Skip to main content

Life, as we all know, is unfair. As Bertrand Russell noted, "In the part of this universe that we know there is great injustice, and often the good suffer, and often the wicked prosper, and one hardly knows which of those is the more annoying." We were born in an unfair world, and we will almost certainly die in one. A rational person does not conclude that activity to improve things is useless. This we also know.

But when it comes to collective action for the common good, we sometimes have trouble acting on the basis of the obvious.

In our personal lives, we tend to think and act more rationally. There's nothing we can do to eliminate the danger of being killed in a car accident; nonetheless we wear seat belts, because the odds of being killed are significantly decreased. But when it comes to collective action for the common good, we're more vulnerable to irrational thinking, because the connection between individual action and butt-saving is not so direct.

The media says there is an "enthusiasm gap": Republicans care more if Republicans take over Congress than Democrats do. If that's true, then a significant number of Democrats are allowing themselves to be swayed by irrational thinking. They're driving without seatbelts, because they're not focused on actions and consequences.

If some Democrats want to punish Barack Obama at the ballot box for the gap between the soaring rhetoric of the Presidential campaign and the reality we live today, sitting on their hands while Republicans take down Russ Feingold and Jim McGovern and the Democratic Congress is an irrational way to do it. No matter what happens in November, Barack Obama will almost surely be President for at least two more years. The rational way for Democrats to hold Obama accountable at the ballot box for unfulfilled promise is to agitate for and support a progressive Democratic challenge to Obama in 2012, when Obama will be on the ballot. We can talk more about that after the Congressional election.

Right now, we should consider this: Russ Feingold and Jim McGovern and the majority of Democrats in Congress fought for more action to reduce unemployment.  Russ Feingold and Jim McGovern and the majority of Democrats in Congress fought for a public option for health insurance. And Russ Feingold and Jim McGovern and the majority of Democrats in the House, alongside 18 Democrats in the Senate, fought for a timetable to end the war in Afghanistan.

Letting the Republicans win will not make Washington more progressive. It will make Washington more reactionary.

If the Republicans take over Congress, the national media narrative will be, "Obama moved too far to the left. Now he has to move to the center." Of course, the national media are just aching to conclude this. If it rains on the Fourth of July, it's because the Democratic President moved too far to the left. But if Republicans take over Congress, there will be an objective basis for this narrative. This narrative will shape all press coverage and all public debate on all issues for the next two years, if the Republicans win.

If the Republicans win, they will have a huge megaphone to dominate national debate and set the policy agenda for the next two years, much bigger than the huge megaphone they already have now. Most Americans don't know who John Boehner is, but if he becomes Speaker of the House, they will learn. A key frame of reference for the media will be whatever the Republicans are saying, much more than it is already. Prepare for stories like this every day: "According to Speaker Boehner, the moon is made of green cheese. But some experts dispute this."

If Feingold or McGovern is defeated, there won't be a Feingold-McGovern amendment to establish a timetable for military withdrawal from Afghanistan, supported by the majority of House Democrats and 18 Democrats in the Senate. But even if they are not defeated, if Republicans take over Congress, there might be no vote on such an amendment, because the Republican leadership might not allow it. And the same dynamics are likely across the board: everything progressives want will be much less likely, everything progressives fear will be more likely, if the Republicans take over Congress. Action to reduce unemployment will be less likely. Cuts to Social Security such as by raising the retirement age will be more likely. The war in Afghanistan will likely go on longer. Modest reforms that would improve the lives of many to labor law, environmental regulations, immigration policy, and foreign policy are likely to be blocked. Cuts in military spending will be less likely. Equal rights for gay men and lesbians will fall lower on the Washington agenda.

To fail to be enthusiastic about the possibility of preventing such a terrible outcome is to capitulate to unreason. If we are diagnosed with cancer, and it turns out that a medical treatment is likely to save us, would we not be enthusiastic about such a treatment?

And the good news is this: it's never been easier to do a small bit to stop the Republicans from taking over. Perhaps we live in a district that is not competitive. It's never been easier for us to get involved somewhere else. Virtually all literate Americans can afford a monetary contribution to a candidate they like who is in a competitive race. The super-rich donate to political campaigns - are they poor judges of self-interest? As individuals, the super-rich have more money, but people who work for a living are far more numerous; if we all throw what we can in the hat, we can dominate the super-rich. For your individual contribution to have more political impact, donate through an organization you like, such your labor union, MoveOn, Progressive Democrats of America, Democracy for America, or the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.

And it's never been easier to effectively contribute a small amount of time. On the weekend of October 2-3, MoveOn will be organizing calling parties around the country. Attending one of these parties is an easy and efficient way to participate with a small amount of time. In two hours, you can go, do your bit, and leave. You're sheltered from the elements, you get food and drink and the company of pleasant people. The phone calls you make are not to random people, but to MoveOn members in competitive districts, who are generally very happy to hear from you. Your ask is simple: can they volunteer an hour or two at the campaign office of a progressive champion like Russ Feingold or Jim McGovern or Alan Grayson?

To find out where and when the MoveOn calling party is near you - or to organize one yourself - you can go here.

And if you can get to Washington on October 2- check here for transportation - join the AFL-CIO, the NAACP, many peace organizations and hundreds of thousands of others on the Mall as we "Demand the changes we voted for" and rally for Jobs, Justice, Education, and Peace as part of "One Nation Working Together."

Originally posted to Robert Naiman on Mon Sep 27, 2010 at 02:17 PM PDT.


Feingold-McGovern and a Dem Congress for Jobs and Peace

77%17 votes
22%5 votes

| 22 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm unenthusiastic about Feingold (0+ / 0-)

    When a Democrat spends his time holding hearings on czars and voting against major legislation, it's really hard to get excited about supporting him.  Nice to see the idiocy about a primary challenge has already begun.

    "I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum."

    by mark louis on Mon Sep 27, 2010 at 03:05:46 PM PDT

    •  Obama has certainly earned a primary challenge (0+ / 0-)

      The only idiocy is this farcical two party system. Heads (dems) Wall Street wins, Tails (repubs) Wall Street wins bigger.

      What a great fucking choice!

      Feingold is one of the few who actually works FOR the American People, so it is telling that you'd be unenthusiastic about him.

      Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist. - Kenneth E. Boulding

      by Earth Ling on Mon Sep 27, 2010 at 03:27:04 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Good people in Congress (0+ / 0-)

    These are good people. They have done good work. There is abundant evidence of that. The problem is that our society, and axiomatically, our political system, is sick — to the core.

    In fact, extreme right wing politicians, regardless of what they might these days be calling themselves, with their shining smiles, should be banned from public life, just as their fascist ancestors were after the second world war.

    They are a pestilence, a disease. We will not get anywhere until we recognize that what we are dealing with is a disease — mental illness — not a bit of debate about policy. I mean, come on! Monica Poulter?? Their poster girl?? She is a mutant, a cancer. And she is proliferating — a titillating darling of the Press. Please.

    Are you prepared to live in the world she is preparing for you? If not, you had best size up your options, your possibilities, because if she and her like have not been totally discredited by now, and in fact are back in ascendancy, what is going to happen to you?

    Russ Feingold is a good man — perhaps not a revolutionary — but if his ilk represented the majority in the legislature, our lives would be unrecognizably better.

    Who pushed for impeachment of Bush?
    Who pushed for crimes against humanity?
    Who dragged Dems to morality in the Bush era?

    "True peace is not merely the absence of tension -- it is the presence of justice." MLK

    by dhaemeon on Mon Sep 27, 2010 at 04:06:24 PM PDT

    •  Other than calling RW'ers a disease (0+ / 0-)

      as it implies, even unintentionally, they ought to be killed like germs, I agree with your post - especially about how our lives would be better if we had more legislators like Russ.

      All other hoped-for outcomes for the betterment of this nation flow from the bedrock of Good Government.

      by zett on Mon Sep 27, 2010 at 06:13:46 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Not unintentionally (0+ / 0-)

        I like to think that I am not so vulnerable to making unintentional prescriptions for murder.

        There is a wide gap between perception and prescription. I have not advocated murder, even by implication, and certainly not unintentionally, so I don't know why you think it relevant to conjure it from nowhere.

        I believe, based on very long experience of canvassing, of political activism, of talking to the mythical "folks" that our politicians address, that progressives are dealing with the rise of fascism — and are fundamentally failing to come to grips with it. There are lots of historical precedents for this, the results of which have always been ugly.

        So am I uncompromising about the political rights of imbeciles like Sarah Palin? Yes. Do I advocate murder. No.

        "True peace is not merely the absence of tension -- it is the presence of justice." MLK

        by dhaemeon on Mon Sep 27, 2010 at 06:51:24 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site