Skip to main content

Disclosure: I'm advising Open Left in a paid capacity on procedure with regard to the Wall Street reform bill, and thought readers at Daily Kos and Congress Matters would be interested in the information as well.

No, seriously!

Senate and House conferees on Wall Street reform reconvened Tuesday because of Republican objections to $19 billion in fees that would be placed on big financial firms.

The meeting would follow Sen. Scott Brown's (R-Mass.) letter to the chairmen of the conference committee on Tuesday, in which he said he would oppose the Wall Street overhaul bill as it stands.

Because I am always on the lookout for minutia that allows me to qualify all predictions on procedure (because what else would I write about, really?), we're looking pretty smart right now having discussed the possibility of reopening the conference previously.

It appears that rather than have the House act on the conference report at all, the conferees will simply reconvene of their own accord. I wouldn't have guessed that that was an option available to them, given the formality with which conference procedure has been handled. But then again, why not? I haven't actually seen any notes from the Clerk of the House indicating that the conference report has actually been filed, and therefore turned over to the jurisdiction of the House. I guess that could mean the "papers" are still with the House conferees. So that might very well make it the prerogative of those conferees to agree to turn around and head back to conference.

If that's the case, then I guess the entire report is open to revision, which could theoretically be a dangerous thing. Hopefully the conferees have had enough of tinkering with this thing, though, and will limit their work on it to settling the minimum number of issues necessary to get the report through the Senate.

How much change is necessary is an open question, though. If it's just the matter of this collection of $19 billion in fees from the big banks to cover their risk of failure, then I wonder whether it's necessary to do all that much. Scott Brown (R-MA) says he objects. And it's pretty likely that Maine's Senators are ready to pull their customary Lucy & Charlie Brown act, as well.

But if Governor Manchin acts with dispatch and names a successor to Sen. Byrd soon after the funeral services, that successor could very well be in place before the Senate gets to act on the conference report, anyway, since House  rules ordinarily require a 72 hour layover between filing and consideration, and Senate rules require 48. If they finished their negotiations tonight, they could conceivably engineer a Senate vote on Thursday night and then a House vote afterward, even though the House was originally expected to act first. That's a lot of hoops to jump through just to shave things really, really close, and thereby pass the bill before the July 4th recess. But if they're willing to wait to do so after the break, they might well gain some tactical advantage if they can get another cooperative Democratic vote in place reasonably soon.

Other entries on this subject:

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Tue Jun 29, 2010 at 01:30 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site