Back in 1994, when Republicans unveiled their first "Contract With America," it seemed novel -- an effective turn of phrase. Democrats tried to counter with "Contract ON America," but perhaps that just went over folks' heads.
I wonder if, given recent history, there hasn't been a change in the idea of the "contract" -- and if that doesn't amount to opportunity.
So:
SUBCONTRACT WITH AMERICA: How Republicans intend to enter into a legal relationship with an employer, then show up only sporadically, generally late, and do a poor job once they finally get around to doing anything at all.
MILITARY CONTRACTORS WITH AMERICA: How Republicans intend to privatize the military along with everything else and wind up paying a whole lot more for it, even as they refuse to cut military spending, and thereby undermine the basic idea of the nation-state.
More below the fold...
Forgive the brief diary -- hoping that others can chime in as well.
BREACH OF CONTRACT WITH AMERICA: How Republicans, in pandering to a Tea Party intent on undermining the Constitution, intend to rewrite the nation's original contract in the same way megachurch pastors rewrite scripture.
THE NO-BID CONTRACT WITH AMERICA: How Republicans seek absolute power under the mantle of "competition" with cheap, disingenuous tricks of rhetoric and without ever acknowledging better plans than no-plan.
CONTRACT DISPUTE WITH AMERICA (see above): How Republicans intend to battle ever bit of established precedent, and resist every passed law, thereby demonstrating that contracts mean absolutely nothing (and Oliver Wendell Holmes could have told them that).
CONTRACT AMERICA: How Republicans' isolationist approach to economics and world affairs will make America smaller, generally less influential, and thereby less safe.
Hope to find even more incisive options in the comments...