Skip to main content

So I tend to be cynical.  No shit, Sherlock.  I cannot abide stupidity and the tendency to make the obvious seem so deep, revelatory and new.

Since I have a strong distaste for massacred language, let me start there.  Overuse can be just as abused and thus, meaningless, as misuse.  Have you noticed that in today’s world of food, just about everything is represented as "artisanal?"  Pasta, sauces, and other  foods prepared with the total integration of its cook are labelled this hip term.  Whatever happened to homegrown, home-cooked and honestly represented victuals?  Artisanal foods are nothing more than going back to basics in food preparation as if our desire for fattening up ourselves never took hold.  But it did, so now producers and preparers have hit on a new word to re-package the most simplest of principles in healthy food preparation and consumption.

The other word that is way too overused is "iconic."  This word implies a convention, whether pertaining to an object or an idea, that is superlative in nature.  Thus, if everything is described as iconic, as a new-fangled innovation, nothing is actually iconic.  Just another example of America’s quest for the superlative which, in reality, makes things just run-of-the-mill.

Back on the subject of food, a study  came out this week showing that a person who gets more sleep has less of a tendency to become obese:

This may be attributed to two cute little hormones called leptin and ghrelin.  Hell, what about the plain fact that when a person is sleeping, they cannot stuff their face with food?  Hormones, shmormones.  The relationship of more sleep and less weight gain seems rather apparent to me, sans a degree in medicine and rocket science research.

When an idea is a good one, it will hit you right across your face.  I have been so slapped by the UPS commercials that use the word "logistics" to the tune of  "That’s Amore":


With my penchant for reason and order, I love this ad.  Then, throw in a catchy tune and I am in Heaven.

Now on to my fave topic for discussion: politics —– and how the obvious is usually anointed as something new in that arena.  Starting at home, in Virginia’s Eleventh Congressional district (my crib), Gerry Connolly is running to tack on another term to his first.  He is a Democrat and I will vote for him.  However, it is a tough race against Keith Fimian in a district that oftentimes is neither red nor blue, but purple.  I received a phone call from one of Connolly’s henchmen the other day asking for a pledge.  I denied him that donation, so then he asked me to work their phone banks for a few hours.  I likewise refused that offer.  While Connolly has my vote, he will not get my money or my time.  As I explained to this campaigner, Connolly was playing cutsie when mulling over his vote for President Obama’s financial reform package.  Connolly hemmed and hawed, seemingly playing out his vote a la Senator Ben Nelson during the health care debate.  Connolly gets my half-assed support because he did not support his President whole-heartedly when it was needed.  Believe me, there was not one part of my argument that this campaign worker did not understand.  Pretty obvious it was, and he got it.

On the subject of the recent Mideast peace talks, perhaps you can explain to me why Netanyahu even agreed to initiate and participate in the discussions when, within two weeks of their beginning, he did not re-instate the building moratorium on the West Bank.  Why would he waste his time, our President’s and Secretary of State’s time, when he knew from the get-go that this hot-button issue would kill the talks as surely as his hawkish political position kills Israeli kids?

It is as clear as day to me that we need another WPA administration to right our infrastructure and provide jobs for our people.  A crumbling infrastructure coupled with a very high unemployment rate just screams for a new public works program:

Is this hypothetical wedding between what we need and what we have at hand just so obvious that our geniuses in government haven’t picked up on this yet?  Hard to believe.

Finally, the Nobel Peace Prize was announced yesterday honoring Liu Xiaobo, a Chinese dissident who has been relentlessly fighting for human rights since the Tiananmen Square debacle in 1989.  The Nobel prizes are supposed to be above politics, but his one, thankfully, was an "in-your-face" admonition to the Chinese government.  Edward Wong of the New York Times wrote an insightful article on the prize award and called the Nobel Committee’s action a "rebuke" to China:

My favorite paragraph, once again pointing out a principle that is as obvious as the day is long, is:


Few nations today stand as more of a challenge to the democratic model of governance than China, where an 89-year-old Communist Party has managed to quash political movements while creating a roaring, quasi-market economy and enforcing a veneer of social stability.

While China thinks that it is all well and good to be the world’s number one economic power as they deny their citizens human rights, the global opinion might be very different.  This Peace Prize just might be the smack across their heads that the Chinese need to bring their restrictive people policies in line with their financial dominance.  Don’t hold your breath though.  The obvious is sometimes so damn obvious that it is ignored in the hope that it will just go away.  China may still be able to laugh all the way to the bank, but eventually, when their war on personal freedoms encroaches on their economic potential, things will change.  And Liu Xiaobo will have had a large part in that turn around, as well as the Nobel Committee for having the guts to bring Liu’s work to the table.

Is everything new really old hat? Not quite, but the there is a lot to be said for the obvious.

Originally posted to yomamaforobama on Sat Oct 09, 2010 at 08:01 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Just for the record... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ybruti, marykk, JeffW

    ...there have been quite a few WPA/CCC-related diaries - including on the Front Page - that you could link to instead of having to choose some johnny-come-lately piece from Huffington Post. Here's one from a year ago: Resurrect and Energize the Conservation Corps and here's another from two years ago, All Infrastructure Is Not Created Equal.

    Don't tell me what you believe. Tell me what you do and I'll tell you what you believe.

    by Meteor Blades on Sat Oct 09, 2010 at 08:45:07 AM PDT

    •  Why are you like.... (0+ / 0-)

      so many other KOS commentators who respond to a diary just to get your daily dose of venom?

      •  There's no venom... (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        slatsg, marykk, JeffW

        ...I'm merely pointing out that support for a modern WPA/CCC-style jobs program is not something new even though the Huffington Post just began supporting the idea. Numerous diarists and three Front Pagers have been doing so here starting 22 months ago. Of course, many of those diarists were trashed by people who said the President knew best and would institute such programs if they were really needed.

        Don't tell me what you believe. Tell me what you do and I'll tell you what you believe.

        by Meteor Blades on Sat Oct 09, 2010 at 09:03:55 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Some of us.... (0+ / 0-)

          have other responsibilities in our daily lives, like jobs and family, so we cannot spend the bulk of our time scanning the KOS site for the ultimate link.
          Nevertheless, you like so many other astute KOS readers, always feel "trashed".  Especially when hindsight is 20-20.

          •  A simple search with the words... (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            slatsg, JeffW

            ..."WPA" and/or "CCC" would turn up the diaries I've spoken of.

            Hindsight? I love this canard. How about foresight?

            These ideas were first proposed here nearly two years ago. When the argument was put forth in favor of a modernized WPA/CCC then and afterward as a necessary means of dealing with the millions of people who had been laid off, some critics said that this shouldn't be done, couldn't be done, or that it was too soon to think about. A number of us said that if action was not taken soon, the President's political capital would be too used up to propose such a program - political capital being something that every President loses as his term in office ages. That wasn't hindsight. But it does turn out to have been 20-20.

            Don't tell me what you believe. Tell me what you do and I'll tell you what you believe.

            by Meteor Blades on Sat Oct 09, 2010 at 09:44:04 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site