Skip to main content

Such a statement seems obvious:  Tea Party nominees are unfit for office. But, it's really the crux of the matter and we're overlooking it.

Remember when the Yippies in the form of Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin went to the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago and ran a pig for president?

The Tea Party is doing the equivalent with its gaggle of goofball candidates, but it's not satire, not metaphor, not commentary on the system. They're doing it for real and actually getting the public to consider their ding dong idiots as being able to become competent senators and representatives.

The judgment "unfit" should be stamped across every one of their fliers, commercials, and press conferences.

Talk about lowering the bar for public office. Maybe the likes of Christine O'Donnell, Sharron Angle, Joe Miller and the idiot of them all, Sarah Palin, will make it possible for anyone who has a hankering for a little fame or some undeserved notoriety to step forward thinking they are Cincinnatus, leaving their plow on the living room couch to come forth and save the country from liberals and progressives.

Sure, the bar for qualifications is low; that is, basically being of age and an American citizen for most offices, but the lack of self criticism and capability is appalling.  

Most disturbing is thinking about any of these no-minds being in a crisis position. During my lifetime, I've lived through two crises that have brought the world to the eve of destruction:

  1. The Cuban missile crisis. I was twelve years old when the quarantine went into effect and I clearly remember climbing the stairs to my bed one night at about ten o'clock and wondering whether there would be a world in the morning.
  1. The 2007 financial collapse. Having watched the news during those days and shuddered along with the talking heads and the pundits, I became even more weak-kneed upon reading the accounts about Bernanke, Paulsen, and Geithner dealing with the near collapse of one financial institution after another, leading to the Lehman bankruptcy and its aftermath. Paulsen didn't have the dry heaves for nothing.

Now, can you imagine any of the Tea Party nominees getting even close to dealing with such crises? Anyone with a lick of sense on this basis alone should be willing to do anything and everything from keeping these unfit candidates from attaining office.

The flip side of crises is the mundane practices of governing:  making laws, holding hearings, understanding the workings of Congress. There isn't anything about any of the Tea Party candidates that speaks to their qualifications for handling the minutiae of being a representative or a senator.

We tried this in Minnesota, where I am, with the election of Jesse Ventura as governor. Despite his rhetoric and good intentions, he was terrible at governance. Fortunately, he had enough sense to get out of the job after four years, probably realizing that there's more to being in office than making flip comments on David Letterman.

The Tea Party nominees are unfit to hold political office. Regardless of what we think of the Obama administration and the Democratic controlled house and senate, we should nonetheless work hard to keep the Tea Party nominees out of office.  

Originally posted to ronlysc on Tue Sep 21, 2010 at 05:25 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site