Skip to main content

Bloomburg reports that:

"The Securities and Exchange Commission voted 3-2 today to require that companies put investor board candidates on the proxy statements sent to stockholders before director elections. Investors or groups that meet the ownership threshold for three years will be eligible to offer nominees.
The SEC acted in response to investor complaints that company-selected directors failed to rein in compensation and risk-taking that led to more than $1.79 trillion of financial- company writedowns during the credit crisis."

You can read the whole report here:

The most interesting comment to me was the response from business leaders and the Chamber of Commerce; predictably they are opposed.  And the reason they give for being against the rule?

"Business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have fought the change, arguing that labor unions and pension funds will use the threat of proxy fights to seek concessions that would harm companies."

In other words, not all shareholders are created equal.  Shareholders who use the corporation to pay themselves obscene amounts of money at the expense of other shareholders, employees, and communities are somehow the only ones who should count when selecting board members.

And will our country's well compensated business leader accept this rule?  Of course not.

"Using the proxy process to give labor unions, pension funds and others greater leverage to try to ram through their agenda makes no sense," David Hirschmann, chief executive officer of the Chamber’s capital markets unit, said in a statement. The business lobby "will continue to fight this flawed approach using every method available," he said.

My question is, why should the agenda of corporate executives to enrich themselves while the rest of the country suffers through a recession be rammed down our throats.  Why should the agenda of worker and retiree shareholders be less worthy of board representation?

A board of directors is a group of people legally charged with the responsibility to govern a corporation on behalf of the stockholders, all the stockholders -- a more progressive definition is that the board is responsible to the stakeholders, that is, to everyone who can be effected by the corporation.

The Chamber of Commerce, the nation’s biggest business lobby, is weighing the possibility of filing a lawsuit to protect their right to steal from the rank and file shareholders.

Originally posted to ahumbleopinion on Thu Aug 26, 2010 at 01:51 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (6+ / 0-)

    Superman may be able to leap tall buildings in a single bound, we mortals have to do it one step at a time. Patience, persistence, votes.

    by ahumbleopinion on Thu Aug 26, 2010 at 01:51:05 PM PDT

  •  ahumbleopinion - the Proxies (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    neroden, ahumbleopinion

    I had commented about this approximately two weeks ago in another thread. However, apparently not many people fully understood the situation or my explanation. Originally, in the Financial Fix Bill there were provisions that would have required a shareholder majority vote to ratify corporate officer salaries, corporate officer bonuses and Golden Parachutes. However, the same usual suspect Senators like Bachus, Landrieu, Pryor, Conrad, Bayh, Dodd, Nelson of Nebraska, and Lincoln, etc. wouldn't go along with that legislation; therefore Barney Frank simply had to give in during the reconciliation of the bill.

    You know, for years the pension administrators  (who control State, Federal and City Retirement programs, etc.) around America have been clamoring for this specific legislation. Furthermore, they control billions of shares worth trillions of dollars in value. Thus, the original legislation would have been a real game changer, since the pension administrators were ready to team up and veto these outrageous corporate rip offs right from the get go.

    Yet I guess that now having the right to seek proxies and put up their own candidates constitutes some measure of progress for the pension fund administrators. We'll just have wait and see if it becomes an effective vehicle to actually reign in these outrageous corporate compensation packages.

    Finally, thanks for writing this diary - because people need to know as much as they can about the despicable corporate America and the shameless Chamber of Commerce.      


  •  Another HUGE issue the Dems ignore (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Major Tom, neroden, soms, Nightshade Q

    But could run on

    The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. --George Orwell

    by jgkojak on Thu Aug 26, 2010 at 02:27:22 PM PDT

  •  Yes (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Major Tom, neroden

    This is your simple answer to a simple question.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site