I used to, back when my brain was more sharp, do these diaries a lot more often. Unfortuantly I've not been able to do them as often. However I found a Morality Play that I think some people here might find interesting and offer if up for people to take and then, if enough people find it of interest, to comment on in the comments section below.
More after the break
You are given, in the play, different scenarios, and are offered choices, usually two or three (yes or no) or degree type choices. At the end you are given a review of your answers.
Of course this test is not perfect, I've yet to find one that is. It is interesting, though, if for no other reason than to provide a way to start an interesting discussion.
I've included my results below not because they were good, nor bad (As I do not believe anyone's results can be good/bad) but as a way to show what the results look like if you're interested in doing the 'play' and I also am curious to see how different I am here compared to others.
Anyways, here are "My results"
-------------------------------------------------------------
Your Moral Parsimony Score is 59%
How To Interpret Your Score
The higher your percentage score the more parsimonious your moral framework. In other words, a high score is suggestive of a moral framework that comprises a minimal number of moral principles that apply across a range of circumstances and acts. What is a high score? As a rule of thumb, any score above 75% should be considered indicative of a parsimonious moral framework. However, perhaps a better way to think about this is to see how your score compares to other people's scores. In this respect, your score of 59% is slightly lower than the average score of 67%. This suggests that you have utilised a somewhat wider range of moral principles than average in order to make judgements about the scenarios presented in this test, and that you have, at least on occasion, judged aspects of the acts and circumstances depicted here to be morally relevant that other people consider to be morally irrelevant.
Geographical Distance
Your score of 51% is significantly lower than the average score of 73% in this category.
This suggests that geographical distance is a relevant factor in your moral thinking. Usually, this will mean feeling a greater moral obligation towards people located nearby than towards those who are far away. To incorporate geographical distance within your moral framework as a morally relevant factor is to decrease its parsimoniousness
Family Relatedness
Your score of 35% is a lot lower than the average score of 58% in this category.
It seems then that family relatedness is an important factor in your moral thinking. Normally, this will mean feeling a greater moral obligation towards people who are related to you than towards those who are not
Acts and Omissions
Your score of 51% is a little lower than the average score of 60% in this category.
This suggests that the distinction between acting and omitting to act is sometimes a relevant factor in your moral thinking. Probably, you tend to believe that those who act have a greater moral culpability than those who simply omit to act.
Scale
This category has to do with whether scale is a factor in making moral judgements. A simple example will make this clear. Consider a situation where it is possible to save ten lives by sacrificing one life. Is there a moral difference between this choice and one where the numbers of lives involved are different but proportional - for example, saving 100 lives by sacrificing ten? In this category then, the idea is to determine whether moral principles are applied without modification or qualification when you're dealing with sets of circumstances that differ only in their scale, as in the sense described above.
Your score of 100% is significantly higher than the average score of 75% in this category.
It seems that scale, as it is described above, is not an important consideration in your moral worldview.