Skip to main content

This week, the five of us who helped found Peanut Butter PAC are focusing our attention on Jennifer Brunner in keeping with this week's unofficial theme.   I hope to be able to get Brunner's position on the Patriot Act by this Friday.  I have contacted her campaign about it and am still awaiting a reply.  Since it is Wednesday and the middle of the work week, I figured it was a good day to tackle what each Ohio Senate Candidate plans on doing about the jobs problem.  It should certainly be the number 1 priority for Democrats once health care reform is put to bed for this year.

I will start with Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner.  Her Jobs page is top under Issues.

Jobs are the number one issue in my campaign. But jobs can't be considered in a vacuum. Issues like health care and fair trade policies go hand in hand with developing a sustainable recovery in Ohio and stable communities for the years to come.

There is no silver bullet for creating new and better jobs. It will take cooperation among many levels of government, business and even advocacy groups to grow Ohio's economy again.

Brunner is correct in that health care reform done right would save jobs and even help create new ones as premiums would be brought under control, as insurance rate increases have hurt small businesses and have eaten into already flattened wages.   Trade polices are also important to look at as NAFTA incentivized big corporations to move their factories to Mexico and left behind hard-working American workers for non-union Mexican workers.   Brunner tend goes on to explain that Ohio's unemployment rate is at 10.9% and explains more about health care reform and starts on what is needed.

Now the "hue and cry" is that health care reform was not the issue President Obama and Congress should have tackled first (despite the fact that reigned in health care costs helps our economy)—but rather they should be turning away from health care reform and focusing on jobs. The focus was on jobs—first thing—with the stimulus package that bailed out banks and the out-of-balance budgets of the states and directed funds toward jobs in the states in health care, energy independence and education. But clearly, this hasn’t been enough.

Others and I have suggested Congress take unspent bailout money and use it for infrastructure jobs in our states. Infrastructure building is one of the most direct ways to get people working again quickly, especially skilled workers in the building trades, which is often called the "tip of the spear" to jobs recovery in any area. My friends in the IBEW and many others like them could use that help, and our communities would benefit from it.

Brunner gets it on infrastructure spending, and I have quoted this part before.  Sh also correctly asserts that the stimulus was primarily a jobs creation effort albeit one that was watered down with useless tax cuts.   Brunner goes on and talks about unemployment benefits.

In Ohio and many other places in the U.S. we need some common sense solutions—like letting people work part time when they can find it but not cutting off their unemployment benefits. Few states allow this, so why not pick up this regulation from the states for now and get people working again, even if only part time?

Most people on unemployment are receiving just a portion of what they were earning. They still have their mortgages to pay, prescriptions to pay for, cars to fuel and repair, and kids’ lunches to buy—so why not let them do it with reduced benefits? They would have longer to find a sustainable job for the same overall benefit cap while small businesses could safely begin to grow right now.

The wages they receive would most likely be substantially less anyway than their weekly benefit but if they could take the job, it could lead to a full-time position and they could still receive partial benefits while working without giving up their unemployment benefits completely.

The U.S. Department of Labor’s website is clear that unemployment insurance programs (created in 1935 in response to the Great Depression) play a key role in helping businesses, communities and the nation’s economy by providing temporary income support for laid off workers.

I do think after that little stunt that Jim Bunning pulled, we know that Republicans somehow think of unemployment as a disincentive to working rather than a means of support while families are looking for a new job.   I am thankful that Brunner gets it that we want people to be able to continue to pay their mortgage and the rest of their bills.

Allowing those laid off workers to start working part time, for instance for up to 6 months, would be a good start. The USDOL’s Trade Adjustment Assistance program that provides a variety of re-employment services and income support for jobs lost by increased imports or "shifts in production to foreign countries, due to trade and business tax policies" (better known as "outsourcing") sets a similar time frame.

I applaud some of the more long-term steps being proposed like:

  1.    Unfreezing the credit market for small businesses and manufacturers,
  1. Helping small and mid-sized manufacturers (especially former auto suppliers and auto component manufacturers – Ohio’s largest industry) retool for the clean energy economy,
  1.    Fostering entrepreneurialism and the creation of new jobs through business incubators like I’ve seen in Beachwood, Ohio,
  1. Preparing our workforce for new jobs through tailored, regional workforce development programs to support high-growth industries, and
  1.    Enforcing trade laws to invest in domestic manufacturing and production, like Senator Sherrod Brown’s Trade Enforcement Priorities Act, to give the federal government more authority to address trade barriers and require the U.S. Trade Representative (Ohio Republican Senate candidate Rob Portman’s former job in the Bush administration) to analyze trade barriers that have the most adverse effect on U.S. exports and employment to crack down on the unfair practices that have killed American jobs and drained our country of our sources of prosperity.

All of those are good ideas, especially retooling for a clean energy economy, which echoes what many progressives call for and looking at the worst trade practices that are killing off American jobs.   She also has a full section under Issues regarding Trade, but you get the idea with Brunner.  She's through and solutions-oriented.

Next, we look at Lieutenant Governor Lee Fisher and his take on Jobs.  Fisher has a brief page on Jobs.  Below is his opening statement:

My top priority is economic recovery for Ohio and the nation, and that means a relentless focus on saving and creating good-paying jobs. When I was asked by Ted Strickland to run as his Lieutenant Governor in 2006, Ohio was just beginning to feel the effects of the Bush Administration’s misguided trade policies, failed economic program, and disastrous fiscal stewardship that ran up our national debt. Never in our lifetime have we seen such a catastrophic national economy.

I support common-sense economic principles: fiscal discipline, living within our means, rewarding hard work, investing in our people, and growing a strong middle class. In the Senate, I will fight to reduce the deficit and support pay-as-you-go budget rules to make sure Congress lives within its means. I also will fight to implement tax policies that reward work, support middle-class families, and encourage investment and job creation.

Despite these tough times, I continue to believe in the innovative, entrepreneurial spirit of America and the power of economic growth and fair competition to create shared prosperity. With the right policies in place, I am confident we can create good jobs and grow our economy in a way that benefits all Ohioans.

Let's see:  somehow reducing the deficit creates jobs?   It will help our bond rating, that's for sure.   Cutting spending and letting infrastructure go certainly won't create jobs.   He says strong middle class, well...that's good.   How do you intend to keep the Middle class strong?   The page then mentions Fisher as Director of Development but then fails to mention that Fisher quit the position just a month after President Obama took office when Ohio was still hemorrhaging jobs.  That's Leadership for you.   And people wonder why Fisher won't debate Brunner.   That has to be a big reason why.

Lee believes we can and must make Ohio a hub of energy production, putting thousands of Ohioans to work creating sources of clean, renewable energy like wind turbines, solar panels and fuel cell-powered cars.

I somehow take it that Fisher would find the funding for this, and also minimie the bureaucracy when it comes to installing solar panels on one's roof as well?   I think the focus on fuel cells for cars is unrealistic right now.  Biodiesel is much more inplementable right now, not to mention that I know switchgrass ethanol is being worked on.    The page then lacks to mention anything about trade or infrastructure.    Fisher then mentions health care reform passing and then educational attainment and job training.  He talks about trade but then doesn't give any specifics on his trade policies.  And on energy, he doesn't mention nuclear at all, and then mentions "clean coal". Yeah, "clean coal" is like "jumbo shrimp", it's an oxymoron.

I saw in a post not too long ago that there were two other nobodies that popped into the Democratic race at the last moment.  There's no mention of them on OpenCongress, and so I won't bother with them.  If someone can even name these nobodies on the ballot, then I'll consider updating with their positions if they have a website.

Lastly, we have Rob Portman, the Republican.  Portman currently polls ahead of either Brunner or Fisher, but it is only March and his lead isn't that much.   On Portman's Issue page, Jobs is on the top.  His Jobs tab talks about him visiting manufacturing plants and small business.  Then he tells a whopper:

But Crown Battery’s management – like many other small business owners – are fearful of the health proposals currently being debated in Washington that could raise small business taxes and force workers into government-run plans that do less and cost more.

The current Jobs Bills being passed and debated in Congress actually cut taxes for most small businesses.   The 15 Billion dollar Jobs Bill was mostly tax cuts. So that's lie #1.   The only plans that people are being forced into are the ones run by Wellpoint, Aetna, the Blue Crosses and all the other health insurers.  So unless Uncle Sam is the one really running Wellpoint, that is a blatant lie.  Furthermore, there is no government-run plan in the current Senate Bill or in the President's proposal.  He could somehow be saying that 65 year olds or older shouldn't be on Medicare though.   So is that it, Mr. Portman?  You think seniors shouldn't be on Medicare?   He then goes on to concern troll the Employee Free Choice Act, extols nuclear as an alternative fuel source(but silence about all others) and says cap-and-trade(and he calls it a "tax') would kill jobs.  He then goes on further about job training and faith-based charities to help the less fortunate.

So there you have it.  Brunner, Fisher or Portman.   I think the choice is clear as to who is the best candidate on jobs, and that is Jennifer Brunner.

Cross-posted to The Progressive Electorate and Peanut Butter PAC

Originally posted to pistolSO on Wed Mar 10, 2010 at 03:12 PM PST.


Who do you want as Ohio's next Senator?

65%23 votes
17%6 votes
8%3 votes
5%2 votes
2%1 votes
0%0 votes

| 35 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

    •  Great work dissecting the different stances here (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      TomP, pistolSO

      Tipped and Rec'd

      FULL DISCLOSURE - I'm a paid employee of PeanutButterPAC, a progressive, Kossack founded PAC.

      by MinistryOfTruth on Wed Mar 10, 2010 at 03:20:28 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Hi PistolSO (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      James Allen, pistolSO

      Could I just say that I think either Brunner or Fisher has good ideas about job creation?

      But that won't be their problem once they get past the primary. Well, that won't be the problem LEE will face if he wins the primary (Jennifer will be fine). Lee's problem will be that he was in a position to actually implement some of these ideas as state director of development for two years, and a. Ohio continued to bleed jobs and b. then Lee quit to devote his fulltime to fundraising and campaign for the Senate.

      Lee dropped his big jobs plan with fanfare about two weeks ago, and it was all the stuff we've heard before — the solar panels and wind turbines, green jobs blah blah blah. In fact, our governor – who Lee bailed on – has been actively bringing a lot of this online.

      The ultimate issue IS trade. It's the issue that got Sherrod Brown into the Senate. It's the issue on which Rob Portman will repel voters — IF his Democratic opponent can get a foothold in attacking him on it. Jennifer can. I worry about Lee though. What will he say after Portman sneers that bailed on his job creation gig halfway through – AFTER losing Ohio tens of thousands of jobs? He'll be too busy defending himself and making excuses to mount an offense.

      Never should have quit, Lee.

      Stop Rob "The Job Outsourcer" Portman. Jennifer Brunner for Senate

      by anastasia p on Wed Mar 10, 2010 at 03:34:47 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Oh, about the "nobodies" (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      thethinveil, pistolSO

      One of them, Traci "TJ" Johnson, does have a website, which she finally updated. It won't do her any good though. Neither qualified for the ballot. Johnson is now threatening to sue Jennifer, claiming that as secretary of state, she engaged in partisan politics in keeping Johnson off the ballot. Johnson, however, apparently doesn't know that it's the county boards of election, not the SoS office, that actually validate the petitions. I understand virtually all of her signatures came from Franklin County so she'll have to talk to them. (I spoke with the Franklin BoE yesterday and confirmed this).

      Now I know some people are sticking with their theory that Lee Fisher put these women up to this. I have another theory. This lobbing completely baseless charges at the job Jennifer is doing as SoS has a familiar Republican ring to it. ACORN! ACORN! Doing this could be useful to the Republicans, no matter who wins the Democratic primary. If it's Jennifer, they have pre-smeared her. If it's Lee, they can blame it on him and demoralize Democrats some more.

      Stop Rob "The Job Outsourcer" Portman. Jennifer Brunner for Senate

      by anastasia p on Wed Mar 10, 2010 at 03:40:35 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Brunner's website is so good.... (4+ / 0-)

    Everyone should check it out.

    Founding Member of Peanut Butter PAC- A People-Powered PAC

    by pistolSO on Wed Mar 10, 2010 at 03:19:25 PM PST

  •  good post. Excellent point (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Predictor, thethinveil, pistolSO

    about deficits.

    The way I am beginning to see it is that Brunner is a good progressive candidate and that Fisher is a mediocre candidate.  

    Brunner is looking good to me.

  •  I've been reading up about Brunner a bit (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    thethinveil, pistolSO

    to see the job she did as Secretary of State.  State politics is often dirty business, and I was skeptical of her credibility at first, but she seems very honest.  She advocated for and did a lot to make ballot access more fair for minor parties and it seems like she's done a lot for election integrity while in office.  Just having someone who's aware of those issues in the Senate is worthwhile, not to mention how honest she seems to be.  I'm usually very skeptical of Democrats running at this high of a level, but she gets the thumbs up from me for now.

    •  Also (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      thethinveil, pistolSO

      if you're into election integrity, this interview by Brad Friedman is worth a read:

    •  In two years, she took a completely broken (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ybruti, rossl, pistolSO

      election system that left us with 4, 5, 6 and even 12 hours lines in 2004 because of the ineptitude (?) of J. Kenneth Blackwell, and assured that we did not see a repeat in 2008. She found a demoralized office more interested in evagelizing than in running smooth elections. She even found anti-abortion buttons in her state car!

      I worked feverishly to elect her in 2006 (her Republican opponent was the son of Dick Cheney's lawyer — imagine HIM running Ohio's 2008 elections!) and got to know her pretty well. She hasn't let me down with her work in office, and I think she'd be an outstanding senator. In 2008, the Republicans threw one spurious lawsuit after another at her, hoping to be able to disenfranchise a lot of urban, minority and lower-income people, and she beat back every one. She would be another Sherrod Brown.

      Stop Rob "The Job Outsourcer" Portman. Jennifer Brunner for Senate

      by anastasia p on Wed Mar 10, 2010 at 06:51:33 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Sorry I missed your story (0+ / 0-)
    thanks for being on our side. Will look for you more often.

    LeBron James is worth way more than any Wall Street Banker.

    by J Brunner Fan on Sat Mar 13, 2010 at 06:43:01 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site