The recent five-to-four Supreme Court decision allowing unlimited political campaign contributions is an egregious, malignant attack on the one-man one-vote principle that is a key starting point for democratic government. So far as I can tell, there is only one legal remedy for this act, namely, an amendment to the Constitution. Below, I suggest a version of the 28th Amendment.
The 28th Amendment.
The First Amendment prohibition for Congress against abridging freedom of speech notwithstanding, Congress may apply freedom of speech restrictions to corporate entities.
I imagine there are alternative or better wordings, so please suggest some.
Edited diary.
The Supreme Court has previously ruled that an individual may spend any amount of money to finance their campaign because of First Amendment rights - the expenditure of money is taken to be a form of free speech. I think this is crazy, but it seems simpler to leave that issue alone and instead to prevent campaign contributions by corporate entities by restricting the free speech of such entities.