions, and a few others, could be used to nefarious purposes by any future Repug government.

    •  I still say regulation is worthwhile. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      caduceus4

      Like I said, it's one of those areas that hasn't yet been set in concrete into the final bill, so there's potential for tightening things up.

      Yes, of course, if the Rethugs get in power, they can refuse to enforce the regulations, but pulling that kind of crap can come at a political cost, and make it easier for us to throw them out.

      I agree with you. I want to do it. Now make me do it! - Franklin Delano Roosevelt http://meldroc.com/

      by meldroc on Sun Dec 20, 2009 at 07:08:17 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Public Option was popular (0+ / 0-)

    That didn't stop Congress from killing it.

    Not sure why you think real regulation of insurance companies will be any different. There will not be a swell greater than for the public option.

    The crooks are leaving have left office, unprosecuted and scot-free.

    by BentLiberal on Sun Dec 20, 2009 at 11:46:45 PM PST

    •  It's a smaller leap to make. (0+ / 0-)

      For the bastards in Congress, the public option was a pretty big leap.  Incrementally tightening regulations is a smaller thing.  A still worthwhile thing, but a smaller thing, that serves as a foot in the door.  Tighten regulation here, build more oversight there.  A lot of senators that would throw hissy-fits over the public option won't say anything about tightening the regulation a notch or two.

      I agree with you. I want to do it. Now make me do it! - Franklin Delano Roosevelt http://meldroc.com/

      by meldroc on Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 07:18:47 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  It's also much easier to fake (0+ / 0-)

        Regulations can be ineffective, ignored, weak or some combination - they are often written that way by the lobbyists who craft them.

        The crooks are leaving have left office, unprosecuted and scot-free.

        by BentLiberal on Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 07:11:52 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site