Skip to main content

Urgh, why do we have to write intros - without formatting.

This diary is based on a piece today in The Guardian written by Dean Baker who is co-director at The Center for Economic and Policy Research. He takes on Washington Post for an article they published in their last issue of the decade.

It was a piece written by an interest group - or more precisely written by a group funded by one Fat Wall Street Cat - and disguised as an ordinary news article. And it seems Washington Post are going to have more of these articles.

Via Economist's View I came to read an article by Dean Baker in the Guardian today. Baker is co-director at The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR)

Here he really takes on Washington Post:

In its last issue of the decade, it published as a news piece an article: by the Peter Peterson Foundation-funded Fiscal Times. This compromised the Post's journalistic integrity to the extent that readers can no longer take it seriously.

The Fiscal Times piece was indistinguishable in its appearance from any other news story in the Washington Post. Only those careful to read the byline or the note at the bottom of the page would realize that the article was not a regular news story. Nowhere is the Fiscal Times identified as being affiliated with, and funded by, the Peter Peterson Foundation.

(Later info seems to indicate that the Fiscal Times is founded directly by Peterson, not his foundation).

Baker tells about Peterson:

Peter Peterson is a Wall Street billionaire and former Nixon administration cabinet member who has been trying to gut social security payments and Medicare for at least the last quarter of a century. He has written several books that warn of a demographic disaster when the baby boomers retire. These books often include nonsense arguments to make his case.

He also links to a New York Times article on Peterson from 2008. According to that article:

Mr. Peterson has just reaped a $1.8 billion profit from Blackstone’s public offering

On Friday, Mr. Peterson will unveil the Peter G. Peterson Foundation and announce his plan to allocate his newfound billions to projects that will increase public awareness of fiscal imbalances, Social Security deficits and nuclear proliferation.

One of his ideas at the time was:

working with HBO on a documentary film adaptation of his book "Running on Empty," in the hope that the American public wakes up to the dangers of deficits and entitlement spending as it did to global warming after Al Gore’s film "An Inconvenient Truth."


Washington Post has now put up an online correction to the Fiscal Times article:

The article by the Fiscal Times, about growing congressional support for a bipartisan commission to address the nation's debt, contained a statement supporting the concept by Robert L. Bixby, the executive director of the Concord Coalition. The article should have noted that the Concord Coalition receives funding from the Peter G. Peterson Foundation. Peterson, but not his foundation, also funds the Fiscal Times, the independent news service (sic) that prepared the article.

In the article Concord Coalition is described as

a nonpartisan group that advocates entitlement reform and balanced budgets


And it seems like this article is just the first of many more Fiscal Times articles to be posted in the Washington Post. According to this piece

The Fiscal Times and the Washington Post have agreed to jointly produce content focusing on budget and fiscal issues that will be available to both publications. The content will complement the Post's budget and finance coverage, and will include profiles of key government officials, explanations of important budget trends or proposals and investigative analysis of government spending programs.

And of course the self-proclaimed goal of this one-man funded interest organization is nothing less than

to become the most trusted news source for unbiased journalism covering government policy and economic issues

Originally posted to Mariken on Tue Jan 05, 2010 at 06:27 AM PST.


Do you trust the Post's budget and finance coverage ?

13%5 votes
75%27 votes
11%4 votes

| 36 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site