Skip to main content

Warren Buffet gave a prophetic pronouncement back in 2003 about the Derivatives market, seeing the exponential dangers of this "paper-thin" type of investment.

Buffet did not mince words. He called them "financial weapons of mass destruction":

Buffett warns on investment 'time bomb'
BBC - 4 March, 2003

The derivatives market has exploded in recent years, with investment banks selling billions of dollars worth of these investments to clients as a way to off-load or manage market risk.

But Mr Buffett argues that such highly complex financial instruments are time bombs and "financial weapons of mass destruction" that could harm not only their buyers and sellers, but the whole economic system.

Some derivatives contracts, Mr Buffett says, appear to have been devised by "madmen".  [...]

Warren Buffet, the billionaire, renown for common-sense Investing, continues with his dire warnings on Derivatives ...

Contracts devised by 'madmen'

Derivatives are financial instruments that allow investors to speculate on the future price of, for example, commodities or shares - without buying the underlying investment.
Some derivatives contracts, Mr Buffett says, appear to have been devised by "madmen".

He warns that derivatives can push companies onto a "spiral that can lead to a corporate meltdown",
Derivatives also pose a dangerous incentive for false accounting, Mr Buffett says.

The profits and losses from derivatives deals are booked straight away, even though no actual money changes hand. In many cases the real costs hit companies only many years later.

SO why are these Derivative Bets, SO Dangerous?

What's so wrong with a little "back-room trading" of "Profit and Loss Bookkeeping Risk" among Friends Thieves?

Derivatives: Buffet calls them financial Weapons of Mass Destruction
By John Riley, Chief Strategist -- 01/18/08

What are Derivatives?

Derivatives are private contracts (bets) between financial institutions. They can be on the direction of commodities, the stock markets or currencies, but the banks’ favorites are interest rates. (You can go to the Comptroller of the Currency website to get their quarterly reports and see for yourself what Wall Street hopes you never see.)
The scariest part of derivatives is their leverage. Like exchange traded options, derivative contracts can control assets for only a fraction of the contract value. The banks take the leverage to an extreme and have very little in assets backing up their derivative portfolios. According to the Comptroller, the top 25 banks have assets that only amount to about 6% of the Notional Value of their derivatives.
Derivatives have barely any regulation on them. For years, Congress tried and Greenspan stood in the way. Banks barely mention them in the annual reports except for a footnote.

Thanks to the lack of regulation, derivatives have grown dramatically. There has been a 473% increase in the Notional Value of derivatives at the top 25 banks since 1999.

Amazing, as of the beginning of 2008, the Top 25 banks ONLY HAD 6% Collateral to back up all their over-leveraged Derivative BETS! That includes all those notorious Credit Default Swaps too, tucked in among those Credit Derivatives. The Bankers put only 6% Down, to back up their betting!

In the old days, before Deregulation, trading betting "on margin", required minimum levels of capital assets (20-30%) on hand to back up, Margin Trading (ie "leveraging shares" you don't Pay for). But with Deregulation, and the convenience of Derivative Paper contracts, those quaint "Captial Asset" requirements went out the window.

Say, you got $1000 Dollars, BUT you want to bet $40,000 -- No Problem! How about $50,000?  How about $100,000?  Step right up, as long as you have the prestige of an Investment Bank, or a Billion Dollar Hedge Fund, to back you up ... "take a seat at the Table" -- ante up with your 1K Chip -- We'll "spot you" the rest!

NOooo Problem!

The sheer speculative arrogance of the Top Wall Street Bankers is truly astronomical when you chart it out. The Comptroller of the Currency (pdf), of US Dept of Treasury, has been busy collecting the data, if anyone cares to take the time to chart it out, like I have. (By the way a Trillion, is an awful big number -- It's a Million, Millions!)

Their lack of Caution about the extreme Risks they were taking, should cause any Regulator, to sound an Alarm ... [or cause any Congress-person to want to pass Strong Financial Reform ...]

The Top 5 Banks -- March 2008

The 6th-10th Over-leveraged Banks -- March 2008

The 11th-15th sort-of-leveraged Banks -- March 2008

The Top 5 Banks vs ALL the Rest of the Banks -- March 2008

The Top 5 Banks cornering 96.9% of the Derivatives -- March 2008

The NEW Top 5 Banks -- June 2009

Data source: Comptroller of the Currency (pdf), of US Dept of Treasury, has issued an updated report as of June 2009.

Too bad, most of the Wall Street Regulators, of the LAST Decade, were happy let the Casino continue ...  they let it all ride.  

They bet on the House.

And when the House didn't have the funds to pay out on all those "Markers" ... when the Market Risk finally turned against them?

OOOP's !!!

Say America, could you "spot us" a few TRILLION Dollars, pretty please ???

Trust us ... We're Good for it!

Really ... just let us get back in "the Game" ...
Those Derivatives Bets will go our way, this Next time, you'll see.

We know HOW to Manage Risk! ... you simply Trade it away, to someone else!

Problem solved!

Risks-be-gone, has come through again. ... There's NOTHING left to worry about, SEE. On Paper -- Everything's hunky dory ...

Warren, really ought to get a clue!

Originally posted to Digging up those Facts ... for over 8 years. on Sun Apr 25, 2010 at 09:02 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site