Skip to main content

As has been noted, our Democratic Party often resembles a coalition of disparate groups, each working alone on its individual agenda and strategies.  Whether they represent unions, environmentalists or whatever, even when their initiatives enjoy broad popular support, each group too often loses the battle to get legislators to vote for their bills FOR THE EXACT SAME REASON.  Our Democratic and Republican members of Congress are pressured by a deeply flawed and unfair system to reject what is popular and in the best interest of the Country in favor of what will ensure their re-election; namely raising enough campaign funds and avoiding becoming the target of rich and powerful special interests.

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Citizens United v. FEC has made the above named problem a thousand times worse.  

Doug Kendall, writing for Huffington Post, succinctly describes the danger this legislation poses;

To see the significance of this, consider that in his historic run to the presidency, Barack Obama broke every political fundraising record, raising nearly $750 million from more than a million contributors in 2007 and 2008. This sounds impressive until you consider that during 2008 alone, ExxonMobil Corporation generated profits of $45 billion. With a diversion of even 2 percent of these profits to the political process, Exxon could have far outspent the Obama campaign and fundamentally changed the dynamic of the 2008 election, perhaps even the result.

But by so strongly and treasonously siding with corporations at the expense of individual Americans on who gets to govern our democracy, that Supreme Court ruling has forced our hand in addressing a "money in politics" problem that we should have attacked long ago.  According to  this articlein The Hill, our Democratic Congress will work to pass legislation that overturns Citizens United v. FEC by July 4th, so that major corporations cannot commandeer our upcoming election this fall.

A powerful result of the 2008 global recession is that both Progressive and Conservative voters are now enraged with the rich banks and other corporations whose greed, selfishness, and recklessness have cost so many so much.  This rare dynamic provides us the VERY RARE opportunity to go BEYOND nullifying Citizens United v. FEC, and ultimately pass much stronger campaign finance and lobbying reform.

But our Democratic interest groups can only take advantage of this huge opportunity if they are smart enough to agree to work together on this goal.  Each group should agree to devote at least ten percent of their time and resources to fighting the battle to get big money out of politics.  To fight climate change, or for a more fair economy, or for better health care, without also fighting campaign finance and lobbying laws is a recipe for failure.   In other words, we can continue fighting, and mostly losing, a thousand individual battles, or we can come together to wage full-scale war to get big money out of politics, and begin to win those individual battles much more easily and at far less cost.  

Democratic groups must band together to wage full-scale war to pass campaign finance and lobbying reform now when this very rare opportunity  has opened.  Our Democratic groups can no longer afford to go it along, fighting and losing battle after battle because our members of Congress are, by necessity, more beholden to the interests who pay for, or can prevent, their re-election than by the American public.

This diary is a call for organized, intelligent action by our Democratic groups.  The time has never been more ripe for doing this, and the window of opportunity will not last forever.  Let’s seize the day on, and come together to ensure that when Congress acts next month to reverse Citizens United v. FEC, the campaign will serve as a platform for getting our Democratic groups and the voting public aware of how important campaign finance and lobbying reform is to passing strong and effective popular legislation regardless of what that legislation is.  We need to jump on the upcoming battle to nullify Citizens United v. FEC, and then swiftly move on to enacting stronger legislation as if all of the other issues we fight for depend on it.  In a very real sense, they do.

Originally posted to Georgeo57 on Wed May 26, 2010 at 07:01 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Middlelines

    Read Teixeira's 2009 report, and see why the GOP is almost dead.

    by Georgeo57 on Wed May 26, 2010 at 07:01:32 PM PDT

  •  Are they going to reverse Citizens United? (0+ / 0-)

    I haven't kept pace with this issue. That's great news.

    It will go a long way towards solving The Main Problem.

    •  They can't. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      VClib
      It would take an amendment partially repealing the first amendment to overturn the decision.
      •  They could craft a provision (0+ / 0-)

        that major corporations and unions must have their campaign contributions approved by a vote of their employees/members, who must be given sufficient advance notice on the amount of each contribution, and on the organizations' primary reasons for supporting one candidate over another. That should effectively nullify the SCOTUS ruling.

        Read Teixeira's 2009 report, and see why the GOP is almost dead.

        by Georgeo57 on Wed May 26, 2010 at 07:57:58 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Georgeo - the Dems are being careful (0+ / 0-)

          If Congress passes something that has the effect of nullifying CU its likely the DC Court of Appeals will stay the legislation. I think the Dems will do something that moderates CU but you won't see something bold, because it may not pass legal muster. The central theme of CU was that Congress has very limited legislative authority in this area.

          "let's talk about that"

          by VClib on Wed May 26, 2010 at 09:34:45 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Good point; I agree. (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            VClib

            My guess is that the legislation is a smaller part of the overall strategy to convince voters that any candidate who has ads run and paid for by major corporations will not represent them in Congress.

            Read Teixeira's 2009 report, and see why the GOP is almost dead.

            by Georgeo57 on Thu May 27, 2010 at 07:38:05 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

    •  They will draft legislation nebulous enough (0+ / 0-)

      to discourage corporations from getting into the November election.

      My guess is that Obama and his ad visors have not been very vocal on the ruling so as to not attract major coverage too soon before the election.  A larger part of their strategy may be to pass a bill before July 4th, but then ride the issue harder into the fall.  They will hopefully be able to pass the disclosure provisions that could then be the foundation of a strategy to turn voters against any candidate with strong corporate support

      Read Teixeira's 2009 report, and see why the GOP is almost dead.

      by Georgeo57 on Wed May 26, 2010 at 07:55:44 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site