Skip to main content

Yesterday, we learned that Fox News is suing Robin Carnahan over her campaign's use of a small clip in one of her ads.

In the ad, Wallace addresses Blunt and says, "You just said a moment ago that you have to show that you’re the party of reform but some question whether you are the man to do that. In 2002, you tried to insert language into the Homeland Security Act to help Phillip Morris tobacco [company] while you were dating that company’s lobbyist. And your campaign committee’s paid $485,000 to a firm linked to lobbyist Jack Abramoff."

The reason that Fox stated in its suit is that this clip -- from 2006, which doesn't mention Carnahan at all -- could be mistaken for a Fox endorsement of Robin Carnahan's Senate run.

That seems ridiculous enough on the face of it, and the length of the clip the campaign used clearly falls within fair use. So what's the real reason that Fox is hot under the collar? Could it be that Fox has already made their endorsement in the form of cash?

Carnahan's allies also point to just under $10,000 in campaign donations that Blunt has received from the political action committee of News Corp., which owns Fox News.

Let's review. First Fox asks Roy Blunt about all the favors he's done for people who gave him money. Then Fox News gives him money. All I can say is, they must have liked his answers.

"Investing" in Roy Blunt has really paid off for lobbyists in the past, and Fox is doing everything they can to protect their spot at the front of the line this time around. Of course, there's one way to devalue Fox's investment -- elect Robin Carnahan.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Fri Sep 17, 2010 at 12:46 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site