Skip to main content

We all know that Chris Dodd, a politician with normally progressive instincts, is somewhat suspect when it comes to the financial industry. He isn't a Blanche Lincoln or Ben Nelson, not even close. But he tends to give the "views" of the financial industry more weight when crafting legislation than he would any other industry.

It's with this backdrop that his posture over the past month has started to concern me. It began with him  scrapping his originally proposed legislation for Financial reform, which was similar to what the House passed, in order to get bipartisan support and get Richard Shelby, of all people, to join in. The moment he announced his desire to have legislation Shelby could endorse I had serious doubts about Dodd's seriousness in actually fixing the problem with with a good reform bill. Shelby, for those who don't know, is an extreme free market conservative. To his credit, he was willing to let the banks go down in the fall of 2008 with the belief that the free market would take care of itself. Thats how gung-ho this guy is about his free market principles, he doesn't leave much room to negotiate. So right off the bat we knew anything he would accept would have to be watered down and for all intents and purposes useless.

Then 2 weeks ago a story broke that Dodd was planning on scrapping the proposed Consumer financial protection agency in order to, not surprisingly, appease Shelby:

Senate banking committee Chairman Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) has discussed jettisoning plans for a standalone Consumer Financial Protection Agency, as part of an effort to secure bipartisan support for legislation to reform financial regulation, said people familiar with the matter.

Soon after this news filtered out, Elizabeth Warren, a big champion of the CFPA, started speaking out and shortly met with the Obama administration. Then Obama himself held a one on one with Dodd in which he reportedly told him the CFPA was non-negotiable. So we started hearing less of this idea and it seemed that was the end of that.

But then earlier this week Dodd, in what seems like the result of 2 weeks of bottled frustration, lashed out against the administration saying the Volker rule was too ambitious and could derail financial regulation, that the president was attacking the banks too much and that the administration has not been taking his advice on the proper way to get financial reform done. It was pretty amazing to see Dodd actually publicly make a sympathetic plea for the banking industry, who I'm sure has been harassing him non-stop.

Thanksfully, it seems because his hand was forced on the CFPA, him and Shelby are at an impasse and for now, the idea of a bipartisan plan on financial regulation may be dead. But I'm getting very concerned because its starting to become obvious that Dodd's instincts are not to get the best reform package possible but something else, maybe a political victory instead of a policy one.


Please call Dodd @ (202) 224-2823. Tell him we will not accept some watered down version of reform...or, to coin an old phrase, lipstick on a pig.

Originally posted to ai002h on Fri Feb 05, 2010 at 02:07 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site