Skip to main content

We know that the mainstream media treats deliberate lies as beliefs and places them on the same level as facts. Hence, FOX News treats the birthers as having just as legitimate a belief as folks who point to Obama's birth certificate and the two Honolulu newspaper nmotices of his birth.  News is a business, and they do not want to alienate viewers.

Eduction is more of a business than people think. Can you imagine a professor of constitutional law treating nullificatio  as just one legitimatge belief among many?

I have been retired for more than a dozen years, but dined recently with a person who teaches constitutional law at an elite college.

We were talking about the expectations of young people. I related what a community college prof told me about the attitude of his students. They are pessimistic and see no good future for themselves.

I remarked that his elite youngsters must have a different view. Yes, they come from money and homes where the parents had good incomes. These kids know doors would be open to them.

I said something to the effect that you would not have to deal with people who believe in nullification, the discredited theory that states can set aside laws of Congress.

He answered that many of his students are Tea Baggers and believe this.

He said he begins by treating it as a legitimate belief. Pedagogically, one has to do that or forever loose the attention of those students.

Then he would work his way through the history of the dispute, but he would not go beyond that and declare trhe issue settled and nullification to be erroneous.

I thought about that for a few minutes and realized the position of a professor and a FOX analyst are not dissimilar.

Had he gone beyond that point, he would  might have been brought up on charges.

He would have survived, but there would have been a hearing and he would have experienced some humiliation.

My friends who specialize in the Middle East tell me it is even more dangerous to deal with the Palestinian question ia a balanced way. It is also true that someone who questions some anthropological studies undergirding feminist theory might face a hearing.

If the media and the academy concludes that facts must be subordinated to unsupportable opinion, our democratic process is in deep trouble.

Today we are seeing the politics of the "Big Lie." Some of the lies are absurd and laughable, but they are believed by so many. A few journalists have tried to be truth-tellers, but most have shirked the task.  If the people who peddle the lies win big in November, thew Big Lie will be a respected and honored part of our process.

Maybe my view of the process is wrong. From my perspective, we should all revere the process and punish by withholding our votes  those who pollute it with lies and appeals to base emotions.  

Recently the great German theorist Jurgen Habermas wrote about the German debate over the Greek and Portugese debt. He dismissed the current anger because he knew that when election time came, most voers woulod put aside emotions and look at questions rationally because they so revered the democratic process.

If anyone wrote that about our voters in 2010 we would doubt the writer's sanity.

Originally posted to ShermanDeBrosse on Sat Sep 04, 2010 at 05:49 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site