The terminally choleric Andrew Breitbart (or Boogerman as he'd prefer to be known) is featuring a story on his BigGovernment web site that illustrates a disturbing affinity for child sexual abusers. And in pursuit of the rights of deviants everywhere, Breitbart sent out a lackey to ambush Rep. Alan Grayson.
Brought to you by...
News Corpse
The Internet's Chronicle Of Media Decay.
The article on BigGovernment is authored by Jason Mattera, who appears to be auditioning to be Bill O'Reilly's next ambush geek. If so, he has some pretty big clown shoes to fill: Stuttering Jesse Watters and Griff Teabaggin Jenkins. But Mattera is off to a good start with a video of him pestering Rep. Alan Grayson. The video is titled:
"Why would Alan Grayson want to give your money over to Native American child molesters?"
A better question would be why does Andrew Breitbart Support child molesters? In the video Mattera is shown slyly gaining Grayson's trust by talking about his Brooklyn upbringing. But it doesn't take long before he reveals his psycho side - and Grayson picks it up immediately asking, in an understatement, if Mattera is a kook. But Mattera presses on undaunted in his attempt to tie Grayson to a government program that Mattera says gives money to child molesters. The source for Mattera's allegation is this language in the recently passed health care bill that addresses...
"...perpetrators of child sexual abuse who are Indian or members of an Indian household."
That's all Mattera shows us. What he leaves out is that the bill does not give any money to abusers at all. It funds treatment programs to prevent future incidents of abuse. In the section of the bill immediately following the one Mattera cites it explicitly describes the use of funds, including:
(5) To identify and provide behavioral health treatment to Indian perpetrators and perpetrators who are members of an Indian household--
(A) making efforts to begin offender and behavioral health treatment while the perpetrator is incarcerated or at the earliest possible date if the perpetrator is not incarcerated;
(B) providing treatment after the perpetrator is released, until it is determined that the perpetrator is not a threat to children.
So apparently Mattera and Breitbart are opposed to protecting children from child molesters. They are openly advocating a position wherein criminal deviants would be permitted to maintain their perversions and pose a continuing threat to kids. Perhaps Breitbart and company don't want such treatment mandated because they might find themselves at risk of being obligated to participate in such treatment. I don't know, I'm just asking. But it is undeniable that Breitbart is more interested in the rights of child molesters than in the child victims.