Skip to main content

Yes, this is the title of the most insidiously stupid opinion piece yet written on the BP induced catastrophe.

This is what the UK's conservatives are saying now, courtesy of their mouthpiece newspaper The Daily Telegraph.

You really have to read it to believe it. Here is Nile Gardiner

Could the Obama administration’s bashing of BP (or British Petroleum) over the Gulf oil spill harm relations between the White House and the new Cameron administration? I think there is a good chance it could. After all, a major British corporation, which employs 29,000 Americans, has been demonised by this administration with language that it would dare not use even against America’s worst enemies, such as Iran and North Korea. In addition, it is facing xenophobic calls from some Democrats on Capitol Hill to be banned altogether from operating in the United States, a petty form of protectionism which is fundamentally against the spirit of free trade which for centuries has helped drive the prosperity of both the United States and Great Britain.

Let me tell you something Mr. Gardiner, BP has faced calls for its banishment from the US not because of xenophobia but because it is at fault for the largest oil spill in US history. They ignored safety requirements--that would be too generous, they WROTE the safety requirements, ignored warning signs per the 60 minutes revelations, are responsible for the death of 11 people as a result, got caught trying to bribe those affected with an insulting $5,000 payout, and now continually lies and tries to dodge responsibility.

That is why President Obama and the US government are "bashing" BP.

Some of the language that has been used by the Obama team in the wake of the Gulf spill has been unusually vindictive against a major foreign company, not least one that is a leading business flagship of America’s closest friend and ally...BP may not be flavour of the month at the moment, with good reason, but it remains the UK’s biggest company, paying £2 billion into the Treasury’s coffers in 2009. It is one of Britain’s best known brands, and its own fortunes have a significant impact not only on the British and world economies, but also upon the US economy as well.

I think it is instructive that his whole argument rests really on pride--not once does Mr. Gardiner mention the damage that BP has done to the United States, it is all about what he essentially claims to be Britain's bruised ego because of the "face" of British business is under attack. Let me tell you something Mr. Gardiner, I think I speak for most Americans in saying that we do not give a shit about what you or anyone in the UK government feels about your best known brand being bashed for causing this calamity. If BP wanted to protect its image around the world, then maybe they should have behaved responsibly in their business practices. I simply say to you, too fucking bad.

The "boot on the throat" remark however, was beyond the pale, and symbolic of an arrogant, imperial-style presidency with a track record of disdain for US allies, as well as the private sector in general.

What do you know, British conservatives have bought into the Tea Party! You would think that their proximity to real socialism in the continent would teach them a thing or two about Obama's government, and how it is anything but. Obama should keep his word on keeping their boot on the throat of BP. And the government should keep bashing the evil BP until they pay what they owe.

Yet I wonder what this fool would say if an American petrochemical corporation, like say ExxonMobil did the same thing off the coast of the UK. I really wonder if Mr. Gardiner would be calling on his brand new Prime Minister to shut up about America's largest company. Why do I have a feeling he would not...

Originally posted to michael1104 on Thu May 20, 2010 at 10:40 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site