Skip to main content

In a recent unanimous decision, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned federal bribery charges against prominent Mississippi trial attorney Paul Minor, offering a ray of hope that Minor will soon be a free man.

Minor has spent the past three years a political prisoner, left to rot in jail after partisan operatives in the Bush administration targeted him for being the top funder of Democratic candidates in Mississippi.

Read more at Huffington Post.

In a recent unanimous decision, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned federal bribery charges against prominent Mississippi trial attorney Paul Minor, offering a ray of hope that Minor will soon be a free man.  

Minor has spent the past three years a political prisoner, left to rot in jail after partisan operatives in the Bush administration targeted him for being the top funder of Democratic candidates in Mississippi.  Minor was convicted in 2007 along with John Whitfield and Walter "Wes" Teel, the Mississippi Democratic judges he was wrongly accused of bribing through campaign contributions that were perfectly legal and common practice among donors of all political persuasions in the state.  Among the charges against Minor were federal bribery and honest services fraud, for which Minor received a draconian 11-year sentence that he is now serving at federal prison camp in Pensacola, Florida.  

Minor and the judges appealed immediately, arguing that jury instructions were botched in the trial, allowing jurors to incorrectly convict without evidence of a clear and unambiguous exchange of official acts for the contributions, or quid pro quo, between the judges and Minor.

In the wake of the Fifth Circuit ruling, which reversed the federal bribery charges, Minor will now have his case sent back to the lower court for re-sentencing.  

That's great news for justice in America, but the fact is that Paul Minor should be at home with his family already.  By knocking out the key charge that was misused to convict Minor for federal bribery, the Fifth Circuit court has provided more than ample proof that Minor raised substantial questions on appeal, as his attorneys have long argued.  The law clearly states that an appellant deserves to be free on bail awaiting the outcome of his appeals process if substantial questions have been raised.  

The Justice Department, both under the Bush administration and now under President Obama, has failed to release Minor despite this obvious discrepancy.  The DOJ's disregard for Minor's right to release has had severe consequences on his life.  

Over the past three years that Minor spent in prison, he endured the loss of his wife Sylvia to brain cancer, a painful ordeal in which he was repeatedlydenied release to be by his wife's side by the Bureau of Prisons, a subordinate arm of the DOJ.  Paul's right to comfort Sylvia, to say goodbye in her final hours, and even to attend her funeral to deliver the eulogy he wrote about their 40-year marriage together, was stripped by the DOJ.  Minor also remained behind bars when his son Paul Jr. was married in October, yet another important family moment this proud father will never get back.

Why was Paul Minor left rotting in jail while Sylvia passed away and Paul Jr. married?  And now, with the federal bribery charges tossed out, why is he still behind bars today?

Attorney General Eric Holder had barely gotten his office set up when he ordered the Justice Department to drop charges against former Alaska Senator Ted Stevens based on prosecutorial misconduct, vowing to send a message that misconduct would not be tolerated in President Obama's DOJ.

Yet the American justice system's abhorrent treatment of Paul Minor has often been far more absurd, consistently unjust and shockingly inhumane.  So why is Paul Minor continually left to rot in Pensacola federal prison camp?

Former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman, convicted on similar honest services charges as Paul Minor, was granted release after raising 'substantial questions' in his own appeal and given the chance to reunite with his family as he continues to argue his innocence.  Why has Paul Minor not received the same treatment while his appeal progresses?  

Those are all valid questions that Attorney General Eric Holder and the Justice Department must ultimately answer, as soon as possible for Mr. Minor's sake.  

For those not familiar with the background of this case, Paul Minor's "crime" was that he took a particular interest in the outcome of judicial races in his home state of Mississippi, an obvious concern for a trial lawyer hoping to ensure that his clients would face only fair judges.  As long as judges are elected, they will rely on campaign contributions from all vested interests, including lawyers, and those contributors have every right to donate within the bounds of campaign spending laws.  As the Jackson Free Press correctly stated in a recent editorial, "critics scream that Minor was out to install pro-plaintiff judges, and they may have a point--but that, in itself, was not illegal."

Apparently, Paul Minor's legal campaign contributions were viewed through a different lens.  The make-up of the Mississippi judiciary also happened to be of high importance to powerful business interests, most notably the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which sunk millions into efforts to install industry-friendly judges throughout the South.  Taking down a man like Paul Minor - the top funder of the Democratic judges whom the Chamber and its ilk despise - was a major coup for Big Business and its friends in Washington during the Bush administration.

The impact of Minor's conviction was felt immediately, casting a chilling effect on Democratic fundraising, particularly among judicial candidates.  Many traditional Democratic donors now shy away from the contested races for fear of ending up in Minor's shoes.

The way in which federal bribery and honest services fraud charges were used in the Minor case has huge First Amendment implications, potentially threatening the rights of - and leading to the possible conviction and incarceration of - any elected politician who accepts a campaign donation.  If you're keeping score at home, that would mean every U.S. Congressman, the President, even local school board candidates.  In other words, every American citizen engaged in the campaign finance process.

A Ray of Hope
Regardless of the DOJ's failure to apply the bail statute law equally, there is plenty of reason to suspect that Minor will soon be free.  Minor's re-sentencing may be deemed unnecessary as the U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on the constitutionality of the "honest services" law that constituted the other major federal charge against Minor.

Legal experts believe that recent comments made by Supreme Court Justices reveal the overwhelming likelihood that the high court is set to rule the "honest services" charge unconstitutional, which would undermine the entire basis of the remaining charges against Minor and the former Mississippi judges.

Critics from all ideological persuasions have railed against the honest services law, arguing that it affords federal prosecutors far too much power to target their political enemies, or anyone else for that matter.  

Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. agrees that honest services is flawed, noting that the public "has to be able to understand the law, and if it can't, it is invalid."

Even über conservative Justice Antonin Scalia has pointed out the absurdity of the statute, saying recently that honest services amounts to a law that says, "Nobody shall do bad things."  Scalia joked that it could even make a crime out of an employee phoning in sick so he could slip off to a baseball game.

"The vague honest services statute has created a legal twilight zone and nightmare that no citizen or public official would want to be faced with defending--whether they are Democratic or Republican," Minor's attorney Hiram Eastland recently told reporters.

Columbia University law professor Scott Horton, who has extensively covered Minor's saga for Harper's magazine, recently said that "it's clear that a solid majority of the [Supreme Court] justices think the honest-services fraud statute is unconstitutional," and predicted that Minor would soon be a free man.  "It will take a few months for this to work its way out, but it's clear that Minor and his co-defendants are on their way home," Horton predicts.

Horton is correct.  But in the meantime, Attorney General Holder should immediately release Minor on bail pending the resolution of his case, and then continue a deeply needed investigation into the politicization of the Justice Department during the Bush/Cheney/Rove reign.

Otherwise, failure to apply the law equally, and failure to live up to their campaign promises to restore integrity and public trust, may be the Obama Justice Department's unfortunate legacy.

Originally posted to bdemelle on Tue Jan 05, 2010 at 10:40 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Is He In Prison Having Been Sentenced (4+ / 0-)

    or is he in jail awaiting trial?  Are the charges he's serving sentence for completely overturned?

    If he's in Prison for the same bribery charges that were thrown out, why wouldn't he have automatically been released?

    I do not understand.

  •  It makes me feel ashamed (5+ / 0-)

    Attorney General Holder has been good on some issues, but he has been in abject surrender to the Karl Rove team in deep Dixie. And it makes me feel ashamed.

  •  So SCOTUS will be freeing Enron's Skilling. . . (0+ / 0-)

    when Scalia, Alito et al. overturn the "honest services" provision so that Paul Minor can get out?  Skilling is the one who brought the case to the Supremes.  The conspiracy theorists will have another field day with this one: Bush DOJ really screws up prosecutions so their people get released after the public forgets what they did in the first place.  Minor should be freed, but not at the expense of the "honest services" law.  If anybody deserves to be in prison forever on that law, it's Skilling and Fastow, for starts.

    Aborticentrism-- the closer life gets to being your responsibility, the less sacred it becomes

    by cgregor on Wed Jan 06, 2010 at 04:00:08 AM PST

  •  Nothing is more dangerous... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    to our nation's democracy than the misuse of official legal process to punish political opponents.  

    Perversion of the rule of law to use it as an enforcement mechanism is a frequent tactic taken by would-be dictators all over the third world.  Africa is full of brave democratic opposition politicians beaten by police and thrown into horrific conditions in jail to protect a big daddy dictator.

    To think that an American political party would adopt such tactics is terrifying.  To believe that a reform party, led by a charismatic leader, having won election in the face of such illegal and immoral election-stealing conduct, and then refuse to dig out the rot and put it where it belongs is worse.

    I hope those who planned this despicable act, those who carried it out, and the top leaders who gave their OK for it to proceed are all prosecuted for their illegal twisting of our system of justice.  Prison and bankruptcy are what they deserve.

    Ordinary people are being arrested on the say-so of dogs in traffic stop conditions, while conspirators attempting to overthrow our form of government circulate in tuxedos at fund-raising parties.  My mind reels at how un-American we have already become!


Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site