Skip to main content

Never let bad policy get in the way of good politics.  That's the cynical motto of the growing class of political copycats bent on replicating Arizona's controversial new immigration law in other states, including California.

     Arizona's law, SB 1070, requires local police to act as federal immigration agents.  Now police officers in Arizona can detain someone if there is a "reasonable suspicion" that she's an illegal immigrant.  

     Despite a broad, national backlash, the urge to score political points on the fringe seems irresistible.  Last week, a California Assembly candidate promised to introduce an Arizona-style immigration law if he's elected.  And in ten more states--Georgia, Oklahoma, Colorado, Utah, Ohio, Missouri, South Carolina, Mississippi, Texas, and Maryland--politicians looking for a boost have called for laws that would mirror Arizona's law.

     California cannot afford an Arizona-style immigration law.  It is bad policy and the worst kind of politics.   (More in the extended entry.)

Protecting public safety was supposedly a main justification for Arizona's law.  As a career prosecutor for nearly two decades, I can tell you that transforming our local police officers into immigration agents will seriously harm our crime-fighting efforts.  We have the nation's largest population of immigrants, with nearly 10 million California residents born abroad.  If they don't report crimes, for fear of being interrogated about their immigration status, crimes will go unsolved and criminals will walk free among us.  I've personally prosecuted hundreds of serious and violent crimes--robberies, murders, and rapes--where the case depended on an immigrant who was scared to come forward, but, because they did, we got a conviction.  

We need to encourage, not discourage, people to report violent crimes.  In every community, there are predators who literally stalk immigrants precisely because they count on them to "keep quiet" if they're victimized.  In domestic violence cases, abusers routinely threaten their spouses that they'll "turn them over to immigration" if they report the abuse.  Other criminals rob their neighbors, scam people out of their homes, and sexually abuse children, counting on the fear of police to keep victims from reporting the crimes.  Turning police officers into immigration agents will only push them further into the shadows and make them reliably easy victims for criminals.  

     But, of course, the predators don't stop there.  The same people who victimize immigrants quickly turn their attention to other victims, as well -- citizens, bystanders, and others.  Ultimately, then, it is our community that wins when people report crime, and ours that loses when they don't.  

     We also can't afford to divert scarce local law enforcement resources to enforcing federal immigration laws. Law enforcement budgets have been cut to the bone across California; many cities are laying-off police officers, firefighters, and prosecutors.  We need to focus every resource on fighting violent crimes.  We don't have extra officers--or local tax dollars--available to moonlight as immigration patrol, which is a federal responsibility.  

     There's no doubt that the federal government needs to pass meaningful immigration reform and that we have a serious illegal immigration problem in California, but "politics now, think later" measures like SB 1070 aren't the solution.    

Kamala Harris is the District Attorney of San Francisco, and a candidate for Attorney General of the California.  For more information, see kamalaharris.org.

Originally posted to Kamala Harris on Fri May 07, 2010 at 12:26 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site