Skip to main content

Stewart Acuff, chief of staff for the Utility Workers Union of America, says in his new  book, "Getting America Back to Work," that increasing employment requires reinvesting in America and its workers. That would mean the banksters and other financial elites get less of the wealth generated by the economy and workers get more. To take wealth from the richest people in the history of the world requires power, he says in this interview.

Leo W. Gerard: Stewart, you talk about power in a book you’ve written with economist Dr. Richard A. Levins. You called the manual, "Getting America Back to Work."  What’s the relationship between power and getting people back to work?

Stewart J. Acuff:  A big part of the problem we have with this economy or the biggest problem is that most of the money has gone to the Financial Elite -- and the power as well. To get America back to work we have to reinvest in our country and our workers.  That necessarily means that the Financial Elite get less of the wealth generated by the economy and workers will get more.  If you intend to take wealth from the richest people in the history of the world, you have to have enough power to do so.

Gerard:  You say in the introduction that there are two kinds of power: "The first is lots of organized money. That is the kind of power the Financial Elite have used to bring the rest of us to our knees. The other source and form of power is lots of people: organized, mobilized, united, and taking action." Do you really think that organized people can succeed in a wrangle with the financial elites?

Acuff: Absolutely! The economic history of the twentieth century is crystal clear.  When unions were strong, working people had the lion's share of income and the economy worked well.  When unions were weakened, we have seen the Financial Elite take over and run the economy into the ground.

That’s why passing the Employees Free Choice Act is more important than ever.  When we strengthen unions, we strengthen the economy.

Now, Stewart, you sound like some kind of Socialist talking about the fact that at times in the nation’s history the financial elite received collectively as little as 9 percent of the total income earned by Americans but at other times – like right now and right before the Great Depression – the financial elite grabbed more than 23 percent of all income. I mean, aren’t you afraid the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck will accuse you of opposing just rewards earned by the barons of capitalism?

Acuff: Well, my friend, those aren’t just rewards. As my friend Jim Hightower said, members of the Financial Elite were born on third base and say they hit a triple. It’s beyond comprehension that the trading of phony financial instruments like derivatives produces rewards. What produces just rewards is manufacturing and producing goods and services that people need and want. The person who needs just rewards today is the hotel maid who cleans rooms for a living or the overstressed nurse who can’t get to all her patients or the skilled but out-of-work construction worker waiting for the chance to earn an honest day’s pay.

Gerard: Okay, but then you start talking about income tax rates. Are you really suggesting that the current maximum of 35 percent be raised to the 90 percent that it was during the 1950s? Would that not just enrage the financial elite?

Yes, it would enrage the Financial Elite and Dr. Levins and I haven’t made that case in this book. Certainly the income tax rate for the richest among us is far too low. When Warren Buffet himself says he pays a lower percentage of his income in taxes than does his secretary, that’s a problem.

We wouldn't need to rely on taxes to redistribute income if we had the right mix of union power and corporate power.  Instead of a few massive fortunes, we would have millions of working people being productive and using fair wages to stimulate economic growth.

Gerard: Since the days of Reagan, Republicans have told us that taxes on the financial elite should be cut because they need all that money to "re-invest" in the system. That way, the GOP line goes, wealth will trickle down on the "little people." This hasn’t really worked, has it?

No! Not at all! Since the days of Reagan workers wages have stagnated and declined while our productivity has increased. Wealth does not trickle down.  Have you seen any of the TARP billions trickling into your pocket lately? I sure haven't.  All I saw was obscene bonus payments to those who caused the mess in the first place.

Halfway through the book, you suggest working people can have it all – family-supporting jobs, health insurance, even Social Security. Those on the radical right tell us daily that’s impossible because of the national debt. How can you justify such a vision?

 More income means more tax revenue, more economic growth and economic activity. We lift the economy from the bottom, not from the top.

Then you have the audacity to quote some old economists claiming, "An efficient and humane society requires both halves of the mixed system – market and government." We know, because the right-wing has told us repeatedly, that government is bad, that it should be shrunk and drowned in a bathtub. Where did you and Professor Levins come up with this new-fangled idea that government could help?

It’s not a new idea.  It says right in the ECON 101 text that Dr. Levins used in his classes that "markets without government is just one hand clapping."  From the destruction of 2 trillion dollars of America’s wealth by Wall Street to the incessant pouring of oil from BP’s hole in the bottom of the Gulf, we know that capitalism must be regulated and constrained for the sake of everyone.

Which brings us to organized labor. You quote President Kennedy saying, "Those who would destroy or further limit the rights of organized labor – those who would cripple collective bargaining or prevent organization – do a disservice to the cause of democracy." Isn’t that exactly what has happened since the days of Kennedy, a slow destruction of the labor movement with corporations, union-busters and sometimes government regulators all working together to rob labor unions of the power they built between the 1930s and 1950s?

Acuff:  Yes, you’re absolutely right. The results are the mal-distribution of wealth and power and massive recession, a shrinking middle class, a starved consumer demand, and a weaker America.

Gerard: The book was written and published before the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig that was drilling for BP in the Gulf of Mexico. Is it somewhat prophetic, then, that you discuss the need to move from a fossil fuel-based economy to one that creates jobs with renewable energy sources?

 I can’t speak to prophecy though I am a huge fan or both Isaiah and Jeremiah. We’ve long known that America needs to generate its own free energy from free resources like the wind that never stops blowing on Great Plains, the sun that never stops shining in the deserts of Arizona, and incessant pull of the ocean’s tide.

Gerard: I was glad to see the chapter discussing the importance of maintaining and supporting manufacturing in America. For those still unconvinced, why is that so important?

Well, we don’t need to maintain just current manufacturing capacity. We need to increase manufacturing capacity. That is how to generate wealth. We create wealth by making things that other people want to buy and that is the best way to build a sound economy.

Gerard: You sound a little bit like a preacher at the end where you state the four values that Americans can believe in. Do you think America can organize around those values and take on the financial elite?

Yes, I do! I think what we need is a reinforcement of fundamental human values. We’re all in this together; there is a common good; we are our sisters’ and brothers’ keepers, and workers win and have always won by exercising collective power against the individual power of the Financial Elite.

Stewart Acuff is chief of staff for the Utility Workers Union of America. He has organized for 30 years, beginning in 1982 with the SEIU. In 1990, he became president of the Atlanta AFL-CIO. There he led the campaign to organize the 1996 Olympics. A decade later, he went to work for the national AFL-CIO, serving as organizing director from 2001 to 2008. He led the AFL-CIO campaign to pass the Employee Free Choice Act.


Dr. Richard Levins is professor emeritus of applied economics at the University of Minnesota. He is an award-winning author of books about policy and market power.

Originally posted to Leo W Gerard on Tue Jul 06, 2010 at 12:10 PM PDT.


Can workers unify to change the power structure and secure the earnings they deserve?

73%22 votes
26%8 votes

| 30 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks for this. (4+ / 0-)

    I agree:

    That’s why passing the Employees Free Choice Act is more important than ever.  When we strengthen unions, we strengthen the economy.

    I think we have a long struggle in front of us all.  I'm not a union membewr (I'm an attorney), but I see unions as the only organization that can help build a more humane society.  It's starts with worker self-determination. It is only when unions are strong that all of us who seek simple decency in our economy can reclaim the Democratic Party.  

    This is the key value we share:

    Acuff: Yes, I do! I think what we need is a reinforcement of fundamental human values. We’re all in this together; there is a common good; we are our sisters’ and brothers’ keepers, and workers win and have always won by exercising collective power against the individual power of the Financial Elite

    President Obama, at his best, provides rhetoric support for this vlaue that helps undermine the Reagan world-view.

    Our government should work for us, not against us. It should help us, not hurt us. It should ensure opportunity not just for those with the most money and influence, but for every American who's willing to work.

    That's the promise of America - the idea that we are responsible for ourselves, but that we also rise or fall as one nation; the fundamental belief that I am my brother's keeper; I am my sister's keeper.

    Obama 2008 DNC Speech

    Pooties and Woozles unite; you have nothing to lose but your leashes!

    by TomP on Tue Jul 06, 2010 at 12:46:05 PM PDT

  •  Recently my employer....... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TomP, Dirtandiron

      ...published a self-congratulatory article on the company website celebrating a 25 year old partnership with Nippon Steel and Sumitomo. My employer's latest slogan???

                 "BUILDING AMERICA"

    Compost for a greener piles?

    by Hoghead99 on Tue Jul 06, 2010 at 02:12:26 PM PDT

  •  Is this a sign? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Today first I was greeted with a message from Secretary Solis celebrating the 75th anniversary of the Wagner act, where she actually became the first member of the Obama administration to mention the Employee Free Choice Act since he took office. Now I see this great interview where it is actually mentioned a couple of times. Let us know, Leo, if it is time to get up and get this passed. It is way past time.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site