Skip to main content

I have been thinking long and hard about the state of the Progressive movement and our role in this coming election. What are we to do when over 30 House Democrats and several Senate Democrats say they actually want to extend the tax cuts for the rich? When you consider some of these same people were against the stimulus, you have to recognize that some of them just are not on our side. Social and economic justice do not seem to be issues these people are willing to fight for.

So the question remains what are we to do? I think we need to look at this as a long term battle rather than the current skirmish.

In short, I think what we must do is earn some respect.

Respect for the Progressive movement has been lacking recently both inside and outside the Democratic Party. I don't think I need to recap the recent statements by people high up in the current administration. What some of their statements show, more than anything else, is that they do not respect us. We can blame them for that without thinking or we can ask ourselves if we have earned that respect. Well, have we earned their respect? You don't earn respect simply by demanding it, you must earn it through your actions as well.

The Progressive movement has made great strides since Bush was "elected" the first time. We have become sophisticated enough to smell out astroturfing almost immediately and have developed the ability to counter the spin from ultra-conservative sources like Fox News. We have created a community which comes together to discuss important policy points and brings them to the forefront of national dialog. We can take a single issue or event and with some concentrated effort, turn it into a news story that the national media (except Fox News) cannot ignore.

One of the most significant accomplishments of the Progressive movement is the ability to quickly raise funds from thousands of small dollar donors in little time. Barack Obama's funding during his Presidential run is a good example of that. We also were able to raise millions of dollars in little time for Bill Halter during the primary in Arkansas against Blanche Lincoln. But it wasn't enough in the latter case, to my great disappointment. There are many other accomplishments, but I won't go into this in great detail.

Instead, we must talk about our deficiencies. What are we doing or not doing to earn spite from within the Democratic Party, besides the fact that we support certain policies?

There are things we have done that give people reason to spite us. Now, that doesn't mean we weren't justified in doing them. We know we made an enemy of Joe Lieberman. His defeat in the primary was a great victory for us, but we weren't able to finish the job, allowing him to thwart a public option and a medicare-buy-in. He pretty much admitted that he opposed them just to piss us off.

We also tend to be a rather fickle voting block. The strongly Democratic Progressives will vote in November. I have no doubt. However, what is constantly ignored is that the Progressive movement has many more groups within it. We have Green Progressives, they very well might vote for a third party candidate instead if our candidates are bad or we don't inspire them. We have some rather non-political groups who may not vote if we don't excite them. For example, the independents so dearly love people who have strong viewpoints and convictions. That is the group we are most likely to lose in this election. The young first time voters who, without Barack Obama, would have been rather apolitical otherwise. This is really the problem with all the compromises.

The much bigger question is, what are we not doing to earn respect? I think Obama, whom I have been pretty critical of from policy and tactics standpoints, highlighted some of this in his deliberate comments to Rolling Stone.

Rolling Stone

It is inexcusable for any Democrat or progressive right now to stand on the sidelines in this midterm election...

Everybody out there has to be thinking about what's at stake in this election and if they want to move forward over the next two years or six years or 10 years on key issues...

We have to get folks off the sidelines. People need to shake off this lethargy, people need to buck up. Bringing about change is hard — that's what I said during the campaign. It has been hard, and we've got some lumps to show for it. But if people now want to take their ball and go home, that tells me folks weren't serious in the first place.

If you're serious, now's exactly the time that people have to step up.

In other words, if the Progressive movement wants to be taken seriously (be respected) you need to back up your words with actions...get some Democrats elected.

While we talk a big game, we often fail to back up what we say. That is how you lose respect. The key is to not be too emotional or reactionary. Something I think most of us will agree we do too often.

However, the most important thing Progressives need to do is get to work on the ground in their local and state races. That is the biggest failure of our movement so far. Let me use one example of which I have first hand knowledge.

A group of Arkansans and Progressives across the country were able to galvanize enough people to urge Bill Halter to get into a primary against Blanche Lincoln in Arkansas. This was a major success. The leaders of the Netroots from DailyKos to Accountability Now and unions really stepped up and gave their support early. I was on the ground in Arkansas and tried to galvanize support for Halter online. We were successful enough to get him into the race by gathering nearly 1000 "Draft Bill Halter" facebook fans and having them call into his office to urge him to run. While we made a valiant effort, we came up short. As someone who was on the ground, I can tell you we did come up short.

While progressives were supportive with their donations nationally, getting progressives on the ground mobilized was like pulling teeth. A small group of college students were able to galvanize some support for a short while, but it ultimately fell apart when the school year ended. The local campaign office in Fayetteville was too often completely empty besides the campaign employees. This despite them calling and emailing people to come down to help out...the same people who promised their support earlier. We ended up losing Washington County, despite it being a liberal bastion. However, there were other reasons besides lack of volunteers.

People would show up for the rallies, hundreds of people, but when it came to sign up a time to do some work people either didn't sign up or they signed up and just didn't show up...repeatedly. We would literally have a rally with 100 people and the next day, struggle to get anyone to actually show up to volunteer.

This was my effort in translating the online Progressive movement to on the ground support in an election. It may not have been the best state to try it in, but even in areas where it should have been easy, it was not. Part of the reason appeared to be that there were many liberals who were totally disconnected from the progressive movement. Not necessarily by choice, but simply because they are not active online or in national politics. We need to find a way to get these local and state liberal groups engaged. We need to interface with our local green groups and other local Democratic Party organizations. We need to get them on the Progressive team. Otherwise, the most active and respected members in our local areas will not be on our side. We need those people to make sure that our campaigns can get the on the ground support we need to win.

That is not an easy proposition. It will take some work. The good news is that we have the chance to do that right now. We can take it upon ourselves to get to work in local and state races all across the country. We can earn ourselves respect...from local, state, and national Democrats. So please, get to work and elect some Democrats.

Originally posted to jsamuel on Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 09:22 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Some work (11+ / 0-)

    I hope this helps people understand where the Progressive movement needs to go. It is a long term fight. One election is too short term of a view. We need a long term view of how to bring about real change.

  •  I Have To Admit I Almost Respect The Tea Party (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    neroden, jsamuel, TomP, TKLTKL94

    sure they are bat shit crazy. Sure they are banked rolled by the Republican establishment. And they've nominated folks that in more then a few states/districts where they might help us keep the House and Senate. The list of things wrong with them is pretty long.

    But alas, in basically one election cycle they turned their party on its heads and get folks they believe hold their views on the ballot.

    How long have progressives between working, since like the 60s and we fail more times when we succeed.

    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

    by webranding on Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 09:26:19 AM PDT

  •  Very good analysis Jsamuel. (6+ / 0-)

    Deoliver47, quoting Bernice Johnson Reagon: "If you're in a coalition and you're comfortable, you know it's not a broad enough coalition"

    by TomP on Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 09:35:18 AM PDT

  •  Good diary (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Stuart Heady, neroden

    What would help the progressive arm of the party, beyond mere demographics which will strengthened it enormously in coming years, is to realize that just because conservative democrats do not support every piece of legislation they support does not make them an enemy.

    Many come from Red/Purple districts where a progressive candidate would have little chance of being elected. But just by dent of having a D behind their names they make the difference between a Pelosi Speaker-ship and, most likely, a Mike Pence one.

    The powers granted to control of the House by the framers rivals those of the President. Blue dogs make control possible.

    And if you'd bother to look at their records most vote with us quietly on labor, civil rights and other issues Dems hold dear....

    "Fascism is attracting the dregs of humanity- people with a slovenly biography - sadists, mental freaks, traitors." - ILYA EHRENBURG

    by durrati on Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 09:44:43 AM PDT

  •  It is complicated. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    neroden, jsamuel, enhydra lutris

    In Washington, the republicans have had not problem getting their "moderates" on board with their leadership's goals.  Democrats have democrats joining republicans to filibuster legislation that would pass with a majority vote.  Watching this unfold and continue for almost 2 years has been demoralizing for many of us.  Likewise Obama's unwillingness to condem republicans and his priority of not wanting to be seen as attacking republicans has been frustrating.  For us who understand the need to continue to reinforce the contrasts between the parties and their policies there has been very little in the way of leadership at the top.  I've given up tying to guess why that is.  

    But if Obama is looking for a reason I suggest he look no further than last August, Death Panels and all, when there was absolutely no push back from the top.  Who took their ball and went home then?

  •  Progressive Community is an Oxymoron (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Stuart Heady, jsamuel

    When you throw "Work" in there it becomes a Shakespearian tragedy.

    Dear Wall Street: If you want to stop feeling like a piñata, stop stuffing yourself with our f#@$ing candy.

    by TooFolkGR on Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 09:51:04 AM PDT

  •  asdf (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    neroden, Predictor

    get some Democrats elected.

    We do, but not singlehandedly. No other faction singlehandedly does so either. The problem is that we support their people, in the generals and sometimes in the primaries, but they oppose ours, as in the Halter case, backing guaranteed losers in a half-assed attempt to suck up to the right.

    That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt -

    by enhydra lutris on Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 11:13:13 AM PDT

  •  You only get respect when you're taken (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    neroden, enhydra lutris
    seriously.  Having over 100 progressive Democrats sign a letter to the president promising not to vote for any health insurance reform bill unless it contained a public option, only to have all of them cave and vote for one without one, is not a mark of seriousness.  That's why they're ignored, taken for granted, or used as a punching bag by other Democrats.

    "I've never believed that government's role is to create jobs . . . So this week, I've proposed a six year infrastructure plan."

    by Paleo on Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 11:17:03 AM PDT

  •  I subscribe to the George Lakoff school (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    neroden, jsamuel

    I think Progressives do a poor job of explaining the issues in a moral framework that engages others to come to the cause. We spend too much time arguing using Republican terms and falling for conservative frames.

    When we do succeed, it's because we change the frame for a short amount of time. Electing President Obama wasn't really about electing a progressive (though deep in my heart, I wish that's what it was). It was really about the historic election and electing an African American for President. People were excited because they wanted to be a part of history.

    The rest of it is all hardwork. No one wants the hardwork if it doesn't mean it won't change something. They dont' see the connection and we're not doing a good enough job making them feel the connection.

    I love the diary. I'm glad other people are thinking about this too. I'm a strong progressive but refuse to join the Democratic Party because they do not have, and have not had for a long time, a cohesive message. The have a party platform that, for the most part, seems to be there to be ignored. I can't belong to a party like that. And I don't have the energy to change the party from within. I'll continue my fight for progress on the peripheral edge.

  •  This diary is a crazy circular argument (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    In other words, if the Progressive movement wants to be taken seriously (be respected) you need to back up your words with actions...get some Democrats elected.

    So let's see we got President Obama elected but he doesn't take us seriously so we need to ... get more Democrats elected.  And if they don't take us seriously then we should ... get more Democrats elected.

    You want to be taken seriously the first thing to make clear is to Obama is that if he doesn't take us seriously we will use all of our power and passion to deny him a second term.  If he thinks he's getting a hard time from the left now he hasn't seen anything.

    •  I disagree with that. (0+ / 0-)

      I think there is such thing as being counterproductive by doing things that are over emotional or reactionary. I believe primarying the sitting president of the Democratic Party is one of those things. There are much more productive things for us to spend our time and money on.

  •  This Diary Deserves More Consideration (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    neroden, jsamuel

    Very small number of comments.

    Perspective, is one word that encapsulates what is needed in order to generate more political traction.

    Nationally, the present discussion only gained real influence pretty recently, and it ought to be front and center that this medium represents the only capability for a truly national participatory discussion about everything that ought to be discussed if there really is to be such a thing as a progressive movement.

    The whole discussion moves very slowly, but election cycle to election cycle, there is knowledge gained by the entire national community on a variety of fronts and this continues to increase the effect progressives have.

    Participation in all its dimensions have to become a more dominant ethic, though.  As the diarist describes, there is a big difference between the sort of thing that crowd events are and the work that really is at the heart of making political progress.  

    That work, from election to election, combined with determination will ultimately succeed.  

    hope that the idiots who have no constructive and creative solutions but only look to tear down will not win the day.

    by Stuart Heady on Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 09:03:57 PM PDT

  •  Good luck, but I suspect that (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    one major problem is that progressives are generally very busy trying to survive; either money issues or health issues, et cetera.

    It's no accident that the Tea Party "activists" are either funded by rich billionaires or are retired -- or both.

    This means to me that you'll only get results when progressives have nothing left to lose.  Which could happen any time now, thanks to the Republicans' make-them-all-starve attitude.

    -5.63, -8.10. Learn about Duverger's Law.

    by neroden on Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 11:13:56 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site