Skip to main content

Yes, it is a radical suggestion.  But, these are radical times, so suggesting it is not so radical.  But, nonetheless radical enough for the times, if you see my meaning.

The House should begin impeachment proceedings against all Nine Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.

If you are still with me, follow below.  Watch where you step though, I didn't have a lot of time to straighten up, and the cleaning lady didn't show up this week.

Think of the boldness of it.  The Congress responds, forcefully, to the Supreme Court daring to oppose it's (the Congress') will.  I am talking, of course, of Citizens United.  The Congress passed McCain-Feingold, where do them old folks sitting around in their monochromatic robes get off striking it down.

(As an aside, speaking of monochromatic- why is it that all the men in the audience during the State of the Union wear dark suits, while all the women have to wear red.  Is it some sort of modern day scarlet letter?  Have all these women- gasp - strayed?  The mind wanders)

Okay, sorry about that, told you I had no time to clean up the place.  Normally wouldn't leave that thought out there for others to see.

So, where was I?  Ah yes, Congressional revenge.  You strike down our laws, you sleep with the fishes.

(Do fish actually sleep?  If you are sleeping while surrounded by fish who are awake, can you really be said to be sleeping with the fishes?  Oh, and plural of fish is fish.  Same as reindeer.  Another quick fact- dolphins are not fish.  Neither are seals.  Or reindeer)

And the political advantage is just too great- sure, we'd lose some good, progressive voices from the court.  But, who would be picking their replacements- PRESIDENT OBAMA.  That's right, he could pick all nine.

Ah, you say, but the Senate has to confirm, so the Republicans will have to go along with this.  Hee, hee, that's the best part of all- THE REPUBLICANS DON'T BELIEVE IN FILIBUSTERING JUDGES.  They'll just have to suck it up.

Oh, but what if they then don't go along with impeachment, knowing that President Obama is going to pick the replacements.  The answer is simple- we just don't tell them this until after the removal votes, when it will be too late.

Of course, you can't just go an impeach SCOTUS justices willy-nilly.

(Had a stray thought related to willy-nilly, but managed to kick it under the couch before anyone could see it).

Anyway, we are going to need some reasons to remove all nine.  Here's what I've got:

Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Stevens- did you know that they didn't even show up for the SOTU last night.  Word is, they thought it was going to conflict with a new episode of American Idol, so they stayed home.

(Justice Scalia has been asked not to watch American Idol, BTW, in case an appeal of the final vote ever makes it's way to the Supreme Court.  He watches anyway, and says he won't recuse himself.)

How dare they!!  What a slap to the face of the President, and the Congress.  Could have at least sent a card, or a telegram, or a cardboard cut out of themselves. IMPEACH THEM!!!

Justice Kennedy, who authored the recent decision.  Did you know he isn't really a Kennedy?

(Did you know that dolphins aren't fish?  Oh, yeah...)

IMPEACH HIM.  False advertising.  Only Kennedy's are allowed to be Kennedy's.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg.  People who use three names in their daily lives are suspect from the get go.  IMPEACH.

Justice Breyer.  Ben and Jerry's is far superior.  IMPEACH.

Justice Sotomayor.  She's just a probie, we don't need a reason.  IMPEACH.

Chief Justice Roberts- he's responsible for all of the above.  IMPEACH.

Finally, that leaves Justice Alito.  Surely, there must be a reason to impeach him as well.  Maybe someone else could diary on that?

UPDATE:  From the AP- The Supreme Court has now chosen to overturn 100 years of precedent and ruled that dolphins are, indeed fish.  Some analysts say this ruling was expected, given the Court's finding several years back in Pluto vs the rest of the stuck up planets who want it out of the club.  Justice Stevens wrote a short, scathing dissent in which he penned "I am not even sure why I come to work in the morning anymore.  We're just making shit up these days".

AN EVEN NEWER, BETTER UPDATE:  Okay, my last student has handed in his exam, I am really tired, long friggin day, which I use as my excuse for some of the lame attempts at humor in this diary.  (The successful attempts, however, I take full credit for).  I will no longer be responding to comments below, sorry to snark and run, but I would like to see my wife during her waking hours (no fish involved in the sleeping).  Please, feel free to continue to wander about and poke around, make lots of comments, I want to have more comments in my diary than in the damn Roger Ebert diary that is right below mine on the front page.  Get it done!!!

FINAL UPDATE:  Made it home alive.  Wife already asleep.  Oh, well.

Originally posted to JakeC on Thu Jan 28, 2010 at 04:28 PM PST.

Tags

Poll

What is wrong with the above idea

100%25 votes

| 25 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site