Skip to main content

She told the President, "I'm exhausted at defending you" and wanted to know "Is this my new reality?".

Well, I think most of the country is exhausted.  Those of us still working are running around like exhausted little gerbils inside our little exercise wheels, running twice as hard as we used to, mostly to make up for all the people who AREN'T working with us anymore.  Meanwhile, those above us tell us a) how lucky were are to even have a job and how b) we have to make even more profits for them because they might have to pay more taxes next year.

The top 400 richest Americans have acombined 8% more in net worth in 2009 than they did in 2008, the rest of us have flat or declining incomes.  I had someone comment the the other day that just having a job is like getting a raise these days. My, how the exhausted American worker's expectations have fallen in the past several years!

This is NOT the change we all voted for.  Ms. Velma Hart said it, I say it and I think there is an awful lot of those in the Tea Party movement who are saying it.....they just aren't articulating it very well.  

On NPR this morning, I heard a Pennsylvania senior say it perhaps better than anyone.  He complained that the Republican's obviously screwed things up in the past decade so he and many others voted for change in the 2008 elections and yet, despite the advocates who SAID they were going to change things after winning the election, change never came.  He sounded quite exhausted.

Like he did to Ms. Hart, President Obama would tell him, "Change is here, I've stopped the greedy insurance companies from some of the excesses they have practiced in the past. Among those changes, you can no longer exclude children based upon pre-existing conditions" and he'd be right, except you can't make them offer coverage if they don't want to stay in that market anymore.  So, the five largest publicly traded health insurers in the country no longer will offer the coverage.  I could detail the many, many way companies are avoiding the law, but I'd merely be duplicating others efforts here.

The President also touted several other broad initiatives the administration did at his press conference on Tuesday. He outlined several (and here I get Palinesque) "changey things" his administration has done to right the wrongs inflicted upon those who DON'T look for where they are on Fortune's list when its published.  Every one of the points he outlined were true.  

But not one of them makes me less exhausted.  Not one of them lets ME see MY net worth grow 8% in one year, like Mr. Buffet's, Mr. Gates, Mr. Ellison and the other 397 people who hold 1.4 TRILLION dollars of this nation's wealth saw their net assets grow.  Well, you may think, Mr. Obama and his administration aren't responsible for your income or your assets, so why blame them?  Well, at the core of it all, I'm somewhat of an economic & social egalitarian, that is why.  I understand we're in hard times.  I "get it".  What I don't get is why the American people would put up with a society where, quite obviously, the rich get richer and the middle class is being allowed to disappear at an ever accelerating rate.

What I don't understand is why we've swallowed the myth that "unions are bad" when, despite all their other failings, they produced an average of between 21% and 32% higher wages than non-union workers in the same industry.  I wonder if the media moguls who decide what we hear might not be responsible for just a little bit of the negative news & editorial content we see on unions.  So, Mr. President, what did you do in your first year and a half in office?  You prodded, bullied and shoved Congress into passing a bloated giveaway (with a few protections) of a health care bill full of loopholes, instead of putting your efforts behind something that might make the average lower and middle-class American a little less exhausted (and certainly richer!): Card Check.

And, when Wall Street said that unless they got their "fix", Main Street would jones along with them, you stepped up to the plate and rescued them and more than likely our whole economy.  And then proceeded to NOT use your bully pulpit to chastise them when they successfully blocked initiatives such as taxing them at the same rate as their own secretaries.  Sure, you mention it when the rich bring it up as a criticism on how exhausting you've allowed their tax burden to become, but Mr. President, present & planned changes are not about to rid us of such injustice (and dozens of others like it!) that we voted to CHANGE!.  You said it yourself:

I think most folks on main street feel like they got beat up on. And I’ll be honest with you, there’s probably a big chunk of the country that thinks I’ve been too soft on Wall Street. That’s probably the majority, not the minority.

So, if you KNOW the majority of us don't like it, no way, no how, WHY don't you bring those points up, over and over and over again?  Why not, since, by your own admission, WE AGREE WITH YOU for heaven's sake!  Let them hear it loud and clear way up on Wall Street.  Bring the populist anger out that Main Street feels, for heaven's sake HARNESS that anger, get out in front of the Tea Party set, don't keep exhausting us by making us defend you!  

When spending cuts are called for, propose tax loophole closures, propose corporate welfare reductions, corporate subsidies, write-offs.  Here's an example: For any and all corporate or individual income OVER $X million in any one year, disallow this set or that of deductions; advance the concept that it will be things that will impact only the top 1%. Items such as corporate jet travel or the deductible expenses of meetings at posh resorts.  For heaven's sake, don't say you'll raise taxes, just take away the deductions from excess income that is allowed now.  What of subsidies? The list of corporate giveaways is endless!  Remember, don't impact the first few million dollars of net income, we all want to get there and a few of us just might.  If you just offer up another slice of corporate pork each time the Republicans' bring the need to control spending up, they'll eventually learn how to become vegetarians.  They'll get tired of it.  Maybe even exhausted!

We'd all be a little less tired also if we didn't have to worry about our jobs going elsewhere.  Here is something that you've brought up, which I KNOW resonates with us exhausted people out here, but which you've seemed to forgotten to PUSH: off-shoring of jobs.  Companies should be allowed to take jobs off-shore, but if they do, they lose all American tax deductions forever, regardless of country of origin, period.  Why should we give them any, since they aren't making a contribution to those of us in middle America?  And, to the naysayers who say it can't be done and still let us be competitive, respond by saying "Well, lets just CHANGE it for awhile and see what American ingenuity can do".  For once, let's channel the intellectual energy of the financial types into creating ways to make money while KEEPING our jobs, rather than effectively "selling" our jobs overseas.  It is a bit harder, but I am sure they're up to it!  Let's make them feel a little exhaustion for once.  Somehow, multinational companies like Siemens have done it in other countries!

So, you want to fire this exhausted base up?  You want us ready to win?  Start talking about real, positive change for the rest of the 90-so percent of us who make up this great country and tell the top 1% that its time for OUR change now.

They've had their turn!

Originally posted to Copp on Thu Sep 23, 2010 at 08:47 AM PDT.

Poll

I feel like I need to:

44%8 votes
5%1 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
16%3 votes
33%6 votes

| 18 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  If every advance must contain (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sunspots

    poison pills that render the advance ineffective, it really should come as no surprise that people are sick to death of the process. Bleeding the patient went out of fashion a very long time ago when it was finally discovered that it only led to anemia and an increase in the "bad humors" it was supposed to leach from the system.

    "Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." Oscar Wilde

    by nippersdad on Thu Sep 23, 2010 at 09:20:52 AM PDT

    •  Its all relaitive (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      nippersdad

      We could live with a 94% tax on incomes over $500k from 1945-1955 just fine.....I'm advocating a LOT less poison than that.

      •  Progressive taxation is a good thing, (0+ / 0-)

        I agree totally. What I was thinking about were, for example, new funding for renewable energy that was only gotten by paying off big oil, gas and nuclear through subsidies and new extractionist policies which dwarf anything that might be gained through the renewable initiative itself. Most of the funding in the policy goes for building green tech in China, I think it only got us about thirty five jobs for all the billions that will be spent. Literally.

        Health care insurance reform bought at the price of further limiting a woman's right to choose and forcing mandates for insurance monopolies, a FinReg Bill that leaves the worst of the derivatives unregulated......This was more the type of thing that I was getting at, or trying to.

        "Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." Oscar Wilde

        by nippersdad on Thu Sep 23, 2010 at 11:04:29 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  It may not be the change you voted for (0+ / 0-)

    but it is the reality you're stuck with. Kind of like waking up from a 3 day bender and asking "what did I do?"

    Ever see "Hangover"? Perfect analogy for the current state of affairs.

  •  Did ya'll really think it would take only (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bornadem, greengemini, Govinda

    2 years to change the things that needed changing?  Maybe I've seen too much in my life to look for quick changes.  

    •  I wonder if all of us who are older (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Copp, Sunspots

      are able to grasp the notion that we could afford to wait and that the younger citizens among us don't have that luxury.

      Those of us that are old enough to be (or are) grandparents had opportunities that are no longer available in our country.

      I never missed a meal, I got an education and had no difficulty finding a job.  I had health insurance that covered everything I needed it to cover and so did my family.  I bought a house, saw it rise in value and was able to sell it when the time came if I needed to move. I have a retirement and social security.  I am okay and I'll bet you are okay too.

      ...but the younger generation cannot afford to wait...no jobs, no affordable education, phony health "insurance", missed meals and little to no hope for any of the things that we older people have/had a chance to enjoy...things we could count on as we lived our lives.

      With 'hope' gone, there is no more waiting...it's going to get dicey.  People don't just conveniently lay down and die and most will fight back if they are being robbed.

      •   I understand, I have kids & grandkids now. (0+ / 0-)

        But I did grow up poor and a lot of times hungry, with no health insurance. In fact about 4 years ago I had breast cancer without insurance and my children paid for it.  I remeber being 18 with an acute appendix about to burst, and the hospital required payment up front.  So I was wheeled into a room to wait for my mother to sell the only thing we had, a yearling calf, before they would operate. I almost died.

        I put myself through school with no backup from family. It took me 10 years.  I wanted my children to have things a lot better, and they did.

        I am in this fight for my grandchildren. I know the fight will be long. I am grateful for my social security because that's the only money I have to live on.

        I am not a patient person. I don't like to wait for things to get better. I know what it is to be hungry and worried about housing.  

        No matter how much I'd like things done right now, I've also learned that that's not how it works.

        Hope only dies when we give up.

    •  No, but... (0+ / 0-)

      I was hoping for some real honest discussions along those lines by someone other than Greyson and a few (very few) others.  I don't know, I guess people just aren't upset enough yet to really do anything about it...except for the Tea Party, who, absent their racist/Fox inspired anger are really a force to be harnessed by someone who can speak to their frustration in real terms.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site