Skip to main content

Outraged over Arizona’s new law that will inevitably lead to racial profiling and civil rights issues, the Washington D.C. City Council has introduced two bold bills that counter Arizona’s SB1070, both of which have been met with unanimous approval from Council members.

From the Restore Fairness blog.
Outraged over Arizona’s new law that will inevitably lead to racial profiling and civil rights issues, the Washington D.C. City Council has introduced two bold bills that counter Arizona’s SB1070, both of which have been met with unanimous approval from Council members.

In the first one, the Council sponsored a (non-binding) bill that encourages all businesses in the state to boycott Arizona by cutting off business with it as long as the harsh legislation continues to be implemented. The bill introduced by Councilman Michael A. Brown also calls on the D.C. government to divest themselves of any Municipal bonds issues by Arizona and to not participate in any conferences held in the state. The move to boycott the state of Arizona is not unique to D.C. but has been carried out by many other City Councils including those of Hollywood, San Diego, San Francisco, Oakland and Boston. The City Council’s of New York and Los Angeles are considering similar measures against Arizona to protest the bill that has caused so much controversy in the past few weeks.

The second bill, introduced in Washington D.C. by Council members Phil Mendelson and Jim Graham is called the "Secure Communities Bill of 2010″ and is a much more aggressive measure aimed at the federal government’s Secure Communities program. This bill, also unanimously supported by the Council, is groundbreaking as it prohibits D.C. Metropolitan police from sharing information with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Secure Communities Program. The Secure Communities program enlists local law enforcement to collaborate with immigration authorities by providing them with all identity and fingerprint information pertaining to anyone that is arrested by the local police. Washington D.C. became a part of the Secure Communities Program last November, but now police won’t be allowed to co-operate with ICE. In a statement made yesterday, Council member Mendelson, the bill’s main author said-

Contrary to its name, the Secure Communities program makes the public less safe by creating fear and mistrust of the police and undermining community policing...I’m proud that so many of my colleagues are joining me in introducing this bill to offer a strong counter-statement to the one recently made in Arizona.

Stressing that immigration enforcement was a federal issue, Phil Mendelson expressed his reservations for the Secure Communities program, saying that it often led to racial profiling by allowing police to conduct an immigration check on person even before they had been found guilty of a crime.

The "Uncover the Truth" campaign brings to light the ways in which collaborations between federal immigration and local police, carried out through the 287(g) and Secure Communities programs have become notorious for racial profiling and misuse by local police, in addition to providing precedents for legislation like that recently introduced in Arizona. Led by the The National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON), the campaign gets local groups to question collaborations between immigration and local police and hold lawmakers accountable through press conferences, community forums, reports, vigils and discussions. Speaking about the legislation introduced in the D.C. Council, Sarahi Uribe of NDLON hoped that other City Councils would follow suit and blamed Secure Communities for the "disaster in Arizona."

Not to be left far behind in the battle against inhumane and unjust immigration policy, New York City Governor David A. Paterson announced that he was considering setting up a "Special Immigration Board of Pardons" to review cases of New York immigrants who are facing deportation based on minor criminal convictions. In this path-breaking move, Gov. Paterson has said that the board will consider the cases on an individual basis, distinguishing major offenses from major convictions. Gov. Paterson said that he was motivated to rectify a system that was "embarrassingly and wrongly inflexible" in deporting people without discretion or consideration of their families and specific circumstances. At present there are only a few such cases pending, but once the panel is set up, they are expecting hundreds of petitions for pardon.

Inspired by the case of Qing Hong Wu, a 29-year-old man, who despite living in the U.S. since age five, faced deportation to China because of a minor infraction he committed when he was a teenager, Gov. Paterson decided to do his bit to restore fairness into immigration policy in New York. Speaking on Monday at the Court of Appeals he said-

To be sure, there are some individuals whose crimes are egregious or who pose a threat to public safety. And they are justly removed from the United States. But there are others for whom the situation is far less clear. For them, our national immigration laws leave no room to consider mitigating circumstances. But in New York, we believe in rehabilitation. And we believe in renewal. And we believe in second chances.

Attributing Gov. Paterson’s timing to a general critique of harsh immigration laws and even harsher enforcement, a New York Times editorial compares it to Arizona’s new law-

Mr. Paterson has shown courage and common sense at a time when the national debate about immigration shows little of either. His move was unconnected to the radicalism in Arizona, which just passed a law making criminals of every undocumented person within its borders, and greatly empowering the police to arrest people they suspect are here illegally. But it inevitably calls to mind the bad example of Arizona.

It is heartening to know that lawmakers and leaders in different parts of the country are engaging in the pressing issue of immigration, and making use of their authority to take a stand against laws like Arizona’s SB1070 that attack the fundamental rights and dignity of residents of this country. We only hope that continued pressure will put an end to the law, so that the people of Arizona can go about their daily lives without constant fear of being harassed.

Learn. Share. Act. Go to restorefairness.org

Originally posted to Lets Breakthrough on Wed May 05, 2010 at 02:41 PM PDT.

Poll

Do you support Gov. Paterson's "Special Immigration Board of Pardons?"

79%31 votes
20%8 votes

| 39 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (8+ / 0-)

    Take action to fix a broken immigration system. www.restorefairness.org

    by Lets Breakthrough on Wed May 05, 2010 at 02:41:58 PM PDT

  •  Heck yes (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SarahLee, Nightprowlkitty

    I like living in my county, and while it's progressive compared to the rest of Georgia, I'm not sure if it could pass a similar anti-SB1070 measure.  Perhaps I should get in touch with my commissioner and let him know that I'm at least interested in having this be placed on the agenda.

    For D.C., N.Y., and the rest of the jurisdictions you write about, good for them.  May the rest of our bluer-tinged locales follow suit with similar measures.

    Enforce the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights daily.

    by Lothar2009 on Wed May 05, 2010 at 02:53:45 PM PDT

  •  did the same happen over prop 187 or prop 8? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MKSinSA

    If not, especially considering both of those were passed by a voter referendum, ie the will of the people, not as in our case the will of a few out of touch legislators, then this is just more hypocrisy in action.

    I've seen a lot of it in the last few weeks.......

  •  Ahem. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Bhishma

    I know it's tempting to think that New York City is the only thing between me and Buffalo, but there is a whole state attached to the city. And Paterson is governor of it all, not just NYC.

    •  Indeed. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Indexer

      A whole region that did NOT vote for him (neither did NYC), and where at least this person, myself, does NOT plan to vote for him.

      Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Paterson should not be anybody's role model for what a Governor should be.

  •  There might be constitutional issues (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ParkRanger

    But these measures are a nice gesture, even if their effects end up being limited.

  •  New Mexico Elections may be about immigration (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SarahLee

    There are two Republican candidates for the June 1 primary (there is a Republican and a Democratic primary that day) that are running a lot of TV.

    Susanna Martinez is a prosecutor who is Hispanic and whose ads have her standing on the border proclaiming a "get tough on illegal immigration" line.
    She is particularly emphasizing that she wants to repeal Bill Richardson's allowing undocumented people to have drivers' licenses.  

    It remains to be seen how this will play out, but the Democrats who oppose the Az law may be put on the defensive by this situation.

    Hopefully the fact that New Mexico has had a comfortably Hispanic and Indian culture going back to the 1600s (it became a state only in the early 20th century) will assure that the Democrats prevail and can keep a more liberal line on the issue.  

    However, the other candidate, Allen Weh, is a white haired Vietnam vet who seems to be appealing to the angry white vote.  I guess we'll see to what extent this affects the ultimate outcome in the fall.  

    States can't move as fast as cities.  For one thing, legislatures are not alwyas in session.  For another thing, the outcome of a pending election may have to be taken into account.  

    hope that the idiots who have no constructive and creative solutions but only look to tear down will not win the day.

    by Stuart Heady on Wed May 05, 2010 at 04:13:58 PM PDT

  •  Happening in Beantown too. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SarahLee

    The city council unanimously voted to boycot Arizona and Menino has come out in support of the measure. Not sure what meaningful business Boston has with Arizona businesses, but it's a good step.

    "You know Danny, I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chambers. Didn't want to do it, felt I owed it to them" -Judge Smails

    by RozzieJohnny on Wed May 05, 2010 at 05:53:42 PM PDT

  •  Robert Rodriguez (0+ / 0-)

    the director has a comment about Arizona with a trailer.

    MACHETE has some Cinco De Mayo words for you!!!

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site