This week I was treated to a very entertaining sight on my facebook. One of my wingnut FB friends actually argued opposite positions against the President. Her derangement actually led her to argue for something Republicans are staunchly against, just because it criticized the President.
Follow me to see what happened...
First, came this article by the ever nutty Charles Krauthammer. It's full of the usual right wing talking points about the new Nuclear Posture--"appeasement", "weakness", take your pick. Naturally I counter with the actual words of both the treaty and the Posture document. While doing so, I imply Mr Krauthammer has a bit of difficulty with that concept called reading. Naturally my wingnut friend says I don't know what I'm talking about and projecting, while Chuckie is highly intelligent and knows all. Fair enough.
Then yesterday, she posts THIS article about Iran wanting to lodge a complaint against the new posture. This is what she wrote about it:
Glad someone else is complaining besides Americans...
I wrote the following in reply:
Boo frickin hoo. I never thought you'd be SUPPORTING Iran. Does that make you a terrorist sympathizer? And how does Iran complaining of a threat dovetail with people like Krauthammer in your earlier link saying that the US is "appeasing" Iran?
To this time, there has been nothing but crickets. Has their Obama Derangement gone so far as to side with IRAN?