Skip to main content

An estimated 900,000 additional job cuts will be added to the 15 million unemployed workers that are already idled.  With the Senate's failure to break a Republican filibuster on the HR 4213, commonly called the Tax Extenders Bill, which included re-authorization of extended unemployment benefits, states have begun to plan for layoffs, massive layoffs.

46 states are projected to run budget shortfalls for the coming fiscal year[1] and without the additional funding from the federal government, they will have no choice but to trim the state workforce:

State budget woes are a worsening drag on growth as the federal government tries to wean the economy from two years of extraordinary support. By Jan. 1, funds from the $787 billion federal stimulus bill will dry up. That money from Washington has helped cushion state budgets as tax revenue has plunged.

State leaders won’t be able to ride out this cycle the way they have in the past. The budget holes are too large. For the first time since 1962, sales and income tax revenue fell for five straight quarters, through December 2009, according to the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government at the State University of New York at Albany.[2]

In Pennsylvania, which is confronting a $1.6 billion revenue shortfall,  the elimination of the additional Medicaid financing would mean having  to come up with  $850 million, Mr. Rendell said.

Because the state has already made more than $2.5 billion in cuts since  the fall of 2008, when the economy went into a freefall, Mr. Rendell  said layoffs were inevitable, not just at the state level but the local  level.

"It’s going to be huge teacher layoffs, money to our universities, money  to the counties and cities, municipal workers, firemen," he said. "It  would be enormously destructive."[4]

Another critical provision of HR 4213 was additional funding for state Medicaid programs.  States had already included those funds in their upcoming budgets, without that funding states will have a large hole in their budgets for the coming fiscal year:

A total of 30 states had already factored the additional Medicaid money  into their budgets, according to the National  Conference of State Legislatures. Only nine states have come up  with contingency plans. Most states begin their fiscal years on July 1.

The additional federal aid for Medicaid was initially supposed to be $24  billion but was later scaled back to $16 billion in the bill that  stalled on Thursday.

Making the situation more difficult for states, the recent passage of  the federal health care overhaul bars them from rolling back eligibility  on Medicaid, so the cuts would have to come from elsewhere in their  budgets — and would likely include layoffs from different parts of the  state governments, many of which have already seen big cuts — or by  slashing things like payments to Medicaid providers.

"If they don’t fund this, it’s an unfunded mandate on the states," said  Gov. Jennifer  M. Granholm of Michigan.

Making up for the missing federal aid would add another half billion  dollars to Michigan’s existing $1.5 billion budget shortfall, Ms.  Granholm said on a conference call with reporters Friday.

Adding an additional 900,000 to the already swollen unemployment lines could stall a sputtering recovery in the near term and possibly plunge the whole nation into a full blown depression.

Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) suggested that Republican stalling could have political motives and that they are playing a dangerous game of chicken with the live of millions of Americans already battered by the worst economy in generations:

"We don’t have even one Republican willing to help us break this  filibuster," she said. "We have every anticipation that we will not have  the votes. It’s become very clear that the Republicans in the  Senate want this bill to fail.

"It's a cynical move, because it doesn’t serve them in terms of their  elections this fall. They have decided they want this economy  to fail, and they’re willing to take the country down with them," she said in an emotional conference call.

What’s the price of this political obstructionism? In  addition to the millions of Americans who stand to lose unemployment  benefits, a huge number of private and public sector employees will lose  their jobs due to state budget cuts. Without federal help, states will  have to pour more money to prop up Medicaid, forcing them to make  cutbacks in other parts of the budget. As a result, Moody's chief  economist estimates that 200,000 jobs could be axed without  federal Medicaid support, and the Center for Budget and Policy  Priorities puts the number as high as 900,000—jobs belonging to  teachers, firemen, police, and social workers, among others.

While federal and state governments both contribute to Medicaid  funding, the economic crisis has left the states in a terrible budget  crunch. The federal government has tried to step in, devoting over 60  percent of the federal stimulus money to propping up Medicaid so states  wouldn’t have to make other cuts. But that money is now set to  expire, and the states have yet to recover from the effects of the  recession to make up the difference.

In addition to the unemployment benefit and job losses, the cuts to  social services could be brutal.[3]

[1] State Governments Face Greek-Style Deficits; Day of Reckoning for State Budgets Arrives

[2] States of Crisis for 46 Governments Facing Greek-Style Deficits

[3] Stabenow Asks For Emails, Phone Calls and Outrage: 'Republicans Want This Economy To Fail'

[4] Aid to States May Be Lost as Jobs Bill Stalls

Originally posted to magic3400 on Sat Jun 26, 2010 at 09:14 PM PDT.


Should there be another stimulus bill?

79%164 votes
14%30 votes
4%10 votes
0%2 votes

| 206 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Click here for the mobile view of the site