First, go read RLMiller's diary on the two state budget initiatives that Californians consider in this election.  Or, you can just take my word for it that the first one, Prop 25, is good, and the second one, Prop 26, is bad.

You need convincing, but you still withstand the allure of the brilliant diary linked above?  OK:  Prop 25 would give California a majority vote budget -- and a possible return to fiscal sanity.  Prop 26 would mean that we'd not only need a 2/3 vote of both houses of legislature (plus the Governor's signature or a veto override) to raise taxes, but we'd also need it to raise fees.  In Grover Norquist's terms, Prop 26 fills the bathtub to drown the state government.

But numbers are so confusing.  How do we get the message out to voters?

How about with this fraction: 25/26?

Come with me back to elementary school math for an explanation.

Some of you may want to take a deep breath before reading about basic math, and some of you may need to put yourself in restraints.  Take your time.

OK, see if you remember this.  A positive fraction can be less than, equal to, or greater than 1.  We understand fractions that are less than 1.  We even understand fractions that are equal to 1, although they are rather boring in most circumstances.  But fractions that are greater than 1?  Seven-sixths of a cake?  Ten-thirds of a trip from San Diego to Santa Barbara?  Fifty-seven-thirteenths of your wages?  "No," the young mind cries out: "NO!"

And so we have a term for these beasts that ought to, in normal life circumstances, be reduced to mixed numbers like 1 and 1/6, that don't frighten the horses.  We call them improper fractions.  Fractions that are less than or equal to 1, by contrast, are called proper fractions.

Now you need to know something about Props 25 and 26: both may lose, but only one may win.  Because they address the same subject matter, only the one that gets more votes can win if they both receive over 293/586 (oh, OK, 1/2) of the vote.

And that is why -- if you read RLMiller's diary -- nasty energy companies are putting a lot of money into "No on 25 / Yes on 26."  They want to make sure that 26 ends up over 25.  But that would be 26/25 -- and that's improper!

25/26, by contrast, is entirely proper!  I don't recommend that those of you who are already sweating at the above should try to compute it into a decimal -- as some joker in comments will no doubt do, possibly me -- but you can see easily that it's proper!

So here's a pitch to help voters remember how to vote:

"Twenty-five over twenty-six is proper; twenty-six over twenty-five is improper."

Or, in numerals, which is the button I'd like to buy:

25
---   is proper
26

26
---   is improper
25

Now some of you may say, "this is hardly the stuff of which a diary ought to be made!"  And you may not buy my excuse that I have to go to a DFA meeting soon to pitch people to volunteer for Brown.  So to you, I say:

(2) I may have gotten some of you to read RLMiller's diary

and both of those are entirely proper!

Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
 Unpublish Diary (The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.) Delete Diary (The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

• 25 over 26(17+ / 0-)

it's not just a proper fraction, it's the better law!

"So if you don't have any teeth, so what? ... Isn't that why they make applesauce?" -- GOP leader Rush Limbaugh

• How about "25 will cost you less than 26"?(8+ / 0-)

especially in the long run.

Best of luck on this one - California needs to drop that insane 2/3 super-majority rule.

• Another analogy I heard is of a sandwich:(9+ / 0-)

24 = peanut butter, vote yes
25 = jelly, vote yes

Or maybe I'm just hungry :)

Seriously, the more I hear about Prop 26, the less I like it.  It's a constitutional amendment, meaning it'll be near-impossible to change.  It's drafted to be retroactive to 1/1/10 just to roll back some fees imposed in early 2010.  Here's more info and a pie chart.

• Hi Seneca (1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
Seneca Doane

Hey do you have an opinion on the following CA judicial considerations? I'm trying to figure out where they fit on the liberal/moderate/conservative scale... thx.

Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye
Ming W. Chin
Carlos R. Moreno
George W Nicholson
Harry E. Hull Jr.
M. Kathleen Butz

Free University and Health Care for all, now. -8.88, -7.13

• Moreno is considered the most progressive justice(1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
SoCalHobbit

the California Supreme Court and has written some great opinions.  Chin is considered to be relatively conservative and very smart.  I think there's very little chance he won't be retained.  Cantil-Sakauye was just appointed, so we don't really know what she'll be like, but I understand that both her record on the lower courts and her reputation is pretty moderate.  She is considered very bright and I greatly like the one opinion of hers that I know best.  I'll keep my own plans on how I'll vote confidential.

Don't read anything into my lack of comment on the others; I'll try to see if some progressive lawyer's group has endorsements.

"So if you don't have any teeth, so what? ... Isn't that why they make applesauce?" -- GOP leader Rush Limbaugh

[ Parent ]